Add `lintcheck` to packages linted by `dogfood` test
Currently, `lintcheck` is not checked by the `dogfood` test. I assume that is not intentional. If it is intentional, then this PR can be ignored.
changelog: Add `lintcheck` to packages linted by `dogfood` test
Update cargo
5 commits in 3ff044334f0567ce1481c78603aeee7211b91623..071eeaf210708219a5a1b2c4728ca2f97df7f2ae 2022-10-17 20:25:00 +0000 to 2022-10-22 01:17:55 +0000
- fix: Remove leading newline in vendor output (rust-lang/cargo#11273)
- Fix publishing with a dependency on a sparse registry (rust-lang/cargo#11268)
- Add missing edition (rust-lang/cargo#11265)
- fix(publish): Check remote git registry more than once post-publish (rust-lang/cargo#11255)
- Fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#11258)
r? `@ghost`
5 commits in 3ff044334f0567ce1481c78603aeee7211b91623..071eeaf210708219a5a1b2c4728ca2f97df7f2ae
2022-10-17 20:25:00 +0000 to 2022-10-22 01:17:55 +0000
- fix: Remove leading newline in vendor output (rust-lang/cargo#11273)
- Fix publishing with a dependency on a sparse registry (rust-lang/cargo#11268)
- Add missing edition (rust-lang/cargo#11265)
- fix(publish): Check remote git registry more than once post-publish (rust-lang/cargo#11255)
- Fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#11258)
Reduce false positives in msys2 detection
Currently msys2 will be detected by getting the file path and looking to see if it contains the substrings "msys-" and "-ptr" (or "cygwin-" and "-pty"). This risks false positives, especially with filesystem files and if `GetFileInformationByHandleEx` returns a [full path](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/ddi/ntifs/nf-ntifs-ntqueryinformationfile#remarks).
This PR adds a check to see if the handle is a pipe before doing the substring search. Additionally, for "msys2-" or "cygwin-" it only checks if the file name starts with the substring rather than looking at the whole path.
Adjust argument type for mutable with_metadata_of (#75091)
The method takes two pointer arguments: one `self` supplying the pointer value, and a second pointer supplying the metadata.
The new parameter type more clearly reflects the actual requirements. The provenance of the metadata parameter is disregarded completely. Using a mutable pointer in the call site can be coerced to a const pointer while the reverse is not true.
In some cases, the current parameter type can thus lead to a very slightly confusing additional cast. [Example](cad93775eb).
```rust
// Manually taking an unsized object from a `ManuallyDrop` into another allocation.
let val: &core::mem::ManuallyDrop<T> = …;
let ptr = val as *const _ as *mut T;
let ptr = uninit.as_ptr().with_metadata_of(ptr);
```
This could then instead be simplified to:
```rust
// Manually taking an unsized object from a `ManuallyDrop` into another allocation.
let val: &core::mem::ManuallyDrop<T> = …;
let ptr = uninit.as_ptr().with_metadata_of(&**val);
```
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75091
``@dtolnay`` you're reviewed #95249, would you mind chiming in?
Allow semicolon after closure within parentheses in macros
#88546 added some parsing logic that if we're parsing a closure, and we're within parentheses, and a semicolon follows, then we must be parsing something erroneous like: `f(|| a; b)`, so it replaces the closure body with an error expression. However, it's valid to parse those tokens if we're within a macro, as in #103222.
This is a bit unsatisfying fix. Is there a more robust way of checking that we're within a macro?
I would also be open to removing this "_It is likely that the closure body is a block but where the braces have been removed_" check altogether at the expense of more verbose errors, since it seems very suspicious in the first place...
Fixes#103222.
rustdoc: render bounds of cross-crate GAT params
Follow-up to #102439.
Render the trait bounds of type parameters of cross-crate (generic) associated types.
`````@rustbot````` label T-rustdoc A-cross-crate-reexports
r? `````@GuillaumeGomez`````
Slightly tweak comments wrt `lint_overflowing_range_endpoint`
From the review: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101986#discussion_r975610611
It _seemed_ that the lint was not emitted when the `if` check failed, but _actually_ this happens already in a special case and the lint is emitted outside of this function, if this function doesn't. I've cleared up the code/comments a bit, so it's more obvious :)
r? ```@estebank```
Remove byte swap of valtree hash on big endian
This addresses problem reported in #103183. The code was originally introduced in e14b34c386. (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96591)
On big-endian environment, this operation sequence actually put the other half from 128-bit result, thus we got different hash result on LE and BE.
stop using `ty::UnevaluatedConst` directly
best reviewed commit by commit.
simplifies #99798 because we now don't have to expand `ty::UnevaluatedConst` to `ty::Const`.
I also remember some other places where using `ty::UnevaluatedConst` directly was annoying and caused issues, though I don't quite remember what they were rn '^^
r? `@oli-obk` cc `@JulianKnodt`
Get rid of native_library projection queries
They don't seem particularly useful as I don't expect native libraries to change frequently.
Maybe they do provide significant value of keeping incremental compilation green though, I'm not sure.
The latest version of `rental` (v0.5.6) contains a fix that allows it to
compile without relying on the pretty-print back-compat hack.
Hopefully, there are no longer any crates relying on the affected
versions of the (much less popular) `procedural-masquerade` crate. This
should allow us to target the pretty-print back-compat hack specifically
to older versions of `rental`, and specifically mention upgrading to
`rental` v0.5.6 in the lint message.
Introduce deduced parameter attributes, and use them for deducing `readonly` on indirect immutable freeze by-value function parameters.
Introduce deduced parameter attributes, and use them for deducing `readonly` on
indirect immutable freeze by-value function parameters.
Right now, `rustc` only examines function signatures and the platform ABI when
determining the LLVM attributes to apply to parameters. This results in missed
optimizations, because there are some attributes that can be determined via
analysis of the MIR making up the function body. In particular, `readonly`
could be applied to most indirectly-passed by-value function arguments
(specifically, those that are freeze and are observed not to be mutated), but
it currently is not.
This patch introduces the machinery that allows `rustc` to determine those
attributes. It consists of a query, `deduced_param_attrs`, that, when
evaluated, analyzes the MIR of the function to determine supplementary
attributes. The results of this query for each function are written into the
crate metadata so that the deduced parameter attributes can be applied to
cross-crate functions. In this patch, we simply check the parameter for
mutations to determine whether the `readonly` attribute should be applied to
parameters that are indirect immutable freeze by-value. More attributes could
conceivably be deduced in the future: `nocapture` and `noalias` come to mind.
Adding `readonly` to indirect function parameters where applicable enables some
potential optimizations in LLVM that are discussed in [issue 103103] and [PR
103070] around avoiding stack-to-stack memory copies that appear in functions
like `core::fmt::Write::write_fmt` and `core::panicking::assert_failed`. These
functions pass a large structure unchanged by value to a subfunction that also
doesn't mutate it. Since the structure in this case is passed as an indirect
parameter, it's a pointer from LLVM's perspective. As a result, the
intermediate copy of the structure that our codegen emits could be optimized
away by LLVM's MemCpyOptimizer if it knew that the pointer is `readonly
nocapture noalias` in both the caller and callee. We already pass `nocapture
noalias`, but we're missing `readonly`, as we can't determine whether a
by-value parameter is mutated by examining the signature in Rust. I didn't have
much success with having LLVM infer the `readonly` attribute, even with fat
LTO; it seems that deducing it at the MIR level is necessary.
No large benefits should be expected from this optimization *now*; LLVM needs
some changes (discussed in [PR 103070]) to more aggressively use the `noalias
nocapture readonly` combination in its alias analysis. I have some LLVM patches
for these optimizations and have had them looked over. With all the patches
applied locally, I enabled LLVM to remove all the `memcpy`s from the following
code:
```rust
fn main() {
println!("Hello {}", 3);
}
```
which is a significant codegen improvement over the status quo. I expect that if this optimization kicks in in multiple places even for such a simple program, then it will apply to Rust code all over the place.
[issue 103103]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103103
[PR 103070]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103070
These targets have system limits on the thread names, 16 and 64 bytes
respectively, and `pthread_setname_np` returns an error if the name is
longer. However, we're not in a context that can propagate errors when
we call this, and we used to implicitly truncate on Linux with `prctl`,
so now we manually truncate these names ahead of time.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #102635 (make `order_dependent_trait_objects` show up in future-breakage reports)
- #103335 (Replaced wrong test with the correct mcve)
- #103339 (Fix some typos)
- #103340 (WinConsole::new is not actually fallible)
- #103341 (Add test for issue 97607)
- #103351 (Require Drop impls to have the same constness on its bounds as the bounds on the struct have)
- #103359 (Remove incorrect comment in `Vec::drain`)
- #103364 (rustdoc: clean up rustdoc-toggle CSS)
- #103370 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.out-of-band { font-weight: normal }`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.out-of-band { font-weight: normal }`
This CSS was added in 083c3952e0 to normalize the appearance of out-of-band elements that were nested directly below headers.
Now, the only use of `out-of-band` is in the main page header, and it is nested below a wrapper, not the `<h1>` itself.
Remove incorrect comment in `Vec::drain`
r? ``@scottmcm``
Turns out this comment wasn't correct for 6 years, since #34951, which switched from using `slice::IterMut` into using `slice::Iter`.
Add test for issue 97607
Fixes#97607
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Not sure which UI test dir to put this under, kindly let me know of a better dir if necessary and I will change it. Thanks.
Replaced wrong test with the correct mcve
Closes#89008.
The old test was wrong and the compiler was [correctly raising an error](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89008#issuecomment-1285128060). The bug in the issue was resolved at some point but due to the wrong test the issue was never closed.
This pr replaces that test with the correct MCVE (made by ``@jackh726).``
The error raised by the bug changed between when the bug was posted (2021-09-08) and when the MCVE [was posted](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89008#issuecomment-950110735) (2021-10-23).
I ran them both through `nightly-2021-09-08` and they produce identical error messages. They also produce identical but different from before error messages when ran through `nightly-2021-10-23`.
<details>
<summary>Error message with <code>nightly-2021-09-08</code></summary>
The code with the original bug report:
```
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `Repr` cannot be known at compilation time
--> src/main.rs:23:43
|
23 | fn line_stream<'a, Repr>(&'a self) -> Self::LineStreamFut<'a, Repr> {
| ---- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
| |
| this type parameter needs to be `std::marker::Sized`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
error: could not compile `test-234234` due to previous error
```
MVCE:
```
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `Repr` cannot be known at compilation time
--> src/main.rs:30:43
|
30 | fn line_stream<'a, Repr>(&'a self) -> Self::LineStreamFut<'a, Repr> {
| ---- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
| |
| this type parameter needs to be `std::marker::Sized`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
error: could not compile `test-234234` due to previous error
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error message with <code>nightly-2021-10-23</code></summary>
The code with the original bug report:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<impl futures::Future as futures::Future>::Output == impl futures::Stream`
--> src/main.rs:23:43
|
19 | type LineStream<'a, Repr> = impl Stream<Item = Repr>;
| ------------------------ the expected opaque type
...
23 | fn line_stream<'a, Repr>(&'a self) -> Self::LineStreamFut<'a, Repr> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected opaque type, found struct `futures::stream::Empty`
|
= note: expected opaque type `impl futures::Stream`
found struct `futures::stream::Empty<_>`
error: could not find defining uses
--> src/main.rs:19:33
|
19 | type LineStream<'a, Repr> = impl Stream<Item = Repr>;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0271`.
error: could not compile `test-234234` due to 2 previous errors
```
MCVE:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<impl Future as Future>::Output == impl Stream`
--> src/main.rs:30:43
|
28 | type LineStream<'a, Repr> = impl Stream<Item = Repr>;
| ------------------------ the expected opaque type
29 | type LineStreamFut<'a, Repr> = impl Future<Output = Self::LineStream<'a, Repr>>;
30 | fn line_stream<'a, Repr>(&'a self) -> Self::LineStreamFut<'a, Repr> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected opaque type, found struct `Empty`
|
= note: expected opaque type `impl Stream`
found struct `Empty<_>`
error: could not find defining uses
--> src/main.rs:28:33
|
28 | type LineStream<'a, Repr> = impl Stream<Item = Repr>;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0271`.
error: could not compile `test-234234` due to 2 previous errors
```
</details>
make `order_dependent_trait_objects` show up in future-breakage reports
tried to change it to a hard error in #102474 but breaking the more than 1000 dependents of `traitobject` doesn't feel great 😅
This lint has existed since more than 3 years now and the way this is currently implemented is buggy and will break with #102472. imo we should upgrade it to also report for dependencies and maybe also backport this to beta. Then after maybe 2-3 stable versions I would like to finally convert this lint to a hard error.
