Move `llvm.x86.*` shims into `shims::x86` and implement `_addcarry_u32` and `_subborrow_u{32,64}`
This PR moves all `llvm.x86.*` shims into `shims::x86` and adds `llvm.x86.addcarry.32`, `llvm.x86.subborrow.32` and `llvm.x86.subborrow.64`.
Additionally, it fixes the input carry semantics of `llvm.x86.addcarry.32`. The input carry is an 8-bit value that is interpreted as 1 when it is non-zero.
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/cpp-compiler/developer-guide-reference/2021-8/addcarry-u32-addcarry-u64.html
Add assembly test to make sure that inlining works as expected when closures inherit target features
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108338 (the added test proves that it is working correctly)
Clarify example in `Pin::new_unchecked` docs
This example in the docs of `Pin::new_unchecked` puzzled me for a relatively long time. Now I understand that it comes down to the difference between dropping the `Pin` vs dropping the pinned value.
I have extended the explanation to highlight this difference. In my opinion it is clearer now, and I hope it helps others understand `Pin` better.
fix OS-specific I/O safety docs since the io_safety feature is stable
Looks like this text was forgotten to be updated when `io_safety` got stabilized: it still says "once the io_safety feature is stable".
Also adjust the wording a bit for how these docs relate to the general concept of I/O safety.
prevent ice when threshold is 0 and enum has no variants
changelog: [`enum_variant_names`]: prevent ice when threshold is 0 and enum has no variants
r? `@y21`
Fixes the same ice issue raised during review of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11496
Add OwnedTargetMachine to manage llvm:TargetMachine
LLVMRustDisposeTargetMachine taking a &mut could be undefined behaviour.
Wrapping it with a struct and using pointers instead avoids this problem.
In addition the TargetMachine is now automatically freed via the Wrappers drop impl. This should fix some memory leaks when
create_informational_target_machine was used, e.g. 327e6cf55c/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs (L291-L314)
r? `@Nilstrieb`
Rename the legacy feature gating macro
It had a really confusing name by shadowing the previous name, which has
caused issues in the past where people added their new syntax in the
legacy location.
This makes it clear.
Also adds a comment about the return type notation gating, which confused me why it was here at first before `@compiler-errors` told me why.
Fix debug printing of tuple
Self-explanatory. Didn't create a UI test, but I guess I could -- not sure where debug output shows up in rustc_attrs to make a sufficient test, tho.
Add missing tests for configuration options
I noticed that a lot of lints didn't have test(s) for their configuration. This leads to issues like #11481 where the lint just does nothing with it.
This PR adds tests for *almost*[^1] all of the lints with a configuration that didn't have a test in ui-toml.
The tests that I wrote here are usually two cases: one for where it's right above or under the limit set by the config where it shouldn't lint and another one for right above where it should.
changelog: none
[^1]: allow-one-hash-in-raw-strings is ignored by needless_raw_string_hashes
Add Zba, Zbb, and Zbs as target features for riscv64-linux-android
This pull request adds the Zba, Zbb, and Zbs target features to the `riscv64-linux-android` target specification. These features have been enabled and tested internally in Android infrastructure.
Add Minimal Std implementation for UEFI
# Implemented modules:
1. alloc
2. os_str
3. env
4. math
# Related Links
Tracking Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100499
API Change Proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/87
# Additional Information
This was originally part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100316. Since that PR was becoming too unwieldy and cluttered, and with suggestion from `@dvdhrm,` I have extracted a minimal std implementation to this PR.
The example in `src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/unknown-uefi.md` has been tested for `x86_64-unknown-uefi` and `i686-unknown-uefi` in OVMF. It would be great if someone more familiar with AARCH64 can help with testing for that target.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
