let htmldocck.py check for directories
Since i messed this up during https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44613, i wanted to codify this into the rustdoc tests to make sure that doesn't happen again.
MIR borrowck: move span_label to `borrowck_errors.rs`
The calls to `span_label` are moved and factorized for:
* E0503 (`cannot_use_when_mutably_borrowed()`)
* E0506 (`cannot_assign_to_borrowed()`)
Additionnally, the error E0594 (`cannot_assign_static()`) has been factorized between `check_loan.rs` and `borrowc_check.rs`.
Part of #44596
This can be used to build rust-std.
The dilos illumos distribution was chosen, because illumos is free software
as opposed to Oracle Solaris and dilos is the only illumos distribution that
supports x86_64 and sparcv9 at the same level.
Move monomorphize::resolve() to librustc
this moves `monomorphize::resolve(..)` to librustc, and re-enables inlining for some trait methods, fixing #44389
@nikomatsakis I've kept the calls to the new `ty::Instance::resolve(....)` always `.unwrap()`-ing for the moment, how/do you want to add more debugging info via `.unwrap_or()` or something like this?
we still have some related `resolve_*` functions on monomorphize, but I wasn't sure moving them was into the scope for this PR too.
@eddyb mind to take a look too?
There's always a basis for the overlap, so instead of removing the
assert entirely, I instead pass in the prefix that we found and check
that it actually is a prefix of both lvalues.
Fix#44829
some dataflow-tracked borrow-data entry.
Fix#44828
(The comment thread on the aforementioned issue discusses why its best
to just remove this assertion.)
The ARMv5te platform does not have instruction-level support for atomics, however the kernel provides [user space helpers](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/arm/kernel_user_helpers.txt) which can be used to perform atomic operations. When linked with `libc`, the atomic symbols needed by Rust will be provided, rather than CPU level intrinsics.
As this target is specifically `linux` and `gnueabi`, it is reasonable to assume the Linux Kernel and libc will be available for the target. There is a large performance penalty, as we are not using CPU level intrinsics, however this penalty is likely preferable to not having the target at all.
I have used this change in a custom target (along with `xargo`) to build `std`, as well as a number of higher level crates.
Mir pretty print: Add cleanup comment
I found it useful to add a comment indicating whether or not a
BasicBlock is a cleanup block or not. Hopefully you'll find it
useful too.
