Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Crichton
ec7c800d2f Remove pretty-expanded from failing tests
This commit removes pretty-expanded from all tests that wind up calling panic!
one way or another now that its internals are unstable.
2015-04-08 17:21:34 -07:00
Brian Anderson
8c93a79e38 rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expanded
Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile.
This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work.
2015-03-23 14:40:26 -07:00
Jorge Aparicio
17bc7d8d5b cleanup: replace as[_mut]_slice() calls with deref coercions 2015-02-05 13:45:01 -05:00
Alex Crichton
9d5d97b55d Remove a large amount of deprecated functionality
Spring cleaning is here! In the Fall! This commit removes quite a large amount
of deprecated functionality from the standard libraries. I tried to ensure that
only old deprecated functionality was removed.

This is removing lots and lots of deprecated features, so this is a breaking
change. Please consult the deprecation messages of the deleted code to see how
to migrate code forward if it still needs migration.

[breaking-change]
2014-10-19 12:59:40 -07:00
Nick Cameron
3e626375d8 DST coercions and DST structs
[breaking-change]

1. The internal layout for traits has changed from (vtable, data) to (data, vtable). If you were relying on this in unsafe transmutes, you might get some very weird and apparently unrelated errors. You should not be doing this! Prefer not to do this at all, but if you must, you should use raw::TraitObject rather than hardcoding rustc's internal representation into your code.

2. The minimal type of reference-to-vec-literals (e.g., `&[1, 2, 3]`) is now a fixed size vec (e.g., `&[int, ..3]`) where it used to be an unsized vec (e.g., `&[int]`). If you want the unszied type, you must explicitly give the type (e.g., `let x: &[_] = &[1, 2, 3]`). Note in particular where multiple blocks must have the same type (e.g., if and else clauses, vec elements), the compiler will not coerce to the unsized type without a hint. E.g., `[&[1], &[1, 2]]` used to be a valid expression of type '[&[int]]'. It no longer type checks since the first element now has type `&[int, ..1]` and the second has type &[int, ..2]` which are incompatible.

3. The type of blocks (including functions) must be coercible to the expected type (used to be a subtype). Mostly this makes things more flexible and not less (in particular, in the case of coercing function bodies to the return type). However, in some rare cases, this is less flexible. TBH, I'm not exactly sure of the exact effects. I think the change causes us to resolve inferred type variables slightly earlier which might make us slightly more restrictive. Possibly it only affects blocks with unreachable code. E.g., `if ... { fail!(); "Hello" }` used to type check, it no longer does. The fix is to add a semicolon after the string.
2014-08-26 12:38:51 +12:00
Richo Healey
1f1b2e42d7 std: Rename strbuf operations to string
[breaking-change]
2014-05-27 12:59:31 -07:00
Richo Healey
553074506e core: rename strbuf::StrBuf to string::String
[breaking-change]
2014-05-24 21:48:10 -07:00
Patrick Walton
95e310abdc test: Remove all uses of ~str from the test suite. 2014-05-14 14:58:00 -07:00
Richo Healey
919889a1d6 Replace all ~"" with "".to_owned() 2014-04-18 17:25:34 -07:00
Alex Crichton
4d5da45e7e Add a test for closed issue #9259
This must have been fixed in some recent trans refactor/rewrite, hurray!

Closes #9259
2014-01-18 11:01:15 -08:00