The methods used to implement operators now simply use
the name of the operator itself, except for unary -, which is called
min to not clash with binary -. Index is called [].
Closes#1520
When no built-in interpretation is found for one of the operators
mentioned below, the typechecker will try to turn it into a method
call with the name written next to it. For binary operators, the
method will be called on the LHS with the RHS as only parameter.
Binary:
+ op_add
- op_sub
* op_mul
/ op_div
% op_rem
& op_and
| op_or
^ op_xor
<< op_shift_left
>> op_shift_right
>>> op_ashift_right
Unary:
- op_neg
! op_not
Overloading of the indexing ([]) operator isn't finished yet.
Issue #1520
Although its not really needed. Without that fix, reported spans will
likely be bogus if the error is within the first couple of lines
(probable around 5) of that file. Thus, many of the compile-fail
tests will fail due to incorrect location.
Check that in export foo{}, foo is an enum type, and that in export
foo{bar, quux}, foo is an enum type and bar and quux are variants belonging
to foo.
See issue 1426 for details. Now, the semantics of "export t;" where t is a tag are
to export all of t's variants as well. "export t{};" exports t but not its
variants, while "export t{a, b, c};" exports only variants a, b, c of t.
To do:
- documentation
- there's currently no checking that a, b, c are actually variants of t in the
above example
- there's also no checking that t is an enum type, in the second two examples above
- change the modules listed in issue 1426 that should have the old export
semantics to use the t{} syntax
I deleted the test export-no-tag-variants since we're doing the opposite now,
and other tests cover the same behavior.
Support Lenny222's proposed syntax for exporting a tag without
its variants, or selected tags from a variant, in the AST and parser.
No support further down the line yet. Tests are xfailed.
Previously, typestate would conclude that this function was
correctly diverging:
fn f() -> ! { ret; fail; }
even though it always returns to the caller. It wasn't handling the
i_diverge and i_return bits correctly in the fail case. Fixed it.
Closes#897
typestate was using the enclosing function ID for the "this function
returns" constraint, which meant confusion and panic in the case
where a predicate p includes "check p()". Fixed it to use a fresh
ID.
Closes#933
The code in Issue 948 was causing typestate to diverge because
it was using the prestate for the whole expression -- not the post-
state for the fields list -- as the prestate for the record base
expression. Fixed.
Closes#948
This is not my ideal way of going about things. I'd prefer not
to have expressions typed as fn*(), for example, but I couldn't
get that to work together with inferring the modes of arguments
and other corner cases.
Although the old version of GEP_tup_like was incorrect in some
cases, I do not believe we ever used it in an incorrect fashion.
In particular, it could go wrong with extended index sequences
like [0, 1, 3], but as near as I can tell we only ever use it
with short sequences like [0, i].
