The error message was misleading, so I adjusted it, and I also added the long diagnostics for this error (resolves one point in #24407).
I was unsure about how to phrase the error message. Is “generic parameter binding” the correct term for this?
So, I realize this is really late in the game so it's unlikely to be accepted but `FromRawFd`/`FromRawHandle` are necessary for fine grain control over file creation. For example, the current `OpenOptions` does not provide a way to avoid file creation races (there's no way to specify `O_EXCL` or the windows equivalent). Stabilizing these traits and their implementations will give 1.0 users fine-grain control over file creation without committing to any new complex APIs. Additionally, `AsRawFd`/`AsRawHandle` are already stable so I feel that that stabilizing their inverses is a reasonably small change.
Disclaimer: I'm asking because my crate, tempfile, depends on this feature.
These constants were added in 6f54ce9aa5 and
e8fbd1ce04 to a consts module that is behind a
gate.
I have not confirmed that these constants do indeed work on either OSX or iOS.
The [UnsafeCell documentation says it is undefined behavior](http://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/cell/struct.UnsafeCell.html), so people shouldn't do it.
This happened to catch one case in libstd that was doing this, and I switched that to use an UnsafeCell internally.
Closes#13146
Added documentation of the panicking overflow to the `count` and `position`
methods of `IteratorExt`, also make them more obvious in the code.
Also mention that the `Iterator::next` method of the struct returned by
`IteratorExt::enumerate` can panic due to overflow.
Previously, `try_write` actually only obtained shared read access (but would return a `RwLockWriteGuard` if that access was successful).
Also updates the docs for `try_read` and `try_write`, which were leftover from when those methods returned `Option` instead of `Result`.
These constants were added in 6f54ce9aa5 and
e8fbd1ce04 to a consts module that is behind a
gate.
I have not confirmed that these constants do indeed work on either OSX or iOS.
It appears that some of the constants may actually belong in a POSIX module,
but I didn't make these changes here because I don't have access to the POSIX
standard.
Many bounds are currently of the form `T: ?Sized + AsRef<OsStr>` where the
argument is `&T`, but the pattern elsewhere (primarily `std::fs`) has been to
remove the `?Sized` bound and take `T` instead (allowing usage with both
references and owned values). This commit generalizes the possible apis in
`std::env` from `&T` to `T` in this fashion.
The `split_paths` function remains the same as the return value borrows the
input value, so ta borrowed reference is required.
Explicitely spell out behaviour on overflow for `usize`-returning iterator
functions.
Mention that panics are guaranteed if debug assertions are active, otherwise a
wrong result might be returned.
collections: Convert SliceConcatExt to use associated types
Coherence now allows this, we have `SliceConcatExt<T> for [V] where T: Sized + Clone` and` SliceConcatExt<str> for [S]`, these don't conflict because
str is never Sized.
This PR adds a program which uses the JSON output from #24884 to generate a webpage with descriptions of each diagnostic error.
The page is constructed by hand, with calls to `rustdoc`'s markdown renderers where needed. I opted to generate HTML directly as I think it's more flexible than generating a markdown file and feeding it into the `rustdoc` executable. I envision adding the ability to filter errors by their properties (description, no description, used, unused), which is infeasible using the whole-file markdown approach due to the need to wrap each error in a `<div>` (markdown inside tags isn't rendered).
Architecturally, I wasn't sure how to add this generator to the distribution. For the moment I've settled on a separate Rust program in `src/etc/` that gets compiled and run by a custom makefile rule. This approach doesn't seem too hackish, but I'm unsure if my usage of makefile variables is correct, particularly the call to `rustc` (and the `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` weirdness). Other options I considered were:
* Integrate the error-index generator into `rustdoc` so that it gets invoked via a flag and can be built as part of `rustdoc`.
* Add the error-index-generator as a "tool" to the `TOOLS` array, and make use of the facilities for building tools. The main reason I didn't do this was because it seemed like I'd need to add lots of stuff. I'm happy to investigate this further if it's the preferred method.
Specifically, make count, nth, and last call the corresponding methods on the underlying iterator where possible. This way, if the underlying iterator has an optimized count, nth, or last implementations (e.g. slice::Iter), these methods will propagate these optimizations.
Additionally, change Skip::next to take advantage of a potentially optimized nth method on the underlying iterator.
This covers:
* core::iter::Chain: count, last, nth
* core::iter::Enumerate: count, nth
* core::iter::Peekable: count, last, nth
* core::iter::Skip: count, last, next (should call nth), nth
* core::iter::Take: nth
* core::iter::Fuse: count, last, nth
of #24214.
[breaking-change] Technically breaking, since code that had been using
these transmutes before will no longer compile. However, it was
undefined behavior, so really, it's a good thing. Fixing your code would
require some re-working to use an UnsafeCell instead.
Closes#13146
According to rust-lang/rfcs#235, `VecDeque` should have this method (`VecDeque` was called `RingBuf` at the time) but it was never implemented.
I marked this stable since "1.0.0" because it's stable in `Vec`.
