Also cleanup the treatment of mutability in mem_categorization, which still
included the concept of interior mutability. At some point, we should
refactor the types to exclude the possibility of interior mutability rather
than just ignoring the mutability value in those cases.
to favor inherent methods over extension methods.
The reason to favor inherent methods is that otherwise an impl
like
impl Foo for @Foo { fn method(&self) { self.method() } }
causes infinite recursion. The current change to favor inherent methods is
rather hacky; the method resolution code is in need of a refactoring.
what amount a T* pointer must be adjusted to reach the contents
of the box. For `~T` types, this requires knowing the type `T`,
which is not known in the case of objects.
This can be applied to statics and it will indicate that LLVM will attempt to
merge the constant in .data with other statics.
I have preliminarily applied this to all of the statics generated by the new
`ifmt!` syntax extension. I compiled a file with 1000 calls to `ifmt!` and a
separate file with 1000 calls to `fmt!` to compare the sizes, and the results
were:
```
fmt 310k
ifmt (before) 529k
ifmt (after) 202k
```
This now means that ifmt! is both faster and smaller than fmt!, yay!
When there is only a single store to the ret slot that dominates the
load that gets the value for the "ret" instruction, we can elide the
ret slot and directly return the operand of the dominating store
instruction. This is the same thing that clang does, except for a
special case that doesn't seem to affect us.
Fixes#8238
When there is only a single store to the ret slot that dominates the
load that gets the value for the "ret" instruction, we can elide the
ret slot and directly return the operand of the dominating store
instruction. This is the same thing that clang does, except for a
special case that doesn't seem to affect us.
Fixes#8238
r? @graydon Also, notably, make rustpkgtest depend on the rustpkg executable (otherwise, tests that shell out to rustpgk might run when rustpkg doesn't exist).
This commit allows you to write:
extern mod x = "a/b/c";
which means rustc will search in the RUST_PATH for a package with
ID a/b/c, and bind it to the name `x` if it's found.
Incidentally, move get_relative_to from back::rpath into std::path
This can be applied to statics and it will indicate that LLVM will attempt to
merge the constant in .data with other statics.
I have preliminarily applied this to all of the statics generated by the new
`ifmt!` syntax extension. I compiled a file with 1000 calls to `ifmt!` and a
separate file with 1000 calls to `fmt!` to compare the sizes, and the results
were:
fmt 310k
ifmt (before) 529k
ifmt (after) 202k
This now means that ifmt! is both faster and smaller than fmt!, yay!
env! aborts compilation of the specified environment variable is not
defined and takes an optional second argument containing a custom
error message. option_env! creates an Option<&'static str> containing
the value of the environment variable.
There are no run-pass tests that check the behavior when the environment
variable is defined since the test framework doesn't support setting
environment variables at compile time as opposed to runtime. However,
both env! and option_env! are used inside of rustc itself, which should
act as a sufficient test.
Fixes#2248.
Code that collects fields in struct-like patterns used to ignore
wildcard patterns like `Foo{_}`. But `enter_defaults` considered
struct-like patterns as default in order to overcome this
(accoring to my understanding of situation).
However such behaviour caused code like this:
```
enum E {
Foo{f: int},
Bar
}
let e = Bar;
match e {
Foo{f: _f} => { /* do something (1) */ }
_ => { /* do something (2) */ }
}
```
consider pattern `Foo{f: _f}` as default. That caused inproper behaviour
and even segfaults while trying to destruct `Bar` as `Foo{f: _f}`.
Issues: #5625 , #5530.
This patch fixes `collect_record_or_struct_fields` to split cases of
single wildcard struct-like pattern and no struct-like pattern at all.
Former case resolved with `enter_rec_or_struct` (and not with
`enter_defaults`).
Closes#5625.
Closes#5530.
env! aborts compilation of the specified environment variable is not
defined and takes an optional second argument containing a custom
error message. option_env! creates an Option<&'static str> containing
the value of the environment variable.
There are no run-pass tests that check the behavior when the environment
variable is defined since the test framework doesn't support setting
environment variables at compile time as opposed to runtime. However,
both env! and option_env! are used inside of rustc itself, which should
act as a sufficient test.
Close#2248
According to #7887, we've decided to use the syntax of `fn map<U>(f: &fn(&T) -> U) -> U`, which passes a reference to the closure, and to `fn map_move<U>(f: &fn(T) -> U) -> U` which moves the value into the closure. This PR adds these `.map_move()` functions to `Option` and `Result`.
In addition, it has these other minor features:
* Replaces a couple uses of `option.get()`, `result.get()`, and `result.get_err()` with `option.unwrap()`, `result.unwrap()`, and `result.unwrap_err()`. (See #8268 and #8288 for a more thorough adaptation of this functionality.
* Removes `option.take_map()` and `option.take_map_default()`. These two functions can be easily written as `.take().map_move(...)`.
* Adds a better error message to `result.unwrap()` and `result.unwrap_err()`.
Code like this is fixed now:
```
fn foo(p: [u8, ..4]) {
match p {
[a, b, c, d] => {}
};
}
```
Invalid constructors are not reported as errors yet:
```
fn foo(p: [u8, ..4]) {
match p {
[_, _, _] => {} // this should be error
[_, _, _, _, _, .._] => {} // and this
_ => {}
}
}
```
Issue #8311 is partially fixed by this commit. Fixed-length arrays in
let statement are not yet allowed:
```
let [a, b, c] = [1, 2, 3]; // still fails
```
Code that collects fields in struct-like patterns used to ignore
wildcard patterns like `Foo{_}`. But `enter_defaults` considered
struct-like patterns as default in order to overcome this
(accoring to my understanding of situation).
However such behaviour caused code like this:
```
enum E {
Foo{f: int},
Bar
}
let e = Bar;
match e {
Foo{f: _f} => { /* do something (1) */ }
_ => { /* do something (2) */ }
}
```
consider pattern `Foo{f: _f}` as default. That caused inproper behaviour
and even segfaults while trying to destruct `Bar` as `Foo{f: _f}`.
Issues: #5625 , #5530.
This patch fixes `collect_record_or_struct_fields` to split cases of
single wildcard struct-like pattern and no struct-like pattern at all.
Former case resolved with `enter_rec_or_struct` (and not with
`enter_defaults`).
Closes#5625.
Closes#5530.
