Don't suggest doc(hidden) or unstable variants in wildcard lint
Clippy's wildcard lint would suggest doc(hidden) and unstable variants for non_exhaustive enums, even though those aren't part of the public interface (yet) and should only be matched on using a `_`, just like potential future additions to the enum. There was already some logic to exclude a *single* doc(hidden) variant. This extends that to all hidden variants, and also hides `#[unstable]` variants.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/85746#issuecomment-868886893
This PR includes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7406 as the first commit.
Here's the diff that this PR adds on top of that PR: https://github.com/m-ou-se/rust-clippy/compare/std-errorkind...m-ou-se:doc-hidden-variants
---
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: No longer suggest unstable and doc(hidden) variants in wildcard lint. wildcard_enum_match_arm, match_wildcard_for_single_variants
This fixes a bug where match_wildcard_for_single_variants produced a
bad suggestion where besides the missing variant, one or more hidden
variants were left.
This also adds tests to the ui-tests match_wildcard_for_single_variants
and wildcard_enum_match_arm to make sure that the correct suggestion is
produced.
New lint: `disallowed_script_idents`
This PR implements a new lint to restrict locales that can be used in the code,
as proposed in #7376.
Current concerns / unresolved questions:
- ~~Mixed usage of `script` (as a Unicode term) and `locale` (as something that is easier to understand for the broad audience). I'm not sure whether these terms are fully interchangeable and whether in the current form it is more confusing than helpful.~~ `script` is now used everywhere.
- ~~Having to mostly copy-paste `AllowedScript`. Probably it's not a big problem, as the list of scripts is standardized and is unlikely to change, and even if we'd stick to the `unicode_script::Script`, we'll still have to implement custom deserialization, and I don't think that it will be shorter in terms of the amount of LoC.~~ `unicode::Script` is used together with a filtering deserialize function.
- Should we stick to the list of "recommended scripts" from [UAX #31](http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr31/#Table_Recommended_Scripts) in the configuration?
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: ``[`disallowed_script_idents`]``
r? `@Manishearth`
Improve lint message for match-same-arms lint
fixes#7331
Follow-up to #7377
This PR improves the lint message for `match-same-arms` lint and adds `todo!(..)` example to the lint docs.
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: None
Do not spawn blacklisted_name lint in test context
---
fixed#7305
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: `blacklisted_name` lint is not spawned in the test context anymore.
Fix detecting of the 'test' attribute
Update UI test to actually check that warning is not triggered in the test code
Fix approach for detecting the test module
Add nested test case
Remove code duplication by extracting 'is_test_module_or_function' into 'clippy_utils'
Cleanup the code
Problem:
for code like
````
fn main() {
println!("Hello, world!");
}
````
clippy will issue a warning to use a clippy.toml option instead:
````
warning: lint `clippy::wrong_pub_self_convention` has been removed: set the `avoid_breaking_exported_api` config option to `false` to enable the `wrong_self_convention` lint for public items
--> src/main.rs:2:9
|
2 | #![warn(clippy::wrong_pub_self_convention)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(renamed_and_removed_lints)]` on by default
````
But using the lint name as seen in the warning message
echo "avoid_breaking_exported_api = true\n" > clippy.toml
Will cause an error:
````
error: error reading Clippy's configuration file `/tmp/clippytest/clippy.toml`: unknown field `avoid_breaking_exported_api`, expected one of `avoid-breaking-exported-api`, ...
````
Replace the underscores with dashes in the deprecation message.
changelog: avoid_breaking_exported_api: suggest correct clippy config toml option in the deprecation message
Add macro_braces lint to check for irregular brace use in certain macros
The name is a bit long but this sounds good as `#[allow(unconventional_macro_braces)]` and it seems more clear that we are talking about the macro call not macro definitions, any feedback let me know. Thanks!
fixes#7278
changelog: Add ``[`unconventional_macro_braces`]`` lint that checks for uncommon brace usage with macros.
Rename unconventional -> nonstandard, add config field
Add standard_macro_braces fields so users can specify macro names and
brace combinations to lint for in the clippy.toml file.
Fix errors caused by nonstandard_macro_braces in other lint tests
Fix users ability to override the default nonstandard macro braces
Add type position macros impl `check_ty`
Vec extend to append
This PR adds a check to suggest changes of vector from
```
vec.extend(other_vec.drain(..))
```
could be written as
```
vec![].append(&mut vec![]);
```
changelog: Add vec_extend_to_append lint
issue: #7209
Don't trigger `field_reassign_with_default` in macros
Fixes#7155
Producing a good suggestion for this lint is already hard when no macros
are involved. With macros the lint message and the suggestion are just
confusing. Since both, producing a good suggestion and figuring out if
this pattern can be re-written inside a macro is nearly impossible, just
bail out.
changelog: [`field_reassign_with_default`] No longer triggers in macros
---
No that our reviewing queue is under control, I want to start hacking on Clippy myself again. Starting with an easy issue to get back in :)
Fix false positive on `semicolon_if_nothing_returned`
Currently the [`semicolon_if_nothing_returned`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#semicolon_if_nothing_returned) lint fires in unwanted situations where a block only spans one line. An example of this was given in #7324. This code:
```rust
use std::mem::MaybeUninit;
use std::ptr;
fn main() {
let mut s = MaybeUninit::<String>::uninit();
let _d = || unsafe { ptr::drop_in_place(s.as_mut_ptr()) };
}
```
yields the following clippy error:
```
error: consider adding a `;` to the last statement for consistent formatting
--> src/main.rs:6:26
|
6 | let _d = || unsafe { ptr::drop_in_place(s.as_mut_ptr()) };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: add a `;` here: `ptr::drop_in_place(s.as_mut_ptr());`
|
= note: `-D clippy::semicolon-if-nothing-returned` implied by `-D clippy::pedantic`
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#semicolon_if_nothing_returned
```
I updated the lint to check if the statement is inside an `unsafe` block, a closure or a normal block and if the block only spans one line, in that case the lint is not emitted.
This closes#7324.
changelog: enhanced semicolon if nothing returned according to #7324.
Refactoring identity function lints
I've noticed that we have several lints that all check for identity functions and each used their own check implementation. I moved the `is_expr_identity_function` function to `clippy_utils` and adapted all lints to reuse that one function. This should make the addition of new lints like this also easier in the future.
I've also moved the `map_identity` lint into the `methods` module. It's probably the best to review this PR by checking each commit individually. And that's it, have a great day 🙃
changelog: none
fix `while_let_on_iterator` suggestion in a closure
fixes: #7249
A future improvement would be to check if the closure is being used as `FnOnce`, in which case the original suggestion would be correct.
changelog: Suggest `&mut iter` inside a closure for `while_let_on_iterator`
