This large commit implements and `html` output option for rustdoc_ng. The
executable has been altered to be invoked as "rustdoc_ng html <crate>" and
it will dump everything into the local "doc" directory. JSON can still be
generated by changing 'html' to 'json'.
This also fixes a number of bugs in rustdoc_ng relating to comment stripping,
along with some other various issues that I found along the way.
The `make doc` command has been altered to generate the new documentation into
the `doc/ng/$(CRATE)` directories.
Previews
* http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~acrichto/doc/std/
* http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~acrichto/doc/extra/
Missing features
* Different versions of documentation on the same page (all possibly indexed as well?) I think that this needs to be thought out before action is taken. It's an awesome idea, but it should be done carefully.
* Source links are missing. This is a little dependent on getting versions working. In theory we should link back to github, but we should always link back to the exact version the documentation was generated from.
* Integration with other tools. It would be awesome to have rustpkg-style inference of the package name and version so they don't have to be specified anywhere. Additionally, I should be able to build documentation for a pkgid, not necessarily a crate file.
cc @cmr/@Seldaek
This large commit implements and `html` output option for rustdoc_ng. The
executable has been altered to be invoked as "rustdoc_ng html <crate>" and
it will dump everything into the local "doc" directory. JSON can still be
generated by changing 'html' to 'json'.
This also fixes a number of bugs in rustdoc_ng relating to comment stripping,
along with some other various issues that I found along the way.
The `make doc` command has been altered to generate the new documentation into
the `doc/ng/$(CRATE)` directories.
This was a dead end experiment, and not a sensible way of implementing
generic data parallelism. This also removes the `graph500-bfs.rs`
benchmark because it relies on `extra::par`.
Closes#5626
Resolves third bullet of #4691: if the functional-struct-update (FSU) expression `{ a: b, ..s }` causes `s` to move and `s` has a destructor, then the expression is illegal.
r? @nikomatsakis
Many people will be very confused that their debug! statements aren't working
when they first use rust only to learn that they should have been building with
`--cfg debug` the entire time. This inverts the meaning of the flag to instead
of enabling debug statements, now it disables debug statements.
This way the default behavior is a bit more reasonable, and requires less
end-user configuration. Furthermore, this turns on debug by default when
building the rustc compiler.
Many people will be very confused that their debug! statements aren't working
when they first use rust only to learn that they should have been building with
`--cfg debug` the entire time. This inverts the meaning of the flag to instead
of enabling debug statements, now it disables debug statements.
This way the default behavior is a bit more reasonable, and requires less
end-user configuration. Furthermore, this turns on debug by default when
building the rustc compiler.
This is for consistency in naming conventions.
- ``std::num::Float::NaN()`` is changed to ``nan()``;
- ``std::num::Float.is_NaN()`` is changed to ``is_nan()``; and
- ``std::num::strconv::NumStrConv::NaN()`` is changed to ``nan()``.
Fixes#9319.
This is the second of two parts of #8991, now possible as a new snapshot
has been made. (The first part implemented the unreachable!() macro; it
was #8992, 6b7b8f2682.)
``std::util::unreachable()`` is removed summarily; any code which used
it should now use the ``unreachable!()`` macro.
Closes#9312.
Closes#8991.
Previously, the lexer calling `rdr.fatal(...)` would report the span of
the last complete token, instead of a span within the erroneous token
(besides one span fixed in 1ac90bb).
This branch adds wrappers around `rdr.fatal(...)` that sets the span
explicilty, so that all fatal errors in `libsyntax/parse/lexer.rs` now
report the offending code more precisely. A number of tests try to
verify that, though the `compile-fail` testing setup can only check that
the spans are on the right lines, and the "unterminated string/block
comment" errors can't have the line marked at all, so that's incomplete.
This closes#9149.
Also, the lexer errors now report the offending code in the error message,
not just via the span, just like other errors do.
The `Drop` implementation was used to prevent `Future` from being implicitly copyable. Since `~fn`s are no longer copyable, this is no longer needed. I added a cfail test to make sure that this is actually the case.
I method-ized all of the `Future` creation methods and added a new one, `spawn_with`, which is similar to `task::spawn_with`.
I also got rid of some unused imports in tests.
