Recursive items are currently detected in the `check_const` pass which runs after type checking. This means a recursive static item used as an array length will cause type checking to blow the stack. This PR separates the recursion check out into a separate pass which is run before type checking.
Closes issue #17252
r? @nick29581
Avoids warnings during bootstrap, similar to:
src/librustc/lib.rs:149:1: 149:39 warning: diagnostic code E0099 never used
src/librustc/lib.rs:149 __build_diagnostic_array!(DIAGNOSTICS)
All of these codes stopped being used in this commit:
688ddf7 ("typeck/kind -- stop using old trait framework.")
See also similar fix: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/16449
This prevents confusing errors when accidentally using an assignment
in an `if` expression. For example:
```rust
fn main() {
let x = 1u;
if x = x {
println!("{}", x);
}
}
```
Previously, this yielded:
```
test.rs:4:16: 4:17 error: expected `:`, found `!`
test.rs:4 println!("{}", x);
^
```
With this change, it now yields:
```
test.rs:3:8: 3:13 error: mismatched types: expected `bool`, found `()` (expected bool, found ())
test.rs:3 if x = x {
^~~~~
```
Closes issue #17283
As per [RFC 52](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/active/0052-ownership-variants.md), use `_mut` suffixes to mark mutable variants, and `into_iter` for moving iterators. Additional details and motivation in the RFC.
Note that the iterator *type* names are not changed by this RFC; those are awaiting a separate RFC for standardization.
Closes#13660Closes#16810
[breaking-change]
This is part of the migration of crates into the Cargo ecosystem. There
is now an external repository https://github.com/rust-lang/num for bignums.
The single use of libnum elsewhere in the repository is for a shootout
benchmark, which is being moved into the external crate.
Due to deprecation, this is a:
[breaking-change]
lifetime bounds. This doesn't really cause any difficulties, because
we already had to accommodate the fact that multiple implicit bounds
could accumulate. Object types still require precisely one lifetime
bound. This is a pre-step towards generalized where clauses (once you
have lifetime bounds in where clauses, it is harder to restrict them
to exactly one).
Currently the ZSH completions are quite old an nearly useless. This
brings them up to be compatible with current rust and makes them far
more useful.
Closes#17305
This patch does not make many functional changes, but does a lot of restructuring towards the goals of #5527. This is the biggest patch, basically, that should enable most of the other patches in a relatively straightforward way.
Major changes:
- Do not track impls through trans, instead recompute as needed.
- Isolate trait matching code into its own module, carefully structure to distinguish various phases (selection vs confirmation vs fulfillment)
- Consider where clauses in their more general form
- Integrate checking of builtin bounds into the trait matching process, rather than doing it separately in kind.rs (important for opt-in builtin bounds)
What is not included:
- Where clauses are still not generalized. This should be a straightforward follow-up patch.
- Caching. I did not include much caching. I have plans for various kinds of caching we can do. Should be straightforward. Preliminary perf measurements suggested that this branch keeps compilation times roughly what they are.
- Method resolution. The initial algorithm I proposed for #5527 does not work as well as I hoped. I have a revised plan which is much more similar to what we do today.
- Deref vs deref-mut. The initial fix I had worked great for autoderef, but not for explicit deref.
- Permitting blanket impls to overlap with specific impls. Initial plan to consider all nested obligations before considering an impl to match caused many compilation errors. We have a revised plan but it is not implemented here, should be a relatively straightforward extension.
The wording is correct if you consider that two of these lines were extracted from the original example. It still tripped me up while reading, so i just removed any reference to the linecount.
This closes#17260. The guide references the old install location for
the windows rust install before it was split into 64bit and 32bit
installers. This adds a link to each binary.
1000 tasks * 2MiB stack size -> 2GiB of virtual memory
On a 64-bit OS, a 32-bit executable has 4GiB available, but the kernel
gets half of the available address space so the limit is 2GiB on 32-bit.
Closes#17044
I'm rotating in some CentOS 5.10 bots so we *actually* build on Linux 2.6.18
like we advertise doing so. Currently the snapshots are incompatible with CentOS
5.10 due to snapshots requiring glibc 2.6 and CentOS 5.10 having glibc 2.5.
It turns out that rustc only requires *one* symbol from glibc 2.6, which is
`futimens`. The rust distribution itself does not use this symbol, but LLVM
conditionally detects it and then uses it. This symbol isn't even called as part
of the compilation process, so we don't even need it!
The new snapshot was generated following these instructions [1]:
1. Download the current x86_64 linux snapshot and unpack it.
2. Open the rustc binary in a hex editor.
3. Change the linkage against glibc 2.6 from strong to *weak*
4. Write changes and re-run src/etc/make-snapshot.py
5. Upload new tarball to S3
On CentOS 5.10 a warning is printed each time the snapshot runs that the symbol
cannot be found (anyone with glibc 2.6+ does not have this warning printed). The
key part is that we can *bootstrap* on CentOS 5.10 at this point. The next
snapshot will be naturally compatible with glibc 2.3 (even older!) and will not
need to be manually edited.
[1]: http://jamesbond3142.no-ip.org/wiki/wiki.cgi/NewAppsOnOldGlibc
I'm rotating in some CentOS 5.10 bots so we *actually* build on Linux 2.6.18
like we advertise doing so. Currently the snapshots are incompatible with CentOS
5.10 due to snapshots requiring glibc 2.6 and CentOS 5.10 having glibc 2.5.
It turns out that rustc only requires *one* symbol from glibc 2.6, which is
`futimens`. The rust distribution itself does not use this symbol, but LLVM
conditionally detects it and then uses it. This symbol isn't even called as part
of the compilation process, so we don't even need it!
The new snapshot was generated following these instructions [1]:
1. Download the current x86_64 linux snapshot and unpack it.
2. Open the rustc binary in a hex editor.
3. Change the linkage against glibc 2.6 from strong to *weak*
4. Write changes and re-run src/etc/make-snapshot.py
5. Upload new tarball to S3
On CentOS 5.10 a warning is printed each time the snapshot runs that the symbol
cannot be found (anyone with glibc 2.6+ does not have this warning printed). The
key part is that we can *bootstrap* on CentOS 5.10 at this point. The next
snapshot will be naturally compatible with glibc 2.3 (even older!) and will not
need to be manually edited.
[1]: http://jamesbond3142.no-ip.org/wiki/wiki.cgi/NewAppsOnOldGlibc
Adds a new configure flag, --release-channel, which determines how the version
number should be augmented with a release label, as well as how the distribution
artifacts will be named. This is entirely for use by the build automation.
--release-channel can be either 'source', 'nightly', 'beta', or 'stable'.
Here's a summary of the affect of these values on version number and
artifact naming, respectively:
* source - '0.12.0-pre', 'rust-0.12.0-pre-...'
* nightly - '0.12.0-nightly', 'rust-nightly-...'
* beta - '0.12.0-beta', 'rust-beta-...'
* stable - '0.12.0', 'rust-0.12.0-...'
Per http://discuss.rust-lang.org/t/rfc-impending-changes-to-the-release-process/508/1
