They've been deprecated for four years.
This commit includes the following changes.
- It eliminates the `rustc_plugin_impl` crate.
- It changes the language used for lints in
`compiler/rustc_driver_impl/src/lib.rs` and
`compiler/rustc_lint/src/context.rs`. External lints are now called
"loaded" lints, rather than "plugins" to avoid confusion with the old
plugins. This only has a tiny effect on the output of `-W help`.
- E0457 and E0498 are no longer used.
- E0463 is narrowed, now only relating to unfound crates, not plugins.
- The `plugin` feature was moved from "active" to "removed".
- It removes the entire plugins chapter from the unstable book.
- It removes quite a few tests, mostly all of those in
`tests/ui-fulldeps/plugin/`.
Closes#29597.
Fix incorrect trait bound restriction suggestion
Suggest
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait<T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++
```
instead of
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait + <T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++++
```
Fix#117501.
Pretty print `Fn` traits in `rustc_on_unimplemented`
I don't think that users really ever should need to think about `Fn*` traits' tupled args for a simple trait error.
r? diagnostics
Add all RPITITs when augmenting param-env with GAT bounds in `check_type_bounds`
When checking that associated type definitions actually satisfy their associated type bounds in `check_type_bounds`, we construct a "`normalize_param_env`" which adds a projection predicate that allows us to assume that we can project the GAT to the definition we're checking. For example, in:
```rust
type Foo {
type Bar: Display = i32;
}
```
We would add `<Self as Foo>::Bar = i32` as a projection predicate when checking that `i32: Display` holds.
That `normalize_param_env` was, for some reason, only being used to normalize the predicate before it was registered. This is sketchy, because a nested obligation may require the GAT bound to hold, and also the projection cache is broken and doesn't differentiate projection cache keys that differ by param-envs 😿.
This `normalize_param_env` is also not sufficient when we have nested RPITITs and default trait methods, since we need to be able to assume we can normalize both the RPITIT and all of its child RPITITs to sufficiently prove all of its bounds. This is the cause of #117104, which only starts to fail for RPITITs that are nested 3 and above due to the projection-cache bug above.[^1]
## First fix
Use the `normalize_param_env` everywhere in `check_type_bounds`. This is reflected in a test I've constructed that fixes a GAT-only failure.
## Second fix
For RPITITs, install projection predicates for each RPITIT in the same function in `check_type_bounds`. This fixes#117104.
not sure who to request, so...
r? `@lcnr` hehe feel free to reassign :3
[^1]: The projection cache bug specifically occurs because we try normalizing the `assumed_wf_types` with the non-normalization param-env. This causes us to insert a projection cache entry that keeps the outermost RPITIT rigid, and it trivially satisifes all its own bounds. Super sketchy![^2]
[^2]: I haven't actually gone and fixed the projection cache bug because it's only marginally related, but I could, and it should no longer be triggered here.
Suggest
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait<T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++
```
instead of
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait + <T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++++
```
Fix#117501.
Fix order of implementations in the "implementations on foreign types" section
Fixes#117391.
We forgot to run the `sort_by_cached_key` on this section. This fixes it.
r? `@notriddle`
Remove support for alias `-Z symbol-mangling-version`
(This is very similar to the removal of `-Z instrument-coverage` in #117111.)
`-C symbol-mangling-version` was stabilized back in rustc 1.59.0 (2022-02-24) via #90128, with the old unstable flag kept around (with a warning) as an alias to ease migration.
Clarify `Unsize` documentation
The documentation erroneously says that:
```rust
/// - Types implementing a trait `Trait` also implement `Unsize<dyn Trait>`.
/// - Structs `Foo<..., T, ...>` implement `Unsize<Foo<..., U, ...>>` if all of these conditions
/// are met:
/// - `T: Unsize<U>`.
/// - Only the last field of `Foo` has a type involving `T`.
/// - `Bar<T>: Unsize<Bar<U>>`, where `Bar<T>` stands for the actual type of that last field.
```
Specifically, `T: Unsize<U>` is not required to hold -- only the final field must implement `FinalField<T>: Unsize<FinalField<U>>`. This can be demonstrated by the test I added.
---
Second commit fleshes out the documentation a lot more.
Don't check for alias bounds in liveness when aliases have escaping bound vars
I actually have no idea how we *should* be treating aliases with escaping bound vars here... but the simplest behavior is just doing what we used to do before.
r? aliemjay
Fixes#117455
Most notably, this commit changes the `pub use crate::*;` in that file
to `use crate::*;`. This requires a lot of `use` items in other crates
to be adjusted, because everything defined within `rustc_span::*` was
also available via `rustc_span::source_map::*`, which is bizarre.
The commit also removes `SourceMap::span_to_relative_line_string`, which
is unused.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #117298 (Recover from missing param list in function definitions)
- #117373 (Avoid the path trimming ICE lint in error reporting)
- #117441 (Do not assert in op_to_const.)
- #117488 (Update minifier-rs version to 0.3.0)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not assert in op_to_const.
`op_to_const` is used in `try_destructure_mir_constant_for_diagnostics`, which may encounter invalid constants created by optimizations and debugging.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117368
Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt inlining tests
Part of #116971, adds FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt tests in `tests/mir-opt/inline`.
I left out a few (such as `inline_cycle`) where it mentioned that the particular outcome of inlining isn't important, just that the inliner doesn't get stuck in an infinite loop.
r? cjgillot
Account for `ref` and `mut` in the wrong place for pattern ident renaming
If the user writes `S { ref field: name }` instead of `S { field: ref name }`, we suggest the correct code.
Fix#72298.
Support enum variants in offset_of!
This MR implements support for navigating through enum variants in `offset_of!`, placing the enum variant name in the second argument to `offset_of!`. The RFC placed it in the first argument, but I think it interacts better with nested field access in the second, as you can then write things like
```rust
offset_of!(Type, field.Variant.field)
```
Alternatively, a syntactic distinction could be made between variants and fields (e.g. `field::Variant.field`) but I'm not convinced this would be helpful.
[RFC 3308 # Enum Support](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3308-offset_of.html#enum-support-offset_ofsomeenumstructvariant-field_on_variant)
Tracking Issue #106655.
Clean up unchecked_math, separate out unchecked_shifts
Tracking issue: #85122
Changes:
1. Remove `const_inherent_unchecked_arith` flag and make const-stability flags the same as the method feature flags. Given the number of other unsafe const fns already stabilised, it makes sense to just stabilise these in const context when they're stabilised.
2. Move `unchecked_shl` and `unchecked_shr` into a separate `unchecked_shifts` flag, since the semantics for them are unclear and they'll likely be stabilised separately as a result.
3. Add an `unchecked_neg` method exclusively to signed integers, under the `unchecked_neg` flag. This is because it's a new API and probably needs some time to marinate before it's stabilised, and while it *would* make sense to have a similar version for unsigned integers since `checked_neg` also exists for those there is absolutely no case where that would be a good idea, IMQHO.
The longer-term goal here is to prepare the `unchecked_math` methods for an FCP and stabilisation since they've existed for a while, their semantics are clear, and people seem in favour of stabilising them.
Match usize/isize exhaustively with half-open ranges
The long-awaited finale to the saga of [exhaustiveness checking for integers](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50912)!
```rust
match 0usize {
0.. => {} // exhaustive!
}
match 0usize {
0..usize::MAX => {} // helpful error message!
}
```
Features:
- Half-open ranges behave as expected for `usize`/`isize`;
- Trying to use `0..usize::MAX` will tell you that `usize::MAX..` is missing and explain why. No more unhelpful "`_` is missing";
- Everything else stays the same.
This should unblock https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37854.
Review-wise:
- I recommend looking commit-by-commit;
- This regresses perf because of the added complexity in `IntRange`; hopefully not too much;
- I measured each `#[inline]`, they all help a bit with the perf regression (tho I don't get why);
- I did not touch MIR building; I expect there's an easy PR there that would skip unnecessary comparisons when the range is half-open.
Replace switch to unreachable by assume statements
`UnreachablePropagation` currently keeps some switch terminators alive in order to ensure codegen can infer the inequalities on the discriminants.
This PR proposes to encode those inequalities as `Assume` statements.
This allows to simplify MIR further by removing some useless terminators.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113241 (rustdoc: Document lack of object safety on affected traits)
- #117388 (Turn const_caller_location from a query to a hook)
- #117417 (Add a stable MIR visitor)
- #117439 (prepopulate opaque ty storage before using it)
- #117451 (Add support for pre-unix-epoch file dates on Apple platforms (#108277))
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustdoc: Document lack of object safety on affected traits
Closes#85138
I saw the issue didn't have any recent activity, if there is another MR for it I missed it.
I want the issue to move forward so here is my proposition.
It takes some space just before the "Implementors" section and only if the trait is **not** object
safe since it is the only case where special care must be taken in some cases and this has the
benefit of avoiding generation of HTML in (I hope) the common case.
Accept less invalid Rust in rustdoc
pulled out of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117213 where this change was already approved
This only affects rustdoc, and has up to [20% perf regressions in rustdoc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117213#issuecomment-1785776288). These are unavoidable, as we are simply doing more checks now, but it's part of the longer term plan of making rustdoc more resistant to ICEs by only accepting valid Rust code.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116267 (Some codegen cleanups around SIMD checks)
- #116712 (When encountering unclosed delimiters during lexing, check for diff markers)
- #117416 (Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted)
- #117421 (coverage: Replace impossible `coverage::Error` with assertions)
- #117438 (Do not ICE on constant evaluation failure in GVN.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
