[arithmetic-side-effects] Finish non-overflowing ops
Extends https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9474 to also take into consideration "raw" binary operations. For example, `let a = b / 2` and `let a = 1 * b` won't trigger the lint.
changelog: [arithmetic-side-effects] Finish non-overflowing ops
Make module-style lints resilient to --remap-path-prefix
changelog: [`self_named_module_files`], [`mod_module_files`]: Make module-style lints resilient to `--remap-path-prefix`
Without this if a user has configured `--remap-path-prefix` to be used for a prefix containing the current source directory the lints would silently fail to generate a warning.
Migrate write.rs to a late pass
changelog: Migrates write.rs from a pre expansion pass to a late pass
changelog: [`positional_named_format_parameters`] is renamed in favour of the rustc lint `named_arguments_used_positionally`
- Macros are now identified by diagnostic items, so will no longer lint user defined macros named, e.g. a custom `print!`
- `print_literal`/`write_literal` no longer lint no longer lint literals that come from macro expansions, e.g. `env!("FOO")`
- `print_with_newline`/`write_with_newline` no longer lint strings with any internal `\r` or `\n`s
~~A false negative, `print_literal`/`write_literal` don't lint format strings that produce `FormatSpec`s, e.g. ones containing pretty print/width/align specifiers~~
Suggestion changes:
- ~~`print_literal`/`write_literal` no longer have suggestions, as the spans for the `{}`s were not easily obtainable~~
- `print_with_newline`/`write_with_newline` has a better suggestion for a sole literal newline, but no longer has suggestions for len > 1 strings that end in a literal newline
- ~~`use_debug` spans are less precise, now point to the whole format string~~
The diff for write.rs is pretty unwieldy, other than for the `declare_clippy_lint!`s I think you'd be better off viewing it as a brand new file rather than looking at the diff, as it's mostly written from scratch
cc #6610, fixes#5721, fixes#7195, fixes#8615
Fix `unused_peekable` closure and `f(&mut peekable)` false positives
changelog: Fix [`unused_peekable`] false positive when peeked in a closure or called as `f(&mut peekable)`
The `return`/`break` changes aren't part of the fix, they allow an earlier return in some cases. `break` is replaced with `return` for style purposes as they do the same thing in this case
Fixes#9456Fixes#9462
Don't panic on invalid shift while constfolding
Instead of panicking on invalid shifts while folding constants we simply give up. Fixes#9463
Notice the "attempt to shift right by `1316134912_u32`", which seems weird. AFAICS it comes from rustc itself.
changelog: none
Don't lint `large_stack_array` inside static items
We now check if the linted `Expr` is inside an `ItemKind::Static`, which can't take the suggested `Box<[...]`. I _think_ this is the correct fix for #9460
I removed `if_chain` while I was at it.
changelog: Don't lint `large_stack_array` inside static items
Use macro callsite when creating `Sugg` helper
Closes#9375
changelog: Improvement: [`collapsible_if`]: Suggestions now work with macros, by taking the call site into account.
Replace u128 with u64 in large_enum_variant uitest
A u128 has [an 8 byte alignment on x86](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54341), but a 16 byte alignment on aarch64 which changes the size of the enums due to extra padding. This means the test fails on aarch64
changelog: none
Fix `range_{plus,minus}_one` bad suggestions
Fixes#9431.
The current `range_plus_one` and `range_minus_one` suggestions are completely incorrect when macros are involved.
This commit resolves this by disabling the lints for any range expression that is expanded from a macro. The reasons for this are that it is very difficult to create a correct suggestion in this case and that false negatives are less important for pedantic lints.
changelog: Fix `range_{plus,minus}_one` bad suggestions
Fixes#9431.
The current `range_plus_one` and `range_minus_one` suggestions
are completely incorrect when macros are involved.
This commit resolves this by disabling the lints for any range
expression that is expanded from a macro. The reasons for this
are that it is very difficult to create a correct suggestion in
this case and that false negatives are less important for
pedantic lints.
[Arithmetic] Consider literals
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9307 and makes the `arithmetic` lint behave like `integer_arithmetic`.
It is worth noting that literal integers of a binary operation (`1 + 1`, `i32::MAX + 1`), **regardless if they are in a constant environment**, won't trigger the lint. Assign operations also have similar reasoning.
changelog: Consider literals in the arithmetic lint
Suggest `unwrap_or_default` when closure returns `"".to_string`
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9420
changelog: [`unwrap_or_else_default`]: suggest `unwrap_or_default()` instead of `unwrap_or_else` with a closure that returns an empty `to_string`.
`BindingAnnotation` refactor
* `ast::BindingMode` is deleted and replaced with `hir::BindingAnnotation` (which is moved to `ast`)
* `BindingAnnotation` is changed from an enum to a tuple struct e.g. `BindingAnnotation(ByRef::No, Mutability::Mut)`
* Associated constants added for convenience `BindingAnnotation::{NONE, REF, MUT, REF_MUT}`
One goal is to make it more clear that `BindingAnnotation` merely represents syntax `ref mut` and not the actual binding mode. This was especially confusing since we had `ast::BindingMode`->`hir::BindingAnnotation`->`thir::BindingMode`.
I wish there were more symmetry between `ByRef` and `Mutability` (variant) naming (maybe `Mutable::Yes`?), and I also don't love how long the name `BindingAnnotation` is, but this seems like the best compromise. Ideas welcome.
Unlike past similar work done in #6228, expand the existing `or_fun_call`
lint to detect `or_insert` calls with a `T::new()` or `T::default()`
argument, much like currently done for `unwrap_or` calls. In that case,
suggest the use of `or_default`, which is more idiomatic.
Note that even with this change, `or_insert_with(T::default)` calls
aren't detected as candidates for `or_default()`, in the same manner
that currently `unwrap_or_else(T::default)` calls aren't detected as
candidates for `unwrap_or_default()`.
Also, as a nearby cleanup, change `KNOW_TYPES` from `static` to `const`,
since as far as I understand it's preferred (should Clippy have a lint
for that?).
Fixes#3812.
Fixes#9351.
Note that this commit reworks that fix for #9317. The change
is to check that the type implements `AsRef<str>` before regarding
`to_string` as an equivalent of `to_owned`. This was suggested
by Jarcho in the #9317 issue comments.
The benefit of this is that it moves some complexity out of
`check_other_call_arg` and simplifies the module as a whole.
Fix `mut_mutex_lock` when Mutex is behind immutable deref
I *think* the problem here is the `if let ty::Ref(_, _, Mutability::Mut) = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(recv).kind()` line tries to check if the `Mutex` can be mutably borrowed (there already is a test for `Arc<Mutex<_>>`), but gets bamboozled by the `&mut Arc` indirection. And I *think* checking the deref-adjustment to filter immutable-adjust (the deref through the `Arc`, starting from `&mut Arc`) is the correct fix.
Fixes#9415
changelog: Fix `mut_mutex_lock` when Mutex is behind immutable deref
Don't use `hir_ty_to_ty` in `result_large_err`
fixes#9414
This occurs starting with 2022-09-01. I checked that this does fix the ICE on rust-lang/rust@9353538. Not sure which pr caused the late-bound region to leak through `hir_ty_to_ty`.
changelog: None
