resolve: Improve import failure detection and lay groundwork for RFC 1422
This PR improves import failure detection and lays some groundwork for RFC 1422.
More specifically, it
- Avoids recomputing the resolution of an import directive's module path.
- Refactors code in `resolve_imports` that does not scale to the arbitrarily many levels of visibility that will be required by RFC 1422.
- Replaces `ModuleS`'s fields `public_glob_count`, `private_glob_count`, and `resolved_globs` with a list of glob import directives `globs`.
- Replaces `NameResolution`'s fields `pub_outstanding_references` and `outstanding_references` with a field `single_imports` of a newly defined type `SingleImports`.
- Improves import failure detection by detecting cycles that include single imports (currently, only cycles of globs are detected). This fixes#32119.
r? @nikomatsakis
resolve: Minimize hacks in name resolution of primitive types
When resolving the first unqualified segment in a path with `n` segments and `n - 1` associated item segments, e.g. (`a` or `a::assoc` or `a::assoc::assoc` etc) try to resolve `a` without considering primitive types first. If the "normal" lookup fails or results in a module, then try to resolve `a` as a primitive type as a fallback.
This way backward compatibility is respected, but the restriction from E0317 can be lifted, i.e. primitive names mostly can be shadowed like any other names.
Furthermore, if names of primitive types are [put into prelude](https://github.com/petrochenkov/rust/tree/prim2) (now it's possible to do), then most of names will be resolved in conventional way and amount of code relying on this fallback will be greatly reduced. Although, it's not entirely convenient to put them into prelude right now due to temporary conflicts like `use prelude::v1::*; use usize;` in libcore/libstd, I'd better wait for proper glob shadowing before doing it.
I wish the `no_prelude` attribute were unstable as intended :(
cc @jseyfried @arielb1
r? @eddyb
The initial wording does not make sense due to an extra 'to'.
There are two potential candidates we can change this to:
- 'you can import it into scope'
- 'to import it into scope'
In keeping the changes minimal, we choose the first, as this is more in line with the grammar of the extended candidates help message.
Fix name resolution in lexical scopes
Currently, `resolve_item_in_lexical_scope` does not check the "ribs" (type parameters and local variables). This can allow items that should be shadowed by type parameters to be named.
For example,
```rust
struct T { i: i32 }
fn f<T>() {
let t = T { i: 0 }; // This use of `T` resolves to the struct, not the type parameter
}
mod Foo {
pub fn f() {}
}
fn g<Foo>() {
Foo::f(); // This use of `Foo` resolves to the module, not the type parameter
}
```
This PR changes `resolve_item_in_lexical_scope` so that it fails when the item is shadowed by a rib (fixes#32120).
This is a [breaking-change], but it looks unlikely to cause breakage in practice.
r? @nikomatsakis
This PR privacy checks paths as they are resolved instead of in `librustc_privacy` (fixes#12334 and fixes#31779). This removes the need for the `LastPrivate` system introduced in PR #9735, the limitations of which cause #31779.
This PR also reports privacy violations in paths to intra- and inter-crate items the same way -- it always reports the first inaccessible segment of the path.
Since it fixes#31779, this is a [breaking-change]. For example, the following code would break:
```rust
mod foo {
pub use foo::bar::S;
mod bar { // `bar` should be private to `foo`
pub struct S;
}
}
impl foo::S {
fn f() {}
}
fn main() {
foo::bar::S::f(); // This is now a privacy error
}
```
r? @alexcrichton
