there are a few currently limitations:
* no modifications of function body
* does not handle mutability and references
* no method support
* may produce incorrect results
7310: Add assist: add lifetime to type r=matklad a=bnjjj
close#7200
7395: Obtain `ModuleId`'s `DefMap` through a method r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Once `ModuleId` can represent modules inside block expressions, this will be required in order to obtain the correct `DefMap`. Otherwise existing code might use a `LocalModuleId` from the wrong `DefMap` and cause a panic.
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
7291: Wrap remaining self/super/crate in Name{Ref} r=matklad a=Veykril
That should be the remaining special casing for `self` 🎉
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
7115: Migrate HasSource::source to return Option r=matklad a=nick96
I've made a start on fixing #6913 based on the provided work plan, migrating `HasSource::source` to return an `Option`. The simple cases are migrated but there are a few that I'm unsure exactly how they should be handled:
- Logging the processing of functions in `AnalysisStatsCmd::run`: In verbose mode it includes the path to the module containing the function and the syntax range. I've handled this with an if-let but would it be better to blow up here with `expect`? I'm not 100% on the code paths but if we're processing a function definition then the source should exist.
I've handled `source()` in all code paths as `None` being a valid return value but are there some cases where we should just blow up? Also, all I've done is bubble up the returned `None`s, there may be some places where we can recover and still provide something.
Co-authored-by: Nick Spain <nicholas.spain@stileeducation.com>
Co-authored-by: Nick Spain <nicholas.spain96@gmail.com>
Assist vs UnresolvedAssist split doesn't really pull its weight. This
is especially bad if we want to include `Assist` as a field of
diagnostics, where we'd have to make the thing generic.
* simplify code
* correctly handle crate roots and mod.rs files (nested inline modules
are still mishandled)
* make sure that new text contains a trailing newline
6896: Node-ify lifetimes r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
Let's see if this passes the tests 🤞
Depends on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/pull/15
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
6861: generate default implementation for an enum from an enum variant #6860 r=matklad a=bnjjj
close#6860
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
6586: Don't call a closure a function in the infer_function_return_type assist label r=lnicola a=Veykril
`Add this function's return type` becomes `Add this closure's return type` for closures. This makes it more obvious that we are indeed planning on modifying the closure and not its containing function.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
6553: Auto imports in completion r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/1062 but does not handle the completion order, since it's a separate task for https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4922 , https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4922 and maybe something else.
2 quirks in the current implementation:
* traits are not auto imported during method completion
If I understand the current situation right, we cannot search for traits by a **part** of a method name, we need a full name with correct case to get a trait for it.
* VSCode (?) autocompletion is not as rigid as in Intellij Rust as you can notice on the animation.
Intellij is able to refresh the completions on every new symbol added, yet VS Code does not query the completions on every symbol for me.
With a few debug prints placed in RA, I've observed the following behaviour: after the first set of completion suggestions is received, next symbol input does not trigger a server request, if the completions contain this symbol.
When more symbols added, the existing completion suggestions are filtered out until none are left and only then, on the next symbol it queries for completions.
It seems like the only alternative to get an updated set of results is to manually retrigger it with Esc and Ctrl + Space.
Despite the eerie latter bullet, the completion seems to work pretty fine and fast nontheless, but if you have any ideas on how to make it more smooth, I'll gladly try it out.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
