Ignore `#[cfg]`'d out code in `needless_else`
changelog: none (same release as #10810)
`#[cfg]` making things fun once more
This lead me to think about macro calls that expand to nothing as well, but apparently they produce an empty stmt in the AST so are already handled, added a test for that
r? `@llogiq`
[`default_constructed_unit_structs`]: do not lint on type alias paths
Fixes#10755.
Type aliases cannot be used as a constructor, so this lint should not trigger in those cases.
I also changed `clippy_utils::is_ty_alias` to also consider associated types since [they kinda are type aliases too](48ec50ae39/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/late/diagnostics.rs (L1520)).
changelog: [`default_constructed_unit_structs`]: do not lint on type alias paths
[`unused_async`]: do not consider `await` in nested `async` blocks as used
Fixes#10800.
This PR makes sure that `await` expressions inside of inner `async` blocks don't prevent the lint from triggering.
For example
```rs
async fn foo() {
async {
std::future::ready(()).await;
}
}
```
Even though there *is* a `.await` expression in this function, it's contained in an async block, which means that the enclosing function doesn't need to be `async` too.
changelog: [`unused_async`]: do not consider `await` in nested `async` blocks as used
Add new lint `ptr_cast_constness`
This adds a new lint which functions as the opposite side of the coin to `ptr_as_ptr`. Rather than linting only as casts that don't change constness, this lints only constness; suggesting to use `pointer::cast_const` or `pointer::cast_mut` instead.
changelog: new lint [`ptr_cast_constness`]
needless_else: new lint to check for empty `else` clauses
Empty `else` clauses are useless. They happen in the wild and are not linted yet: https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/4880/files
`else` clauses containing or preceded by comments are not linted as the comments might be important.
changelog: [`needless_else`]: new lint
Fix missing block for unsafe code
If a block is declared as unsafe, it needs an extra layer of curly braces around it.
Fixes#10808
This code adds handling for `UnsafeSource::UserProvided` block, i.e. `unsafe { ... }`. Note that we do not handle the `UnsafeSource::CompilerGenerated` as it seems to not be possible to generate that with the user code (?), or at least doesn't seem to be needed to be handled explicitly.
There is an issue with this code: it does not add an extra indentation for the unsafe blocks. I think this is a relatively minor concern for such an edge case, and should probably be done by a separate PR (fixing compile bug is more important than getting styling perfect especially when `rustfmt` will fix it anyway)
```rust
// original code
unsafe {
...
}
// code that is now generated by this PR
{ unsafe {
...
} }
// what we would ideally like to get
{
unsafe {
...
}
}
```
changelog: [`single_match`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#single_match): Fix suggestion for `unsafe` blocks
[`large_stack_arrays`]: check array initializer expressions
Fixes#10741.
Prior to this PR, the lint only checked array repeat expressions (ie. `[T; n]`). Now it also checks array initializer expressions.
changelog: [`large_stack_arrays`]: check array initializer expressions
These unit tests generate non-compilable code. I did NOT `bless` them on purpose because the stderr output is not good.
I'm surprised we don't auto-compile the suggestions here - is this something that can be easily enabled?
See #10808
Enhance `needless_collect`: lint in method/function arguments that take an `IntoIterator`
Updates `needless_collect` to also lint `collect` calls in method/function arguments that take an `IntoIterator` (for example `Extend::extend`). Every `Iterator` trivially implements `IntoIterator` and collecting it only causes an unnecessary allocation.
---
changelog: Enhancement: [`needless_collect`]: Now also detects function arguments, taking a generic `IntoIterator`
[#10777](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10777)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
fixes#10762
* Don't consider expansions of different macros to be the same, even if they expand to the same tokens
* Don't consider `cfg!` expansions to be equal if they check different configs.
* Replace variables inside | patterns in the if let: let v = if let V::A(v) | V::B(v) = v { v } else ...
* Support nested patterns: let v = if let Ok(Ok(Ok(v))) = v { v } else ...
* Support tuple structs with more than one arg: let v = V::W(v, _) = v { v } else ...
* Correctly handle .. in tuple struct patterns: let v = V::X(v, ..) = v { v } else ...
Rename `integer_arithmetic`
The lack of official feedback in #10200 made me give up on pursuing the matter but after yet another use-case that is not handled by `integer_arithmetic` (#10615), I think it is worth trying again.
---
changelog: Move/Deprecation: Rename `integer_arithmetic` to `arithmetic_side_effects`
[#10674](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10674)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
don't remove `dbg!` in arbitrary expressions
Fixes#9914
The `dbg_macro` lint replaces empty `dbg!` invocations with the empty string in its suggestion, which is not always valid code in certain contexts (e.g. `let _ = dbg!();` becomes `let _ = ;`). This PR changes it to `()`, which should always be valid where `dbg!()` is valid (`dbg!()` with no arguments evaluates to `()`).
It also special-cases "standalone" `dbg!();` expression statements, where it will suggest removing the whole statement entirely like it did before.
changelog: [`dbg_macro`]: don't remove `dbg!()` in arbitrary expressions as it sometimes results in syntax errors
fix [`invalid_regex`] not recognizing new syntax introduced after regex-1.8.0
fixes: #10680
---
changelog: fix [`invalid_regex`] not recognizing new syntax introduced after regex-1.8.0
bump up `regex-syntax` dependency version to 0.7.0
Fix: Some suggestions generated by the option_if_let_else lint did not compile
This addresses a bug in Clippy where the fix suggestend by the `option_if_let_else` lint would not compile for `Result`s which have an impure expression in the `else` branch.
---
changelog: [`option_if_let_else`]: Fixed incorrect suggestion for `Result`s
[#10337](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10337)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Fixes#10335.
