translations(rustc_session): migrates rustc_session to use SessionDiagnostic - Pt. 2
# Description
This is the second part of the `rustc_session` [migration](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100717#issuecomment-1220279883).
**Please only review this [commit](5018581957) that belongs to the part 2. The other ones are from the PR [#100753](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100753) that is not yet merged.**
In this PR, we migrate the files `session.rs` and `config.rs`.
Please not that we have to `allow` the lints rules in some functions from `session.rs` because they are (at least I believe) part of the diagnostic machinery.
This commit removes the allows rules for the SessionDiagnostic lint
that were being used in the session.rs file.
Thanks to the PR #101230 we do not need to annotate the methods with
the allow rule as they are part of the diagnostic machinery.
Suggest removing unnecessary prefix let in patterns
Helps with #101291, though I think `@estebank` probably wants this:
> Finally, I think it'd be nice if we could detect that we don't know for sure and "just" swallow the rest of the expression (find the next ; accounting for nested braces) or the end of the item (easier).
... to be implemented before we close that issue out completely.
Add warning against unexpected --cfg with --check-cfg
This PR adds a warning when an unexpected `--cfg` is specified but not in the specified list of `--check-cfg`.
This is the follow-up PR I mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99519.
r? `@petrochenkov`
migrate rustc_query_system to use SessionDiagnostic
issues:
* variable list is not supported in fluent
* ~~cannot have two sub diagnostic with the same tag (eg. 2 .note or 2 .help)~~
allow multiple tag with SessionSubdiagnostic derive
- ... when creating diagnostics in rustc_metadata
- use the error_code! macro
- pass macro output to diag.code()
- use fluent from within manual implementation of SessionDiagnostic
- emit the untested errors in case they occur in the wild
- stop panicking in the probably-not-dead code, add fixme to write test
translations(rustc_session): migrates `rustc_session` to use `SessionDiagnostic` - Pt. 1
## Description
This is the first PR for the migration of the module `rustc_session`. You can follow my progress [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100717#issuecomment-1220279883).
The PR migrates the files `cgu_reuse_tracker` and `parse.rs` to use `SessionDiagnostic `.
Migrate rustc_monomorphize to use SessionDiagnostic
### Description
- Migrates diagnostics in `rustc_monomorphize` to use `SessionDiagnostic`
- Adds an `impl IntoDiagnosticArg for PathBuf`
### TODO / Help!
- [x] I'm having trouble figuring out how to apply an optional note. 😕 Help!?
- Resolved. It was bad docs. Fixed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1437/files
- [x] `errors:RecursionLimit` should be `#[fatal ...]`, but that doesn't exist so it's `#[error ...]` at the moment.
- Maybe I can switch after this is merged in? --> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100694
- Or maybe I need to manually implement `SessionDiagnostic` instead of deriving it?
- [x] How does one go about converting an error inside of [a call to struct_span_lint_hir](8064a49508/compiler/rustc_monomorphize/src/collector.rs (L917-L927))?
- [x] ~What placeholder do you use in the fluent template to refer to the value in a vector? It seems like [this code](0b79f758c9/compiler/rustc_macros/src/diagnostics/diagnostic_builder.rs (L83-L114)) ought to have the answer (or something near it)...but I can't figure it out.~ You can't. Punted.
Thought of doing this by having a struct and an enum with Default and Alt cases, but not sure if we wanted to have the text in code instead of having “demangling()” and “demangling-alt()” in the ftl file.
Don’t like the current way of having structs representing the same-ish and using long names to distinguish their expectations, instead of putting this in an enum and handling the different cases inside the type.
I am fine with whichever option the team prefers; also understand having them as separate structs keeps it simple.
