mk: Add configure option for disabling codegen tests
Our `codegen` test suite requires the LLVM `FileCheck` utility but unfortunately
this isn't always available in all custom LLVM roots (e.g. those specified via
`--llvm-root`). This commit adds a `./configure` option called
`--disable-codegen-tests` which will manually disable running these tests. In
the case that this option is passed we can forgo the need for the `FileCheck`
executable. Note that we still require `FileCheck` by default as we will attempt
to run these tests.
Closes#28667
Our `codegen` test suite requires the LLVM `FileCheck` utility but unfortunately
this isn't always available in all custom LLVM roots (e.g. those specified via
`--llvm-root`). This commit adds a `./configure` option called
`--disable-codegen-tests` which will manually disable running these tests. In
the case that this option is passed we can forgo the need for the `FileCheck`
executable. Note that we still require `FileCheck` by default as we will attempt
to run these tests.
Closes#28667
Stop accepting declarations when looking for definitions
eternally_available linkage isn't legal for declarations anyway, so the
check for an externally_available declaration should never succeed, so
let's remove it.
rustbuild: Fix compile on OSX for 10.7
This commit should help configure our OSX rustbuild builder for targeting 10.7.
A key part of this is using `libc++` instead of `libstdc++` as apparently it's
more filled out and otherwise LLVM's cmake configuration would fail.
librustc: Add bug!(), bug_span!() macros as unified entry points for internal compiler errors
The macros pass `file!()`, `line!()` and `format_args!(...)` on to a cold, never-inlined function, ultimately calling `session::{span_,}bug_fmt` via the tcx in tls or, failing that, panicking directly.
cc @eddyb
r? @nikomatsakis
Like the comment on `Context` explains, `Context` is supposed to be
lightweight, so we're putting everything that's immutable after
creation of the Context behind an `Arc<SharedContext>`.
Instead of hardcoding knowledge about the strip-private pass into the
rendering process we represent (some) stripped items as `ItemEnum::StrippedItem`.
Rustdoc will, for example, generate redirect pages for public items
contained in private modules which have been re-exported to somewhere
externally reachable - this will now not only work for the `strip-private`
pass, but for other passes as well, such as the `strip-hidden` pass.
allow RUST_BACKTRACE=0 to act as if unset
**UPDATE:** `RUST_BACKTRACE=0` to act as if the env. var is unset! (now `0` is what `disabled` was for, below)
When RUST_BACKTRACE is set to "disabled" then this acts as if the env. var is unset. So, either make sure `RUST_BACKTRACE` is not set OR set it to `disabled` to achieve the same effect.
Sample usage:
```bash
$ rustc -o /tmp/a.out -- <(echo 'fn main(){ panic!() }') && RUST_BACKTRACE=disabled /tmp/a.out
!! executing '/home/zazdxscf/build/1nonpkgs/rust/rust//x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin//rustc' with args: '-o /tmp/a.out -- /dev/fd/63'
thread '<main>' panicked at 'explicit panic', /dev/fd/63:1
note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.
$ rustc -o /tmp/a.out -- <(echo 'fn main(){ panic!() }') && RUST_BACKTRACE=1 /tmp/a.out
!! executing '/home/zazdxscf/build/1nonpkgs/rust/rust//x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin//rustc' with args: '-o /tmp/a.out -- /dev/fd/63'
thread '<main>' panicked at 'explicit panic', /dev/fd/63:1
stack backtrace:
1: 0x55709e8148c0 - sys::backtrace::tracing:👿:write::h140f24a0cfc189b98Ru
2: 0x55709e816a5b - panicking::default_hook::_$u7b$$u7b$closure$u7d$$u7d$::closure.45165
3: 0x55709e8166e8 - panicking::default_hook::hed419823688cb82aXoA
4: 0x55709e810fff - sys_common::unwind::begin_unwind_inner::hbb9642f6e212d56fmHt
5: 0x55709e810513 - sys_common::unwind::begin_unwind::h16232867470678019594
6: 0x55709e810489 - main::hb524f9576270962feaa
7: 0x55709e816314 - sys_common::unwind::try::try_fn::h1274188004693518534
8: 0x55709e813dfb - __rust_try
9: 0x55709e815dab - rt::lang_start::h712b1cd650781872ahA
10: 0x55709e810679 - main
11: 0x7efd1026859f - __libc_start_main
12: 0x55709e810348 - _start
13: 0x0 - <unknown>
```
Some programs(eg. [vim's syntactic](https://github.com/scrooloose/syntastic) used by [rust.vim](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.vim)) cannot unset the env. var RUST_BACKTRACE if it's already set(eg. in .bashrc) but [they can set it to some value](cb5533e159/system/Z575/OSes/gentoo/on_baremetal/filesystem_now/gentoo/home/zazdxscf/build/1nonpkgs/rust.vim/upd (L17)), and I needed to ensure the env. var is unset in order to avoid this issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29293
**EDIT:** Sample usage 2:
```bash
$ export RUST_BACKTRACE=1
$ rustc -o /tmp/a.out -- <(echo 'fn main(){ panic!() }') && /tmp/a.out
!! executing '/home/zazdxscf/build/1nonpkgs/rust/rust//x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin//rustc' with args: '-o /tmp/a.out -- /dev/fd/63'
thread '<main>' panicked at 'explicit panic', /dev/fd/63:1
stack backtrace:
1: 0x55c2696738c0 - sys::backtrace::tracing:👿:write::h140f24a0cfc189b98Ru
2: 0x55c269675a5b - panicking::default_hook::_$u7b$$u7b$closure$u7d$$u7d$::closure.45165
3: 0x55c2696756e8 - panicking::default_hook::hed419823688cb82aXoA
4: 0x55c26966ffff - sys_common::unwind::begin_unwind_inner::hbb9642f6e212d56fmHt
5: 0x55c26966f513 - sys_common::unwind::begin_unwind::h16023941661074805588
6: 0x55c26966f489 - main::hb524f9576270962feaa
7: 0x55c269675314 - sys_common::unwind::try::try_fn::h1274188004693518534
8: 0x55c269672dfb - __rust_try
9: 0x55c269674dab - rt::lang_start::h712b1cd650781872ahA
10: 0x55c26966f679 - main
11: 0x7f593d58459f - __libc_start_main
12: 0x55c26966f348 - _start
13: 0x0 - <unknown>
$ rustc -o /tmp/a.out -- <(echo 'fn main(){ panic!() }') && RUST_BACKTRACE=disabled /tmp/a.out
!! executing '/home/zazdxscf/build/1nonpkgs/rust/rust//x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin//rustc' with args: '-o /tmp/a.out -- /dev/fd/63'
thread '<main>' panicked at 'explicit panic', /dev/fd/63:1
note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.
```
Added missing refcell ref/refmut coercions to unsized
Ref/RefMut should be coercible to unsized.
This commit adds a unit test and two missing CoerceUnsized implementations.
rustbuild: Fix dist for non-host targets
The `rust-std` package that we produce is expected to have not only the standard
library but also libtest for compiling unit tests. Unfortunately this does not
currently happen due to the way rustbuild is structured.
There are currently two main stages of compilation in rustbuild, one for the
standard library and one for the compiler. This is primarily done to allow us to
fill in the sysroot right after the standard library has finished compiling to
continue compiling the rest of the crates. Consequently the entire compiler does
not have to explicitly depend on the standard library, and this also should
allow us to pull in crates.io dependencies into the build in the future because
they'll just naturally build against the std we just produced.
These phases, however, do not represent a cross-compiled build. Target-only
builds also require libtest, and libtest is currently part of the
all-encompassing "compiler build". There's unfortunately no way to learn about
just libtest and its dependencies (in a great and robust fashion) so to ensure
that we can copy the right artifacts over this commit introduces a new build
step, libtest.
The new libtest build step has documentation, dist, and link steps as std/rustc
already do. The compiler now depends on libtest instead of libstd, and all
compiler crates can now assume that test and its dependencies are implicitly
part of the sysroot (hence explicit dependencies being removed). This makes the
build a tad less parallel as in theory many rustc crates can be compiled in
parallel with libtest, but this likely isn't where we really need parallelism
either (all the time is still spent in the compiler).
All in all this allows the `dist-std` step to depend on both libstd and libtest,
so `rust-std` packages produced by rustbuild should start having both the
standard library and libtest.
Closes#32523
The `rust-std` package that we produce is expected to have not only the standard
library but also libtest for compiling unit tests. Unfortunately this does not
currently happen due to the way rustbuild is structured.
There are currently two main stages of compilation in rustbuild, one for the
standard library and one for the compiler. This is primarily done to allow us to
fill in the sysroot right after the standard library has finished compiling to
continue compiling the rest of the crates. Consequently the entire compiler does
not have to explicitly depend on the standard library, and this also should
allow us to pull in crates.io dependencies into the build in the future because
they'll just naturally build against the std we just produced.
These phases, however, do not represent a cross-compiled build. Target-only
builds also require libtest, and libtest is currently part of the
all-encompassing "compiler build". There's unfortunately no way to learn about
just libtest and its dependencies (in a great and robust fashion) so to ensure
that we can copy the right artifacts over this commit introduces a new build
step, libtest.
The new libtest build step has documentation, dist, and link steps as std/rustc
already do. The compiler now depends on libtest instead of libstd, and all
compiler crates can now assume that test and its dependencies are implicitly
part of the sysroot (hence explicit dependencies being removed). This makes the
build a tad less parallel as in theory many rustc crates can be compiled in
parallel with libtest, but this likely isn't where we really need parallelism
either (all the time is still spent in the compiler).
All in all this allows the `dist-std` step to depend on both libstd and libtest,
so `rust-std` packages produced by rustbuild should start having both the
standard library and libtest.
Closes#32523
eternally_available linkage isn't legal for declarations anyway, so the
check for an externally_available declaration should never succeed, so
let's remove it.
Book: in beginner guide change irc channel #rust → #rust-beginners
I also would like to add the reference on the first README.md
Some like
```
most popular channel is [#rust], a venue for general discussion about
-Rust, and a good place to ask for help.
+Rust. And a good place to ask for help would be [#rust-beginners].
[IRC]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Relay_Chat
[#rust]: irc://irc.mozilla.org/rust
+[#rust-beginners]: irc://irc.mozilla.org/rust-beginners
```
So In the first page would be the two options for #rust or #rust-beginners
Change Arc to use compare_exchange instead of compare_and_swap
This should slightly improve code generation on architectures with a weak memory model like ARM.
specialize ToString for str
If there was some conditional compiling we could do, such that this impl only exists in nightly, and is turned off in beta/stable, I think that'd be an improvement here, as we could test specialization out without affecting stable builds.
/# This is a combination of 16 commits.
/# The first commit's message is:
allow RUST_BACKTRACE=disabled to act as if unset
When RUST_BACKTRACE is set to "disabled" then this acts as if the env.
var is unset.
/# This is the 2nd commit message:
case insensitive "DiSaBLeD" RUST_BACKTRACE value
previously it expected a lowercase "disabled" to treat the env. var as
unset
/# This is the 3rd commit message:
RUST_BACKTRACE=0 acts as if unset
previously RUST_BACKTRACE=disabled was doing the same thing
/# This is the 4th commit message:
RUST_BACKTRACE=0|n|no|off acts as if unset
previously only RUST_BACKTRACE=0 acted as if RUST_BACKTRACE was unset
Now added more options (case-insensitive): 'n','no' and 'off'
eg. RUST_BACKTRACE=oFF
/# This is the 5th commit message:
DRY on the value of 2
DRY=don't repeat yourself
Because having to remember to keep the two places of '2' in sync is not
ideal, even though this is a simple enough case.
/# This is the 6th commit message:
Revert "DRY on the value of 2"
This reverts commit 95a0479d5cf72a2b2d9d21ec0bed2823ed213fef.
Nevermind this DRY on 2, because we already have a RY on 1,
besides the code is less readable this way...
/# This is the 7th commit message:
attempt to document unsetting RUST_BACKTRACE
/# This is the 8th commit message:
curb allocations when checking for RUST_BACKTRACE
this means we don't check for case-insensitivity anymore
/# This is the 9th commit message:
as decided, RUST_BACKTRACE=0 turns off backtrace
/# This is the 10th commit message:
RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE=0 acts as if unset
(that is, capture is on)
Any other value acts as if nocapture is enabled (that is, capture is off)
/# This is the 11th commit message:
update other RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE occurrences
apparently only one place needs updating
/# This is the 12th commit message:
update RUST_BACKTRACE in man page
/# This is the 13th commit message:
handle an occurrence of RUST_BACKTRACE
/# This is the 14th commit message:
ensure consistency with new rules for backtrace
/# This is the 15th commit message:
a more concise comment for RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE
/# This is the 16th commit message:
update RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE in man page
