floating point numbers for real.
This will break code that looks like:
let mut x = 0;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Change that code to:
let mut x = 0i;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Closes#15201.
[breaking-change]
This commit revisits the `cast` module in libcore and libstd, and scrutinizes
all functions inside of it. The result was to remove the `cast` module entirely,
folding all functionality into the `mem` module. Specifically, this is the fate
of each function in the `cast` module.
* transmute - This function was moved to `mem`, but it is now marked as
#[unstable]. This is due to planned changes to the `transmute`
function and how it can be invoked (see the #[unstable] comment).
For more information, see RFC 5 and #12898
* transmute_copy - This function was moved to `mem`, with clarification that is
is not an error to invoke it with T/U that are different
sizes, but rather that it is strongly discouraged. This
function is now #[stable]
* forget - This function was moved to `mem` and marked #[stable]
* bump_box_refcount - This function was removed due to the deprecation of
managed boxes as well as its questionable utility.
* transmute_mut - This function was previously deprecated, and removed as part
of this commit.
* transmute_mut_unsafe - This function doesn't serve much of a purpose when it
can be achieved with an `as` in safe code, so it was
removed.
* transmute_lifetime - This function was removed because it is likely a strong
indication that code is incorrect in the first place.
* transmute_mut_lifetime - This function was removed for the same reasons as
`transmute_lifetime`
* copy_lifetime - This function was moved to `mem`, but it is marked
`#[unstable]` now due to the likelihood of being removed in
the future if it is found to not be very useful.
* copy_mut_lifetime - This function was also moved to `mem`, but had the same
treatment as `copy_lifetime`.
* copy_lifetime_vec - This function was removed because it is not used today,
and its existence is not necessary with DST
(copy_lifetime will suffice).
In summary, the cast module was stripped down to these functions, and then the
functions were moved to the `mem` module.
transmute - #[unstable]
transmute_copy - #[stable]
forget - #[stable]
copy_lifetime - #[unstable]
copy_mut_lifetime - #[unstable]
[breaking-change]
This commit shreds all remnants of libextra from the compiler and standard
distribution. Two modules, c_vec/tempfile, were moved into libstd after some
cleanup, and the other modules were moved to separate crates as seen fit.
Closes#8784Closes#12413Closes#12576
So *resource, ~resource, [resource] are all pinned. This is counter to the
design of the kind system, but this way is a much clearer path to type safety.
Once we've established a good baseline with lots of tests, then we can try to
make raising pinned kinds work.
typeck::check_fn had an exception for the case where the tail expr
was compatible with type nil -- in that case, it doesn't unify the
tail expr's type with the enclosing function's result type. This
seems wrong to me. There are several test cases in Issue #719
that illustrate why. If the tail expr has type T, for some type
variable T that isn't resolved when this check happens, then T
never gets unified with anything, which is incorrect -- T should
be unified with the result type of the enclosing function. (The
bug was occurring because an unconstrained type variable is
compatible with type nil.)
Instead, I removed the check for type nil and added a check that
the function isn't an iterator -- if it's an iterator, I don't
check the tail expr's type against the function result type,
as that wouldn't make sense.
However, this broke two test cases, and after discussion with
brson, I understood that the purpose of the check was to allow
semicolons to be omitted in some cases. The whole thing seems
rather ad hoc. But I came up with a hacky compromise solution:
instead of checking whether the tailexpr type is *compatible*
with nil, we now just check whether it *is* nil. This also
necessitates calling resolve_type_vars_if_possible before
the check happens, which worries me. But, this fixes the bug
from Issue #719 without requiring changes to any test cases.
Closes#719 but I didn't try every variation -- so reopen the bug
if one of the variations still doesn't work.
