Move `DepKind` to `rustc_query_system` and define it as `u16`
This moves the `DepKind` type to `rustc_query_system` where it's defined with an inner `u16` field. This decouples it from `rustc_middle` and is a step towards letting other crates define dep kinds. It also allows some type parameters to be removed. The `DepKind` trait is replaced with a `Deps` trait. That's used when some operations or information about dep kinds which is unavailable in `rustc_query_system` are still needed.
r? `@cjgillot`
This happens because variances are constructed from ty generics,
and ty generics are always constructed with lifetimes first.
See compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/collect/generics_of.rs:248-269
Fixes#83556
rustc_hir_analysis: add a helper to check function the signature mismatches
This function is now used to check `#[panic_handler]`, `start` lang item, `main`, `#[start]` and intrinsic functions.
The diagnosis produced are now closer to the ones produced by trait/impl method signature mismatch.
This is the first time I do anything with rustc_hir_analysis/rustc_hir_typeck, so comments and suggestions about things I did wrong or that could be improved will be appreciated.
Suggest desugaring to return-position `impl Future` when an `async fn` in trait fails an auto trait bound
First commit allows us to store the span of the `async` keyword in HIR.
Second commit implements a suggestion to desugar an `async fn` to a return-position `impl Future` in trait to slightly improve the `Send` situation being discussed in #115822.
This suggestion is only made when `#![feature(return_type_notation)]` is not enabled -- if it is, we should instead suggest an appropriate where-clause bound.
coverage: Don't bother renumbering expressions on the Rust side
The LLVM API that we use to encode coverage mappings already has its own code for removing unused coverage expressions and renumbering the rest.
This lets us get rid of our own complex renumbering code, making it easier to change our coverage code in other ways.
---
Now that we have tests for coverage mappings (#114843), I've been able to verify that this PR doesn't make the coverage mappings worse, thanks to an explicit simplification step.
interpret: more consistently use ImmTy in operators and casts
The diff in src/tools/miri/src/shims/x86/sse2.rs should hopefully suffice to explain why this is nicer. :)
Delete obsolete `--disable-per-crate-search` rustdoc flag
This unstable flag is unused by rustdoc since ef96d573bf.
We should avoid landing this until after https://github.com/rust-lang/docs.rs/pull/2225 is deployed to docs.rs.
Call panic_display directly in const_panic_fmt.
`panic_str` just directly calls `panic_display`. The only reason `panic_str` exists, is for a lint to detect an expansion of `panic_2015!(expr)` (which expands to `panic_str`).
It is `panic_display` that is hooked by const-eval, which is the reason we call it here.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116005
r? ``@oli-obk``
rename mir::Constant -> mir::ConstOperand, mir::ConstKind -> mir::Const
Also, be more consistent with the `to/eval_bits` methods... we had some that take a type and some that take a size, and then sometimes the one that takes a type is called `bits_for_ty`.
Turns out that `ty::Const`/`mir::ConstKind` carry their type with them, so we don't need to even pass the type to those `eval_bits` functions at all.
However this is not properly consistent yet: in `ty` we have most of the methods on `ty::Const`, but in `mir` we have them on `mir::ConstKind`. And indeed those two types are the ones that correspond to each other. So `mir::ConstantKind` should actually be renamed to `mir::Const`. But what to do with `mir::Constant`? It carries around a span, that's really more like a constant operand that appears as a MIR operand... it's more suited for `syntax.rs` than `consts.rs`, but the bigger question is, which name should it get if we want to align the `mir` and `ty` types? `ConstOperand`? `ConstOp`? `Literal`? It's not a literal but it has a field called `literal` so it would at least be consistently wrong-ish...
``@oli-obk`` any ideas?
Prevent promotion of const fn calls in inline consts
We don't wanna make that mistake we did for statics and consts worse by letting more code use it.
r? ``@RalfJung``
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76001
Improve invalid UTF-8 lint by finding the expression initializer
This PR introduce a small mechanism to walk up the HIR through bindings, if/else, consts, ... when trying lint on invalid UTF-8.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115208
The LLVM API that we use to encode coverage mappings already has its own code
for removing unused coverage expressions and renumbering the rest.
This lets us get rid of our own complex renumbering code, making it easier to
change our coverage code in other ways.
After coverage instrumentation and MIR transformations, we can sometimes end up
with coverage expressions that always have a value of zero. Any expression
operand that refers to an always-zero expression can be replaced with a literal
`Operand::Zero`, making the emitted coverage mapping data smaller and simpler.
This simplification step is mostly redundant with the simplifications performed
inline in `expressions_with_regions`, except that it does a slightly more
thorough job in some cases (because it checks for always-zero expressions
*after* other simplifications).
However, adding this simplification step will then let us greatly simplify that
code, without affecting the quality of the emitted coverage maps.
implement `intercrate_ambiguity_causes` in the new solver
I added some comments but this is still somewhat of a mess. I think we should for the most part be able to treat all of this as a black box, so I can accept that this code isn't too great.
I also believe that some of the weirdness here is unavoidable, as proof trees - and their visitor - hide semantically relevant information, so they cannot perfectly represent the actual solver behavior.
There are some known bugs here when testing with `./x.py test tests/ui --bless -- --target-rustcflags -Ztrait-solver=next-coherence`. While I haven't diagnosed them all in detail I believe we are able to handle them all separately
- `structurally_normalize` currently does not normalize opaque types, resulting in divergence between the solver internal `trait_ref_is_knowable` and the one when computing intercrate ambiguity causes.
- we don't add an `intercrate_ambiguity_cause` for reserved impls
- we should `deeply_normalize` the trait ref before printing it, that requires a "best effort" version of `deeply_normalize`
r? `@compiler-errors`
Fix `ui-fulldeps --stage=1` with `-Zignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks`
Fixes#115977
Also makes sure this doesn't happen again by running `ui-fulldeps --stage=1` in CI
Fall back to the unoptimized implementation in read_binary_file if File::metadata lies
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115458
r? `@jackh726` because you approved the previous PR
