This patch
1. renames libunicode to librustc_unicode,
2. deprecates several pieces of libunicode (see below), and
3. removes references to deprecated functions from
librustc_driver and libsyntax. This may change pretty-printed
output from these modules in cases involving wide or combining
characters used in filenames, identifiers, etc.
The following functions are marked deprecated:
1. char.width() and str.width():
--> use unicode-width crate
2. str.graphemes() and str.grapheme_indices():
--> use unicode-segmentation crate
3. str.nfd_chars(), str.nfkd_chars(), str.nfc_chars(), str.nfkc_chars(),
char.compose(), char.decompose_canonical(), char.decompose_compatible(),
char.canonical_combining_class():
--> use unicode-normalization crate
I'm on a quest to slowly refactor a lot of the inference code. A first step for that is moving the "pure data structures" out so as to simplify what's left. This PR moves `snapshot_vec`, `graph`, and `unify` into their own crate (`librustc_data_structures`). They can then be unit-tested, benchmarked, etc more easily. As a benefit, I improved the performance of unification slightly on the benchmark I added vs the original code.
r? @nrc
This allows `io::Error` values to be stored in `Arc` properly.
Because this requires `Sync` of any value passed to `io::Error::new()`
and modifies the relevant `convert::From` impls, this is a
[breaking-change]
Fixes#24049.
This is an implementation of [RFC 1030][rfc] which adds these traits to the
prelude and additionally removes all inherent `into_iter` methods on collections
in favor of the trait implementation (which is now accessible by default).
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1030
This is technically a breaking change due to the prelude additions and removal
of inherent methods, but it is expected that essentially no code breaks in
practice.
[breaking-change]
Closes#24538
Add conditional overflow-checking to signed negate operator.
I argue this can land independently of #24420 , because one can write the implementation of `wrapped_neg()` inline if necessary (as illustrated in two cases on this PR).
This needs to go into beta channel.
This makes it illegal to have unconstrained lifetimes that appear in an associated type definition. Arguably, we should prohibit all unconstrained lifetimes -- but it would break various macros. It'd be good to evaluate how large a break change it would be. But this seems like the minimal change we need to do to establish soundness, so we should land it regardless. Another variant would be to prohibit all lifetimes that appear in any impl item, not just associated types. I don't think that's necessary for soundness -- associated types are different because they can be projected -- but it would feel a bit more consistent and "obviously" safe. I'll experiment with that in the meantime.
r? @aturon
Fixes#22077.
which get mentioned in an associated type are constrained. Arguably we
should just require that all regions are constrained, but that is more
of a breaking change.
Fix broken links in various parts of the docs.
I also found a dead link [here](http://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/alloc/boxed/) (the first link on the page), but the chapter of the book that it used to point at seems to be gone, and I'm not sure what should happen to that link.
When emmitting a note, previously it was not known if the note was for an error or a
warning. If it was for a warning, then with `-Awarnings` it should not have been print.
The `emit_for` function allows someone to specify which level should determine its visibility.
An example:
```rust
extern crate \"std\" as std2;
fn main() {}
```
When compiling with `-Awarnings`, this would previously emit `note: use an identifier not in quotes instead` (and nothing else).
With this patch, it will be completely silent as expected.
