currently trans_c_stack_native_call() had some ad-hoc code for
determining the type of the arguments. this code was not in
agreement with the rest of trans. now it uses the same code path.
Previously, the parser would try to interpret this as a block call:
if true {} // No semicolon
{|i, am, a, block|};
Which, though unlikely, might come up in practice.
This makes it possible to omit the semicolon after the block, and will
cause the pretty-printer to properly print such calls (if
pretty-printing of blocks wasn't so broken). Block calls (with the
block outside of the parentheses) can now only occur at statement
level, and their value can not be used. When calling a block-style
function that returns a useful value, the block must be put insde the
parentheses.
Issue #1054
Trans has been assuming that tag node id's are unique across crates and they
are not so, depending on which way the wind is blowing, it would choose to use
a crate-local tag variant instead of the correct one from std.
No test case since I can't come up with a reliable one that compiles in a
reasonable amount of time.
This allows unify to maintain the same subtype relationship between
expected and actual throughout unify, which we are going to need
for mutable? and for function types.
Building Rust(version 280bc56) on Ubuntu 11.10 failed with link error,
like:
compile_and_link: stage0/lib/rustc/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd.so
compile_and_link: stage0/lib/rustc/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/rustc
/local/src/rust/build/stage0/lib/rustc/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/librustrt.so:
undefined reference to `clock_gettime'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
error: linking with gcc failed with code 1
GCC toolchain released by Ubuntu 11.10 introduced a few compiler flags
that are different with upstream GCC[1]. Flags "-Wl,--as-needed' and
'-Wl,--no-copy-dt-needed-entries' are passed by default.
Function clock_gettime from librt is used by librustrt, indirectly by
rustc. It is necessary to explicitly pass the "-lrt" flags when building
rustc.
Please note since the toolchain changes will be the default in the next
release(2.22) of binutils, this is not actually a Debian/Ubuntu specific
issue.
1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OneiricOcelot/ReleaseNotes#GCC_4.6_Toolchain
Signed-off-by: Haitao Li <lihaitao@gmail.com>