This lint adds warning if types are redundantly repeated in trait bounds i.e. `T: Copy, T: Clone` instead of `T: Copy + Clone`. This is a late pass trait lint and has necessitated the addition of code to allow hashing of TyKinds without taking into account Span information.
Move the method checking into a new lint called
`redundant_closures_for_method_calls` and put it in the pedantic group.
This aspect of the lint seems more controversial than the rest.
cc #3942
* Late Lint pass, catches:
* One liner: 0 -> null -> transmute
* One liner: std:null() -> transmute
* Const (which resolves to null) -> transmute
* UI Test case for Lint
* Updated test for issue 3849, because now the lint that code generated is in Clippy.
* Expanded `const.rs` miri-based Constant Folding code, to cover
raw pointers
* Ran automatic naming update
* Formalized rename of `cyclomatic_complexity` to `cognitive_complexity`
** Added the rename to `lib.rs`
** Added rename test
* Added warning for deprecated key `cyclomatic_complexity_threshold` and tests for it
* Added deprecation status for Clippy's builtin attribute
* Updated tests for new builtin attribute renaming
**What it does:** Checks for generics with `std::ops::Drop` as bounds.
**Why is this bad?** `Drop` bounds do not really accomplish anything.
A type may have compiler-generated drop glue without implementing the
`Drop` trait itself. The `Drop` trait also only has one method,
`Drop::drop`, and that function is by fiat not callable in user code.
So there is really no use case for using `Drop` in trait bounds.
**Known problems:** None.
**Example:**
```rust
fn foo<T: Drop>() {}
```
* master: (58 commits)
Rustfmt all the things
Don't make decisions on values that don't represent the decision
Improving comments.
Rustup
Added rustfix to the test.
Improve span shortening.
Added "make_return" and "blockify" convenience methods in Sugg and used them in "needless_bool".
Actually check for constants.
Fixed potential mistakes with nesting. Added tests.
formatting fix
Update clippy_lints/src/needless_bool.rs
formatting fix
Fixing typo in CONTRIBUTING.md
Fix breakage due to rust-lang/rust#57651
needless bool lint suggestion is wrapped in brackets if it is an "else" clause of an "if-else" statement
Fix automatic suggestion on `use_self`.
Remove negative integer literal checks.
Fix `implicit_return` false positives.
Run rustfmt
Fixed breakage due to rust-lang/rust#57489
...
Merge new_without_default_derive into new_without_default
Closes#3525, deprecating new_without_default_derive and moving both lints into new_without_default.
I believe if the user already decided to put underscores in their
literal, Clippy should be willing to believe that they put a number of
underscores that they felt was readable.
This lint looks for:
let mut vec = Vec::with_capacity(len);
vec.set_len(len);
The suggested replacement is `vec![0; len]`.
This is far too opinionated to be a deny-by-default lint because the performance
characteristics of the suggested replacement are totally different.
I am not convinced that this lint has value beyond what deny(unsafe_code) gives
you. Unsafe code is unsafe but please don't deny-by-default lint it if that's
the only reason.
Warning was:
warning: the feature `macro_at_most_once_rep` has been stable since 1.32.0 and no longer requires an attribute to enable
--> clippy_lints/src/lib.rs:19:12
|
19 | #![feature(macro_at_most_once_rep)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: #[warn(stable_features)] on by default
Add lint to detect slow zero-filled vector initialization. It detects
when a vector is zero-filled with extended with `repeat(0).take(len)`
or `resize(len, 0)`.
This zero-fillings are usually slower than simply using `vec![0; len]`.
I noticed that I suppress this lint in many of my projects.
https://github.com/search?q=needless_pass_by_value+user%3Adtolnay&type=Codehttps://github.com/search?q=needless_pass_by_value+user%3Aserde-rs&type=Code
Upon further inspection, this lint has a *long* history of false
positives (and several remaining).
Generally I feel that this lint is the definition of pedantic and should
not be linted by default.
#[derive(Debug)]
enum How {
ThisWay,
ThatWay,
}
// Are we really better off forcing the call sites to write f(&_)...?
fn f(how: How) {
println!("You want to do it {:?}", how);
}
fn main() {
f(How::ThatWay);
}
This finishes up the rewrite of `update_lints.py` in Rust. More
specifically, this
* adds the `--check` flag and handling to clippy_dev
* tracks file changes over the different calls to `replace_region_in_file`
* only writes changes to files if the `--check` flag is *not* used
* runs `./util/dev update_lints --check` on CI instead of the old script
* replaces usage of the `update_lints.py` script with an error
`./util/dev update_lints` behaves 99% the same as the python script.
The only difference that I'm aware of is an ordering change to
`clippy_lints/src/lib.rs` because underscores seem to be sorted
differently in Rust and in Python.
🏁
3388: RIIR update lints: Generate deprecated lints r=phansch a=phansch
The update script now also generates the 'register_removed' section in
`clippy_lints/src/lib.rs`.
Also, instead of using `let mut store ...`, I added a new identifier
line so that the replacement will continue to work in case `let mut
store ...` ever changes.
cc #2882
Co-authored-by: Philipp Hansch <dev@phansch.net>
The update script now also generates the 'register_removed' section in
`clippy_lints/src/lib.rs`.
Also, instead of using `let mut store ...`, I added a new identifier
line so that the replacement will continue to work in case `let mut
store ...` ever changes.
3349: Fixes#3347: Lint for wildcard dependencies in Cargo.toml r=ordovicia a=ordovicia
Add a lint for wildcard dependencies in Cargo.toml.
How should I write a test for this lint?
Fixes#3347
Co-authored-by: Hidehito Yabuuchi <hdht.ybuc@gmail.com>
Handles cases of `.collect().len()`, `.collect().is_empty()`, and
`.collect().contains()`. This lint is intended to be generic enough to
be added to at a later time with other similar patterns that could be
optimized.
Closes#3034
Make explicit_iter_loop and explicit_into_iter_loop allow-by-default, so
that people can turn them on if they want to enforce that style; avoid
presenting them as *the* idiomatic Rust style, rather than just *a* style.
