Allow varargs for libc::open when it is allowed by the second argument
This PR allows `libc::open` to be called using two or three arguments as defined in https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html
The presence of the third argument depends on the value of the second argument. If the second argument dictates that the third argument is *required* miri will emit an error if the argument is missing. If the second argument does *not* require a third argument, then the argument is ignored and passed as 0 internally (it would be ignored by libc anyway)
add flag to forward specific env vars (while isolation remains enabled)
The flag is called `-Zmiri-env-forward=<var>`, but I am open to bikeshedding. ;)
exclude mutable references to !Unpin types from uniqueness guarantees
This basically works around https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/148 by not requiring uniqueness any more for mutable references to self-referential generators. That corresponds to [the same work-around that was applied in rustc itself](b815532674/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/layout.rs (L2482)).
I am not entirely sure if this is a good idea since it might hide too many errors in case types are "accidentally" `!Unpin`. OTOH, our test suite still passes, and to my knowledge the vast majority of types is `Unpin`. (`place.layout.ty` is monomorphic, we should always exactly know which type this is.)
intptrcast: Never allocate two objects directly adjecent
When two objects directly follow each other in memory, what is the
provenance of an integer cast to a pointer that points directly between
them? For a zero-size region, it could point into the end of the first
object, or the start of the second.
We can avoid answering this difficult question by simply never
allocating two objects directly beside each other. This fixes some of
the false positives from #1866.
When two objects directly follow each other in memory, what is the
provenance of an integer cast to a pointer that points directly between
them? For a zero-size region, it could point into the end of the first
object, or the start of the second.
We can avoid answering this difficult question by simply never
allocating two objects directly beside each other. This fixes some of
the false positives from #1866.
also ignore 'thread leaks' with -Zmiri-ignore-leaks
This is a step towards https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1371. The remaining hard part would be supporting checking for memory leaks when there are threads still running. For now we elegantly avoid this problem by using the same flag to control both of these checks. :)
Change the code to either `EACCES` (if the op is performed on the
path), or `EBADF` (if the op is performed the fd)
Updated ops: `stat`, `opendir`, `ftruncate64`, and `readlink`
Add a new test for fs ops in isolation.
Report an error if a `#[no_mangle]`/`#[export_name = ...]` function has the same symbol name as a built-in shim
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1776#issuecomment-821322605.
The error looks like this:
```
error: found `malloc` symbol definition that clashes with a built-in shim
--> tests/compile-fail/function_calls/exported_symbol_shim_clashing.rs:12:9
|
12 | malloc(0);
| ^^^^^^^^^ found `malloc` symbol definition that clashes with a built-in shim
|
help: the `malloc` symbol is defined here
--> tests/compile-fail/function_calls/exported_symbol_shim_clashing.rs:2:1
|
2 | / extern "C" fn malloc(_: usize) -> *mut std::ffi::c_void {
3 | | //~^ HELP the `malloc` symbol is defined here
4 | | unreachable!()
5 | | }
| |_^
= note: inside `main` at tests/compile-fail/function_calls/exported_symbol_shim_clashing.rs:12:9
```
This does not implement "better error messages than we do currently for arg/ABI mismatches" in https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1776#issuecomment-821343175 -- I failed to remove all `check_arg_count()` and `check_abi()` (they are still used in `src/shims/intrinsics.rs` and `call_dlsym()`) and they don't receive the name of the shim.
Add support for panicking in the emulated application when unsupported functionality is encountered
This PR fixes#1807 and allows an optional flag to be specified to panic when an unsupported syscall is encountered. In essence, instead of bubbling up an error in the context of the Miri application Miri will panic within the context of the *emulated* application. This feature is desired to allow CI pipelines to determine if a Miri failure is unsupported functionality or actual UB. Please read [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1807#issuecomment-845425076) for the rationale behind this change.
Note: this change does not cover all cases where unsupported functionality errors may be raised. If you search the repo for `throw_unsup_format!` there are many cases that I think are less likely to occur and may still be problematic for some folks.
TODO:
- [x] README documentation on this new flag
- [x] Add tests
In user interface, added a new flag `-Zmiri-isolation-error` which
takes one of the four values -- hide, warn, warn-nobacktrace, and
abort. This option can be used to configure Miri to either abort or
return an error code upon executing isolated op. If not aborted, Miri
prints a warning, whose verbosity can be configured using this flag.
In implementation, added a new enum `IsolatedOp` to capture all the
settings related to ops requiring communication with the
host. Old `communicate` flag in both miri configs and machine
stats is replaced with a new helper function `communicate()` which
checks `isolated_op` internally.
Added a new helper function `reject_in_isolation` which can be called
by shims to reject ops according to the reject_with settings. Use miri
specific diagnostics function `report_msg` to print backtrace in the
warning. Update it to take an enum value instead of a bool, indicating
the level of diagnostics.
Updated shims related to current dir to use the new APIs. Added a new
test for current dir ops in isolation without halting machine.
