This adds a new rustc target-configuration called 'x86_64-unknown_uefi'.
Furthermore, it adds a UEFI base-configuration to be used with other
targets supported by UEFI (e.g., i386, armv7hl, aarch64, itanium, ...).
UEFI systems provide a very basic operating-system environment, meant
to unify how systems are booted. It is tailored for simplicity and fast
setup, as it is only meant to bootstrap other systems. For instance, it
copies most of the ABI from Microsoft Windows, rather than inventing
anything on its own. Furthermore, any complex CPU features are
disabled. Only one CPU is allowed to be up, no interrupts other than
the timer-interrupt are allowed, no process-separation is performed,
page-tables are identity-mapped, ...
Nevertheless, UEFI has an application model. Its main purpose is to
allow operating-system vendors to write small UEFI applications that
load their kernel and terminate the UEFI system. However, many other
UEFI applications have emerged in the past, including network-boot,
debug-consoles, and more.
This UEFI target allows to compile rust code natively as UEFI
applications. No standard library support is added, but libcore can be
used out-of-the-box if a panic-handler is provided. Furthermore,
liballoc works as well, if a `GlobalAlloc` handler is provided. Both
have been tested with this target-configuration.
Note that full libstd support is unlikely to happen. While UEFI does
have standardized interfaces for networking and alike, none of these
are mandatory and they are unlikely to be shipped in common consumer
firmwares. Furthermore, several features like process-separation are
not available (or only in very limited fashion). Those parts of libstd
would have to be masked.
This commit moves the linker-flavor flag from a debugging option to a
codegen option, thus stabilizing it. There are no feature flags
associated with this flag.
VecDeque: fix for stacked borrows
`VecDeque` violates a version of stacked borrows where creating a shared reference is not enough to make a location *mutably accessible* from raw pointers (and I think that is the version we want). There are two problems:
* Creating a `NonNull<T>` from `&mut T` goes through `&T` (inferred for a `_`), then `*const T`, then `NonNull<T>`. That means in this stricter version of Stacked Borrows, we cannot actually write to such a `NonNull` because it was created from a shared reference! This PR fixes that by going from `&mut T` to `*mut T` to `*const T`.
* `VecDeque::drain` creates the `Drain` struct by *first* creating a `NonNull` from `self` (which is an `&mut VecDeque`), and *then* calling `self.buffer_as_mut_slice()`. The latter reborrows `self`, asserting that `self` is currently the unique pointer to access this `VecDeque`, and hence invalidating the `NonNull` that was created earlier. This PR fixes that by instead using `self.buffer_as_slice()`, which only performs read accesses and creates only shared references, meaning the raw pointer (`NonNull`) remains valid.
It is possible that other methods on `VecDeque` do something similar, miri's test coverage of `VecDeque` is sparse to say the least.
Cc @nikomatsakis @Gankro
Overhaul `FileSearch` and `SearchPaths`
`FileSearch::search()` traverses one or more directories. For each
directory it generates a `Vec<PathBuf>` containing one element per file
in that directory.
In some benchmarks this occurs enough that the allocations done for the
`PathBuf`s are significant, and in practice a small number of
directories are being traversed over and over again. For example, when
compiling the `tokio-webpush-simple` benchmark, two directories are
traversed 58 times each. Each of these directories have more than 100
files.
We can do all the necessary traversals up front, when `Session` is created,
and get the `Vec<PathBuf>`s then.
This reduces instruction counts on several benchmarks by 1--5%.
r? @alexcrichton
CC @eddyb, @michaelwoerister, @nikomatsakis
rustc: Switch `extern` functions to abort by default on panic
This was intended to land way back in 1.24, but it was backed out due to
breakage which has long since been fixed. An unstable `#[unwind]`
attribute can be used to tweak the behavior here, but this is currently
simply switching rustc's internal default to abort-by-default if an
`extern` function panics, making our codegen sound primarily (as
currently you can produce UB with safe code)
Closes#52652
gdb versions before 8.1 have a bug that prevents the BTreeSet and
BTreeMap pretty-printers from working. This patch disables the test
on those versions, and also disables the pretty-printers there as
well.
Closes#56730
* Update bootstrap compiler
* Update version to 1.33.0
* Remove some `#[cfg(stage0)]` annotations
Actually updating the version number is blocked on updating Cargo
This was intended to land way back in 1.24, but it was backed out due to
breakage which has long since been fixed. An unstable `#[unwind]`
attribute can be used to tweak the behavior here, but this is currently
simply switching rustc's internal default to abort-by-default if an
`extern` function panics, making our codegen sound primarily (as
currently you can produce UB with safe code)
Closes#52652
Fix gpg signing in manifest builder
GPG versions 2.x+ require that --batch be passed if --passphrase-fd is
to be accepted.
From the man page:
--passphrase-fd n
Read the passphrase from file descriptor n. Only the first line
will be read from file descriptor n. If you use 0 for n, the
passphrase will be read from STDIN. This can only be used if
only one passphrase is supplied.
Note that this passphrase is only used if the option --batch has
also been given. This is different from GnuPG version 1.x.
std: Depend directly on crates.io crates
Ever since we added a Cargo-based build system for the compiler the
standard library has always been a little special, it's never been able
to depend on crates.io crates for runtime dependencies. This has been a
result of various limitations, namely that Cargo doesn't understand that
crates from crates.io depend on libcore, so Cargo tries to build crates
before libcore is finished.
I had an idea this afternoon, however, which lifts the strategy
from #52919 to directly depend on crates.io crates from the standard
library. After all is said and done this removes a whopping three
submodules that we need to manage!
The basic idea here is that for any crate `std` depends on it adds an
*optional* dependency on an empty crate on crates.io, in this case named
`rustc-std-workspace-core`. This crate is overridden via `[patch]` in
this repository to point to a local crate we write, and *that* has a
`path` dependency on libcore.
Note that all `no_std` crates also depend on `compiler_builtins`, but if
we're not using submodules we can publish `compiler_builtins` to
crates.io and all crates can depend on it anyway! The basic strategy
then looks like:
* The standard library (or some transitive dep) decides to depend on a
crate `foo`.
* The standard library adds
```toml
[dependencies]
foo = { version = "0.1", features = ['rustc-dep-of-std'] }
```
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `rustc-std-workspace-core`
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `compiler_builtins`
* The crate `foo` has a feature `rustc-dep-of-std` which activates these
crates and any other necessary infrastructure in the crate.
A sample commit for `dlmalloc` [turns out to be quite simple][commit].
After that all `no_std` crates should largely build "as is" and still be
publishable on crates.io! Notably they should be able to continue to use
stable Rust if necessary, since the `rename-dependency` feature of Cargo
is soon stabilizing.
As a proof of concept, this commit removes the `dlmalloc`,
`libcompiler_builtins`, and `libc` submodules from this repository. Long
thorns in our side these are now gone for good and we can directly
depend on crates.io! It's hoped that in the long term we can bring in
other crates as necessary, but for now this is largely intended to
simply make it easier to manage these crates and remove submodules.
This should be a transparent non-breaking change for all users, but one
possible stickler is that this almost for sure breaks out-of-tree
`std`-building tools like `xargo` and `cargo-xbuild`. I think it should
be relatively easy to get them working, however, as all that's needed is
an entry in the `[patch]` section used to build the standard library.
Hopefully we can work with these tools to solve this problem!
[commit]: 28ee12db81
SortedMap upgrades
- change the impl `From<Iterator<I>>` to `FromIterator<I>`
- make the impls of `Index` and `get` match the ones from `BTreeMap`
- add `is_empty` and `contains_key`
- readability/whitespace fixes
- add a proper `Iterator` implementation
- `impl IntoIterator for &SortedMap`
These changes make `SortedMap` almost a drop-in replacement for `BTreeMap`, at least to the point it is used by `rustc`; what is left is `Entry` API that I'd like to follow this PR with, and possibly implementing `ParallelIterator`.
fix intra-link resolution spans in block comments
This commit improves the calculation of code spans for intra-doc
resolution failures. All sugared doc comments should now have the
correct spans, including those where the comment is longer than the
docs.
It also fixes an issue where the spans were calculated incorrectly for
certain unsugared doc comments. The diagnostic will now always use the
span of the attributes, as originally intended.
Fixes#55964.
r? @QuietMisdreavus
Ever since we added a Cargo-based build system for the compiler the
standard library has always been a little special, it's never been able
to depend on crates.io crates for runtime dependencies. This has been a
result of various limitations, namely that Cargo doesn't understand that
crates from crates.io depend on libcore, so Cargo tries to build crates
before libcore is finished.
I had an idea this afternoon, however, which lifts the strategy
from #52919 to directly depend on crates.io crates from the standard
library. After all is said and done this removes a whopping three
submodules that we need to manage!
The basic idea here is that for any crate `std` depends on it adds an
*optional* dependency on an empty crate on crates.io, in this case named
`rustc-std-workspace-core`. This crate is overridden via `[patch]` in
this repository to point to a local crate we write, and *that* has a
`path` dependency on libcore.
Note that all `no_std` crates also depend on `compiler_builtins`, but if
we're not using submodules we can publish `compiler_builtins` to
crates.io and all crates can depend on it anyway! The basic strategy
then looks like:
* The standard library (or some transitive dep) decides to depend on a
crate `foo`.
* The standard library adds
```toml
[dependencies]
foo = { version = "0.1", features = ['rustc-dep-of-std'] }
```
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `rustc-std-workspace-core`
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `compiler_builtins`
* The crate `foo` has a feature `rustc-dep-of-std` which activates these
crates and any other necessary infrastructure in the crate.
A sample commit for `dlmalloc` [turns out to be quite simple][commit].
After that all `no_std` crates should largely build "as is" and still be
publishable on crates.io! Notably they should be able to continue to use
stable Rust if necessary, since the `rename-dependency` feature of Cargo
is soon stabilizing.
As a proof of concept, this commit removes the `dlmalloc`,
`libcompiler_builtins`, and `libc` submodules from this repository. Long
thorns in our side these are now gone for good and we can directly
depend on crates.io! It's hoped that in the long term we can bring in
other crates as necessary, but for now this is largely intended to
simply make it easier to manage these crates and remove submodules.
This should be a transparent non-breaking change for all users, but one
possible stickler is that this almost for sure breaks out-of-tree
`std`-building tools like `xargo` and `cargo-xbuild`. I think it should
be relatively easy to get them working, however, as all that's needed is
an entry in the `[patch]` section used to build the standard library.
Hopefully we can work with these tools to solve this problem!
[commit]: 28ee12db81
`FileSearch::search()` traverses one or more directories. For each
directory it generates a `Vec<PathBuf>` containing one element per file
in that directory.
In some benchmarks this occurs enough that the allocations done for the
`PathBuf`s are significant, and in practice a small number of
directories are being traversed over and over again. For example, when
compiling the `tokio-webpush-simple` benchmark, two directories are
traversed 58 times each. Each of these directories have more than 100
files.
This commit changes things so that all the `Vec<PathBuf>`s that will be
needed by a `Session` are precomputed when that `Session` is created;
they are stored in `SearchPath`. `FileSearch` gets a reference to the
necessary `SearchPath`s. This reduces instruction counts on several
benchmarks by 1--5%.
The commit also removes the barely-used `visited_dirs` hash in
`for_each_lib_searchPath`. It only detects if `tlib_path` is the same as
one of the previously seen paths, which is unlikely.
Instead of maybe storing its own sysroot and maybe deferring to the one
in `Session::opts`, just clone the latter when necessary so one is
always directly available. This removes the need for the getter.
This shrinks `Option<Symbol>` from 8 bytes to 4 bytes, which shrinks
`Token` from 24 bytes to 16 bytes. This reduces instruction counts by up
to 1% across a range of benchmarks.
