Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #74521 (older toolchains not valid anymore)
- #74960 (Fix regionck failure when converting Index to IndexMut)
- #75234 (Update asm! documentation in unstable book)
- #75368 (Move to doc links inside the prelude)
- #75371 (Move to doc links inside std/time.rs)
- #75394 (Add a function to `TyCtxt` for computing an `Allocation` for a `static` item's initializer)
- #75395 (Switch to intra-doc links in library/std/src/os/*/fs.rs)
- #75422 (Accept more safety comments)
- #75424 (fix wrong word in documentation)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
fix wrong word in documentation
Change "two" to "three", since there are three significantly different things printed below that sentence:
---
While these:
```rust
println!("{}, `{name:.*}` has 3 fractional digits", "Hello", 3, name=1234.56);
println!("{}, `{name:.*}` has 3 characters", "Hello", 3, name="1234.56");
println!("{}, `{name:>8.*}` has 3 right-aligned characters", "Hello", 3, name="1234.56");
```
print two significantly different things:
``` rust
Hello, `1234.560` has 3 fractional digits
Hello, `123` has 3 characters
Hello, ` 123` has 3 right-aligned characters
```
---
[`https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/#precision`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/#precision)
Accept more safety comments
This accepts more `// SAFETY:` comments from `tidy`.
This is done after the current behaviour of requiring text one the same line (because spaces are stripped so the last space never pass if there is no text on the same line) bit me once more in #75066
This could potentially accept empty `// SAFETY:` comments but `tidy` is an internal tool used only here so my reasoning is reviews will catch those.
Fix regionck failure when converting Index to IndexMut
Fixes#74933
Consider an overloaded index expression `base[index]`. Without knowing whether it will be mutated, this will initially be desugared into `<U as Index<T>>::index(&base, index)` for some `U` and `T`. Let `V` be the `expr_ty_adjusted` of `index`.
If this expression ends up being used in any mutable context (or used in a function call with `&mut self` receiver before #72280), we will need to fix it up. The current code will rewrite it to `<U as IndexMut<V>>::index_mut(&mut base, index)`. In most cases this is fine as `V` will be equal to `T`, however this is not always true when `V/T` are references, as they may have different region.
This issue is quite subtle before #72280 as this code path is only used to fixup function receivers, but after #72280 we've made this a common path.
The solution is basically just rewrite it to `<U as IndexMut<T>>::index_mut(&mut base, index)`. `T` can retrieved in the fixup path using `node_substs`.
older toolchains not valid anymore
with the change to llvm 10 the parameter
LLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN do not do anything as min and soft error is the same.
see 86b120e6f3/llvm/cmake/modules/CheckCompilerVersion.cmake
Reland #74069
Investigation in #74716 has concluded that this PR is indeed not a regression (and in fact the rollup itself is not either).
This reverts the revert in #74611.
r? @nnethercote cc @eddyb
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #75036 (Prefer pattern matching over indexing)
- #75378 (Introduce `rustc_lexer::is_ident` and use it in couple of places)
- #75393 (Fully handle "?" shortcut)
- #75403 (Update comment for function)
- #75407 (Requested changes to [*mut T|*const T]::set_ptr_value)
- #75408 (Update MinGW comments in ci.yml)
- #75409 (Fix range term in alloc vec doc)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Requested changes to [*mut T|*const T]::set_ptr_value
This is a follow-up to PR #74774 (tracking issue #75091), acting on some change requests made after approval:
- adds `#[must_use]` attribute
- changes type of `val` pointer argument from `()` to `u8`
- adjusts documentation mentioning pointer provenance
move Deaggregate pass to post_borrowck_cleanup
Reopen of #71946
Only the second commit is from this PR, the other commit is a bugfix that's in the process of getting merged. I'll rebase once that's done
In #70073 MIR pass handling got reorganized, but with the goal of not changing behavior (except for disabling some optimizations on opt-level = 0). But there we realized that the Deaggregator pass, while conceptually more of a "cleanup" pass (and one that should be run before optimizations), was run in the middle of the optimization chain. Likely this is an accident of history, so I suggest we try and clean that up by making it a proper cleanup pass.
This does change mir-opt output, because deaggregation now runs before const-prop instead of after.
r? @wesleywiser @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt
cc @RalfJung
Add sample fix for E0749
Even though the description is clear but the solution may not be as straightforward.
Adding a suggested fix from documentation side.
r? @GuillaumeGomez
However, this suggestion should be shown in rustc itself for easy fix, the documentation should also reflect on the changes in rustc. Currently,
```
error[E0749]: negative impls cannot have any items
--> test.rs:6:5
|
6 | type Foo = i32; // error!
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0749`.
```
rustc should tell the user to remove it.
Tweak conditions for E0026 and E0769
When we have a tuple struct used with struct we don't want to suggest using the (valid) struct syntax with numeric field names. Instead we want to suggest the expected syntax.
Given
```rust
fn main() {
match MyOption::MySome(42) {
MyOption::MySome { x: 42 } => (),
_ => (),
}
}
```
We now emit E0769 "tuple variant `MyOption::MySome` written as struct variant" instead of E0026 "variant `MyOption::MySome` does not have a field named `x`".
move stack size check to const_eval machine
This is consistent with how we enforce the step limit. In particular, we do not want this limit checked for Miri-the-tool.
