Fix `dropping_copy_types` lint from linting in match-arm with side-effects
This PR fixes an issue with the `dropping_copy_types` and `dropping_references` lints when not all patterns that can have side-effects were detected and ignored.
Nearly _fixes_ https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112653 (will need beta-backport to completely fix the issue)
r? ``@Nilstrieb``
Implement most of MCP510
This implements most of what remains to be done for MCP510:
- turns `-C link-self-contained` into a `+`/`-` list of components, like `-C link-self-contained=+linker,+crto,+libc,+unwind,+sanitizers,+mingw`. The scaffolding is present for all these expected components to be implemented and stabilized in the future on their own time. This PR only handles the `-Zgcc-ld=lld` subset of these link-self-contained components as `-Clink-self-contained=+linker`
- handles `-C link-self-contained=y|n` as-is today, for compatibility with `rustc_codegen_ssa:🔙🔗:self_contained`'s [explicit opt-in and opt-out](9eee230cd0/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/link.rs (L1671-L1676)).
- therefore supports our plan to opt out of `rust-lld` (when it's enabled by default) even for current `-Clink-self-contained` users, with e.g. `-Clink-self-contained -Clink-self-contained=-linker`
- turns `add_gcc_ld_path` into its expected final form, by using the `-C link-self-contained=+linker` CLI flag, and whether the `LinkerFlavor` has the expected `Cc::Yes` and `Lld::Yes` shape (this is not yet the case in practice for any CLI linker flavor)
- makes the [new clean linker flavors](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96827#issuecomment-1208441595) selectable in the CLI in addition to the legacy ones, in order to opt-in to using `cc` and `lld` to emulate `-Zgcc-ld=lld`
- ensure the new `-C link-self-contained` components, and `-C linker-flavor`s are unstable, and require `-Z unstable-options` to be used
The up-to-date set of flags for the future stable CLI version of `-Zgcc-ld=lld` is currently: `-Clink-self-contained=+linker -Clinker-flavor=gnu-lld-cc -Zunstable-options`.
It's possible we'll also need to do something for distros that don't ship `rust-lld`, but maybe there are already no tool search paths to be added to `cc` in this situation anyways.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Error when RPITITs' hidden types capture more lifetimes than their trait definitions
This implements a stricter set of captures rules for RPITITs. They now may only capture:
1. Lifetimes from the impl header (both the self type and any trait substs -- we may want to restrict just to the self type's lifetimes, but the PR makes that easy to do, too)
2. Lifetimes mentioned by the `impl Trait` in the trait method's definition.
Namely, they may not mention lifetimes from the method (early or late) that are not mentioned in the `impl Trait`.
cc #105258 which I think was trying to do this too, though I'm not super familiar with what exactly differs from that or why that one was broken.
cc #112194 (doesn't fix this issue per se, because it's still an open question, but I think this is objectively better than the status quo, and gets us closer to resolving that issue.)
Technically is a fix for the ICE in #108580, but it turns that issue into an error now. We can decide separately whether or not nested RPITITs should capture lifetimes from their parents.
r? ``@oli-obk``
fix(resolve): skip assertion judgment when NonModule is dummy
Fixes#85992
## Why #85992 panic
During `resolve_imports`, the `path_res` of the import `issue_85992_extern_2::Outcome` is pointing to `external::issue_85992_extern_2` instead of `crate::issue_85992_extern_2`. As a result `import.imported_module.set` had been executed.
Attached 1: the state of `early_resolve_ident_in_lexical_scope` during the `resolve_imports` for `use issue_85992_extern_2::Outcome` is as follows:
|iter in `visit_scopes` | `scope` | `result.binding` |
| - | - | - |
| init | - | - |
| 0 | `CrateRoot` | Err(Determined) |
| 1 | `ExternPrelude` | pointing to the `issue_85992_extern_2`(external) |
However, during finalization for `issue_85992_extern_2::Outcome`, the `innermost_result` was pointed to `crate::issue_85992_extern_2` and no ambiguity was generated, leading to a panic.
Attached 2: the state of `early_resolve_ident_in_lexical_scope` during the `finalize_import` for `use issue_85992_extern_2::Outcome` is as follows:
|iter in `visit_scopes` | `scope` | `result.binding` | `innermost_result` |
| - | - | - | - |
| init | - | - | `None` |
| 0 | `CrateRoot` | pointing to `use crate::issue_85992_extern_2` **(introdcued by dummy)** | same as `result` but with a `Some` wapper|
| 1 | `ExternPrelude` | pointing to the `issue_85992_extern_2`(external) | smae as above |
## Try to solve
Skip assertion judgment when `NonModule` is dummy
r? `@petrochenkov`
Test benchmarks with `-Z panic-abort-tests`
During test execution, when a `#[bench]` benchmark is encountered it's executed once to check whether it works. Unfortunately that was not compatible with `-Z panic-abort-tests`: the feature works by spawning a subprocess for each test, which prevents the use of dynamic tests as we cannot pass closures to child processes, and before this PR the conversion from benchmark to test was done by turning benchmarks into dynamic tests whose closures execute the benchmark once.
The approach this PR took was to add two new kinds of `TestFn`s: `StaticBenchAsTestFn` and `DynBenchAsTestFn` (⚠️ **this is a breaking change** ⚠️). With that change, a `StaticBenchFn` can be converted into a `StaticBenchAsTestFn` without creating dynamic tests, and making it possible to test `#[bench]` functions with `-Z panic-abort-tests`. The subprocess test runner also had to be updated to perform the conversion from benchmark to test when appropriate.
Along with the bug fix, in the first commit I refactored how tests are executed: rather than executing the test function in multiple places across `libtest`, there is now a private `TestFn::into_runnable()` method, which returns either a `RunnableTest` or `RunnableBench`, on which you can call the `run()` method. This simplified the rest of the changes in the PR.
This PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73509
Use structured suggestion when telling user about `for<'a>`
```
error[E0637]: `&` without an explicit lifetime name cannot be used here
--> $DIR/E0637.rs:13:13
|
LL | T: Into<&u32>,
| ^ explicit lifetime name needed here
|
help: consider introducing a higher-ranked lifetime here
|
LL | T: for<'a> Into<&'a u32>,
| +++++++ ++
```
Encode item bounds for `DefKind::ImplTraitPlaceholder`
This was lost in a refactoring -- `hir::ItemKind::OpaqueTy` doesn't always map to `DefKind::Opaque`, specifically for RPITITs, so the check was migrated subtly wrong, and unfortunately I never had a test for this 🙃Fixes#113155
r? ``@cjgillot``
Account for late-bound vars from parent arg-position impl trait
We should be reporting an error like we do for late-bound args coming from a parent APIT.
Fixes#113016
suggest `slice::swap` for `mem::swap(&mut x[0], &mut x[1])` borrowck error
Recently saw someone ask why this code (example slightly modified):
```rs
fn main() {
let mut foo = [1, 2];
std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
}
```
triggers this error and how to fix it:
```
error[E0499]: cannot borrow `foo[_]` as mutable more than once at a time
--> src/main.rs:4:33
|
4 | std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
| -------------- ----------- ^^^^^^^^^^^ second mutable borrow occurs here
| | |
| | first mutable borrow occurs here
| first borrow later used by call
|
= help: consider using `.split_at_mut(position)` or similar method to obtain two mutable non-overlapping sub-slices
```
The current help message is nice and goes in the right direction, but I think we can do better for this specific instance and suggest `slice::swap`, which makes this compile
```
error[E0637]: `&` without an explicit lifetime name cannot be used here
--> $DIR/E0637.rs:13:13
|
LL | T: Into<&u32>,
| ^ explicit lifetime name needed here
|
help: consider introducing a higher-ranked lifetime here
|
LL | T: for<'a> Into<&'a u32>,
| +++++++ ++
```
Normalize opaques with late-bound vars again
We have a hack in the compiler where if an opaque has escaping late-bound vars, we skip revealing it even though we *could* reveal it from a technical perspective. First of all, this is weird, since we really should be revealing all opaques in `Reveal::All` mode. Second of all, it causes subtle bugs (linked below).
I attempted to fix this in #100980, which was unfortunately reverted due to perf regressions on codebases that used really deeply nested futures in some interesting ways. The worst of which was #103423, which caused the project to hang on build. Another one was #104842, which was just a slow-down, but not a hang. I took some time afterwards to investigate how to rework `normalize_erasing_regions` to take advantage of better caching, but that effort kinda fizzled out (#104133).
However, recently, I was made aware of more bugs whose root cause is not revealing opaques during codegen. That made me want to fix this again -- in the process, interestingly, I took the the minimized example from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103423#issuecomment-1292947043, and it doesn't seem to hang any more...
Thinking about this harder, there have been some changes to the way we lower and typecheck async futures that may have reduced the pathologically large number of outlives obligations (see description of #103423) that we were encountering when normalizing opaques with bound vars the last time around:
* #104321 (lower `async { .. }` directly as a generator that implements `Future`, removing the `from_generator` shim)
* #104833 (removing an `identity_future` fn that was wrapping desugared future generators)
... so given that I can see:
* No significant regression on rust perf bot (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1600070317)
* No timeouts in crater run I did (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605428952, rechecked failing crates in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605973434)
... and given that this PR:
* Fixes#104601
* Fixes#107557
* Fixes#109464
* Allows us to remove a `DefiningAnchor::Bubble` from codegen (75a8f681837c70051e0200a14f58ae07dbe58e66)
I'm inclined to give this another shot at landing this. Best case, it just works -- worst case, we get more examples to study how we need to improve the compiler to make this work.
r? types
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #112946 (Improve cgu naming and ordering)
- #113048 (Fix build on Solaris where fd-lock cannot be used.)
- #113100 (Fix display of long items in search results)
- #113107 (add check for ConstKind::Value(_) to in_operand())
- #113119 (rustdoc: Reduce internal function visibility.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Test that we require implementing trait items whose bounds don't hold in the current impl
I initially tried to make most of these pass, but that's a big can of worms, so I'm just adding them as tests, considering we have no tests for these things.
Make associated type bounds in supertrait position implied
`trait A: B<Assoc: C> {}` should be able to imply both `Self: B` and `<Self as B>::Assoc: C`. Adjust the way that we collect implied predicates to do so.
Fixes#112573Fixes#112568
add check for ConstKind::Value(_) to in_operand()
Added check for valtree value to close#113012 which fixes the issue, although I am not sure if adding the check there is sound or not cc `@oli-obk`
add note for non-exhaustive matches with guards
Associated issue: #92197
When a match statement includes guards on every match arm (and is therefore necessarily non-exhaustive), add a note to the error E0004 diagnostic noting this.
Validate fluent variable references in tests
Closes#101109
Under `cfg(test)`, the `fluent_messages` macro will emit a list of variables referenced by each message and its attributes. The derive attribute will now emit a `#[test]` that checks that each referenced variable exists in the structure it's applied to.
mir opt + codegen: handle subtyping
fixes#107205
the same issue was caused in multiple places:
- mir opts: both copy and destination propagation
- codegen: assigning operands to locals (which also propagates values)
I changed codegen to always update the type in the operands used for locals which should guard against any new occurrences of this bug going forward. I don't know how to make mir optimizations more resilient here. Hopefully the added tests will be enough to detect any trivially wrong optimizations going forward.
