minor: Fix go-to-def for shadowed `include*!`
Add a check in go-to-def feature, so that we don't assume any macro named `include`/`include_str`/`include_bytes` is the builtin one.
fix: use `BoundVar`s from current generic scope
Fixup for #13335, addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/13339#issuecomment-1266654607
Before the change in generic parameter order, `BoundVar`s for trait reference didn't change whether you are in an impl's scope or in an associated item's scope. Now that item's generic params come before its parent's, we need to shift their indices when we are in an associated item's scope.
fix: treat enum variants as generic item on their own
Fixup for #13335
It turns out I tried to merge two procedures into one utility function without noticing the incompatibility.
This time I *did* run analysis-stats on the four crates and confirmed it doesn't crash and this patch doesn't cause regression.
internal: change generic parameter order
tl;dr: This PR changes the `Substitution` for trait items and methods like so:
```rust
trait Trait<TP, const CP: usize> { // note the implicit Self as first parameter
type Type<TC, const CC: usize>;
fn f<TC, const CC: usize>() {}
}
impl<TP, const CP: usize> S {
fn f<TC, const CC: usize>() {}
}
```
- before this PR: `[Self, TP, CP, TC, CC]` for each trait item, `[TP, CP, TC, CC]` for `S::f`
- after this PR: `[TC, CC, Self, TP, CP]` for each trait item, `[TC, CC, TP, CP]` for `S::f`
---
This PR "inverts" the generic parameters/arguments of an item and its parent. This is to fulfill [chalk's expectation](d875af0ff1/chalk-solve/src/rust_ir.rs (L498-L502)) on the order of generic arguments in `Substitution`s for generic associated types and it's one step forward for GATs support (hopefully). Although chalk doesn't put any constraint for other items, it feels more natural to get everything aligned than special casing GATs.
One complication is that `TyBuilder` now demands its users to pass in parent's `Substitution` upon construction unless it's obvious that the the item has no parent (e.g. an ADT never has parent). All users *should* already know the parent of the item in question, and without this, it cannot be easily reasoned about whether we're pushing the argument for the item or for its parent.
Some additional notes:
- f8f5a5ea57: This isn't related to the change, but I felt it's nicer.
- 78977cd86c: There's one major change here other than the generic param order: Default arguments are now bound by the same `Binder` as the item in question rather than a `Binder` limited to parameters they can refer to (i.e. arguments that syntactically appear before them). Now that the order of generic parameters is changed, it would be somewhat complicated to make such `Binder`s as before, and the "full" `Binder`s shouldn't be a problem because we already make sure that the default arguments don't refer to the generic arguments after them with `fallback_bound_vars()`.
- 7556f74b16: This is split from 4385d3dcd0 to make it easy to revert if it turns out that the GATs with const generics panic is actually not resolved with this PR. cc #11878#11957
This commit "inverts" the order of generic parameters/arguments of an
item and its parent. This is to fulfill chalk's expectation on the
order of `Substitution` for generic associated types and it's one step
forward for their support (hopefully).
Although chalk doesn't put any constraint on the order of `Substitution`
for other items, it feels natural to get everything aligned rather than
special casing GATs.
One complication is that `TyBuilder` now demands its users to pass in
parent's `Substitution` upon construction unless it's obvious that the
the item has no parent (e.g. an ADT never has parent). All users
*should* already know the parent of the item in question, and without
this, it cannot be easily reasoned about whether we're pushing the
argument for the item or for its parent.
Quick comparison of how this commit changes `Substitution`:
```rust
trait Trait<TP, const CP: usize> {
type Type<TC, const CC: usize> = ();
fn f<TC, const CC: usize>() {}
}
```
- before this commit: `[Self, TP, CP, TC, CC]` for each trait item
- after this commit: `[TC, CC, Self, TP, CP]` for each trait item
fix: infer for-loop item type with `IntoIterator` and `Iterator`
Part of #13299
We've been inferring the type of the yielded values in for-loop as `<T as IntoIterator>::Item`. We infer the correct type most of the time when we normalize the projection type, but it turns out not always. We should infer the type as `<<T as IntoIterator>::IntoIter as Iterator>::Item`.
When one specifies `IntoIter` assoc type of `IntoIterator` but not `Item` in generic bounds, we fail to normalize `<T as IntoIterator>::Item` (even though `IntoIter` is defined like so: `type IntoIter: Iterator<Item = Self::Item>` - rustc does *not* normalize projections based on other projection's bound I believe; see [this playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=e88e19385094cb98fadbf647b4c2082e)).
Note that this doesn't fully fix # 13299 - given the following code, chalk can normalize `<I as IntoIterator>::IntoIter` to `S`, but cannot normalize `<S as Iterator>::Item` to `i32`.
```rust
struct S;
impl Iterator for S { type Item = i32; /* ... */ }
fn f<I: IntoIterator<IntoIter = S>>(it: I) {
for elem in it {}
//^^^^{unknown}
}
```
This is because chalk finds multiple answers that satisfy the query `AliasEq(<S as Iterator>::Item = ?X`: `?X = i32` and `?X = <I as IntoIterator>::Item` - which are supposed to be the same type due to the aforementioned bound on `IntoIter` but chalk is unable to figure it out.
