Fix bootstrap.py uname error
The x.py script fails with `ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 3)` when uname -smp gives more than 3 words
The error I got:
```
❯ ./x check
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/data1/edgar/rust/x.py", line 50, in <module>
bootstrap.main()
File "/data1/edgar/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 1113, in main
bootstrap(args)
File "/data1/edgar/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 1070, in bootstrap
build = RustBuild(config_toml, args)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/data1/edgar/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 505, in __init__
self.build = args.build or self.build_triple()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/data1/edgar/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 976, in build_triple
return config or default_build_triple(self.verbose)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/data1/edgar/rust/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 259, in default_build_triple
kernel, cputype, processor = uname.decode(default_encoding).split()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 3)
```
This is because
```
❯ uname -smp
Linux x86_64 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor
```
Returns more than 3 space separated words.
Allow to have `-` in rustdoc-json test file name
I extracted this commit from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113574.
When I added the test, it kept saying that the JSON file couldn't be found. After investigating for a while, I discovered that we were expecting files to always use `_`, which is quite bad. So I added support for `-` in file names.
r? ``@notriddle``
Test simd-wide-sum for codegen error
This adds the necessary test infrastructure to "build-pass" codegen tests, for the purpose of doing that for a single revision of a codegen test. When mir-opts are tested, the output may vary from the usual, and maybe for positive reasons... but we don't necessarily want to output such bad LLVMIR that LLVM starts crashing on it.
Currently when enabling MIR opts at higher levels this LLVMIR is still emitted, but it was previously disabled for getting in mir-opt's way and as this new revision without `// [mir-opt3]build-pass` would make it more likely to, I would like to not see the testing for the actual results regress again just because it was bundled with an ICE check as well.
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98016
Update cargo
10 commits in 45782b6b8afd1da042d45c2daeec9c0744f72cc7..694a579566a9a1482b20aff8a68f0e4edd99bd28
2023-07-05 16:54:51 +0000 to 2023-07-11 22:28:29 +0000
- fix(embedded): Always generate valid package names (rust-lang/cargo#12349)
- fix(embedded): Error on unsupported commands (rust-lang/cargo#12350)
- chore(ci): Automatically test new packages by using `--workspace` (rust-lang/cargo#12342)
- contrib docs: Add some more detail about how publishing works (rust-lang/cargo#12344)
- docs: Put cargo-add change under nightly (rust-lang/cargo#12343)
- Minor: Use "number" instead of "digit" when explaining Cargo's use of semver (rust-lang/cargo#12340)
- Update criterion (rust-lang/cargo#12338)
- Add profile strip to config docs. (rust-lang/cargo#12337)
- update re: multiple versions that differ only in the metadata tag (rust-lang/cargo#12335)
- doc: state `PackageId`/`SourceId` string is opaque (rust-lang/cargo#12313)
r? ``@ghost``
Make Placeholder, GeneratorWitness*, Infer and Error unreachable on SMIR rustc_ty_to_ty
Let's remove these todos to not confuse ``@ericmarkmartin`` if they pick some conversion up.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Implement selection for `Unsize` for better coercion behavior
In order for much of coercion to succeed, we need to be able to deal with partial ambiguity of `Unsize` traits during selection. However, I pessimistically implemented selection in the new trait solver to just bail out with ambiguity if it was a built-in impl:
9227ff28af/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/select.rs (L126)
This implements a proper "rematch" procedure for dealing with built-in `Unsize` goals, so that even if the goal is ambiguous, we are able to get nested obligations which are used in the coercion selection-like loop:
9227ff28af/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/coercion.rs (L702)
Second commit just moves a `resolve_vars_if_possible` call to fix a bug where we weren't detecting a trait upcasting to occur.
r? ``@lcnr``
If someone says `x test rustdoc-js-std` explicitly on the command line, it's because they want to
run the tests. Give an error instead of doing nothing and reporting success.
...which seems not to be available on some platforms.
Or maybe it is under a different name but I don't want to deal with that
Instead, use two u64s. This isn't exactly the same, but we already have
some coverage of the packed u128 case in another test, so it's not
essential to have it here.
Coverage has two FFI functions for computing the hash of a byte string. One
takes a ptr/len pair, and the other takes a NUL-terminated C string.
But on closer inspection, the C string version is unnecessary. The calling-side
code converts a Rust `&str` into a C string, and the C++ code then immediately
turns it back into a ptr/len string before actually hashing it.
The function body immediately treats it as a slice anyway, so this just makes
it possible to call the hash function with arbitrary read-only byte slices.
Ignore flaky clippy tests.
These tests are frequently failing due to an issue in ui_test. ui_test doesn't appear to have a blanket ignore instruction that I could find, so I just approximated it with ignoring both 32 and 64 bit.
Fixes#113585
