The text claimed 'any borrow must last for a _smaller_ scope than the
owner', however the accurate way of describing the comparison is
inclusive (i.e., 'less than or equal to' vs. 'less than').
* Add “complex” mappings to `char::to_lowercase` and `char::to_uppercase`, making them yield sometimes more than on `char`: #25800. `str::to_lowercase` and `str::to_uppercase` are affected as well.
* Add `char::to_titlecase`, since it’s the same algorithm (just different data). However this does **not** add `str::to_titlecase`, as that would require UAX#29 Unicode Text Segmentation which we decided not to include in of `std`: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1054 I made `char::to_titlecase` immediately `#[stable]`, since it’s so similar to `char::to_uppercase` that’s already stable. Let me know if it should be `#[unstable]` for a while.
* Add a special case for upper-case Sigma in word-final position in `str::to_lowercase`: #26035. This is the only language-independent conditional mapping currently in `SpecialCasing.txt`.
* Stabilize `str::to_lowercase` and `str::to_uppercase`. The `&self -> String` on `str` signature seems straightforward enough, and the only relevant issue I’ve found is #24536 about naming. But `char` already has stable methods with the same name, and deprecating them for a rename doesn’t seem worth it.
r? @alexcrichton
On MSVC there are two ways that the CRT can be linked, either statically or
dynamically. Each object file produced by the compiler is compiled against
msvcrt (a dll) or libcmt (a static library). When the linker is dealing with
more than one object file, it requires that all object files link to the same
CRT, or else the linker will spit out some errors.
For now, compile code with `-MD` as it seems to appear more often in C libraries
so we'll stick with the same trend.
The text claimed 'any borrow must last for a _smaller_ scope than the
owner', however the accurate way of describing the comparison is
inclusive (i.e., 'less than or equal to' vs. 'less than').
test: Display benchmark results with thousands separators
Example display:
```
running 9 tests
test a ... bench: 0 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test b ... bench: 52 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test c ... bench: 88 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test d ... bench: 618 ns/iter (+/- 111)
test e ... bench: 5,933 ns/iter (+/- 87)
test f ... bench: 59,280 ns/iter (+/- 1,052)
test g ... bench: 588,672 ns/iter (+/- 3,381)
test h ... bench: 5,894,227 ns/iter (+/- 303,489)
test i ... bench: 59,112,382 ns/iter (+/- 1,500,110)
```
Fixes#10953Fixes#26109
* Removes `RustJITMemoryManager` from public API.
This was really sort of an implementation detail to begin with.
* `__morestack` is linked to C++ wrapper code and this pointer
is used when resolving the symbol for `ExecutionEngine` code.
* `__morestack_addr` is also resolved for `ExecutionEngine` code.
This function is sometimes referenced in LLVM-generated code,
but was not able to be resolved on Mac OS systems.
* Added Windows support to `ExecutionEngine` API.
* Added a test for basic `ExecutionEngine` functionality.
Example display:
```
running 9 tests
test a ... bench: 0 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test b ... bench: 52 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test c ... bench: 88 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test d ... bench: 618 ns/iter (+/- 111)
test e ... bench: 5,933 ns/iter (+/- 87)
test f ... bench: 59,280 ns/iter (+/- 1,052)
test g ... bench: 588,672 ns/iter (+/- 3,381)
test h ... bench: 5,894,227 ns/iter (+/- 303,489)
test i ... bench: 59,112,382 ns/iter (+/- 1,500,110)
```
Fixes#10953Fixes#26109
As per RFC#520 the syntax for arrays has changed,
this changes the remaining comments to reflect
the new syntax.
I checked for existing occurences of this with the following command:
`ag "\[., \.\..\]"` which by now should only return a single occurence.
For a user following the path of reading Chapter 5: Syntax & Symantics
prior to Chapter 4: Learn Rust, this will be the first time they have
encountered executable tests inside documentation comments.
The test will fail because the `add_one` function is not defined in
the context of the doctest. This might not be the optimal place to
introduce and explain the `/// #` notation but I think it is important
that this snippet pass as a test when `rustdoc --test` is run against
it.
