When using existing fn as module, don't claim it doesn't exist
Tweak wording of module not found in resolve, when the name exists but belongs to a non-`mod` item.
Fix#81232.
Emit smir
This adds ability to `-Zunpretty=smir` and get smir output of a Rust file, this is obliviously pretty basic compared to `mir` output but I think we could iteratively improve it, and even at this state this is useful for us.
r? ``@celinval``
Remove asmjs
Fulfills [MCP 668](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/668).
`asmjs-unknown-emscripten` does not work as-specified, and lacks essential upstream support for generating asm.js, so it should not exist at all.
More detail when expecting expression but encountering bad macro argument
On nested macro invocations where the same macro fragment changes fragment type from one to the next, point at the chain of invocations and at the macro fragment definition place, explaining that the change has occurred.
Fix#71039.
```
error: expected expression, found pattern `1 + 1`
--> $DIR/trace_faulty_macros.rs:49:37
|
LL | (let $p:pat = $e:expr) => {test!(($p,$e))};
| ------- -- this is interpreted as expression, but it is expected to be pattern
| |
| this macro fragment matcher is expression
...
LL | (($p:pat, $e:pat)) => {let $p = $e;};
| ------ ^^ expected expression
| |
| this macro fragment matcher is pattern
...
LL | test!(let x = 1+1);
| ------------------
| | |
| | this is expected to be expression
| in this macro invocation
|
= note: when forwarding a matched fragment to another macro-by-example, matchers in the second macro will see an opaque AST of the fragment type, not the underlying tokens
= note: this error originates in the macro `test` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
I find `Compilation::and_then` hard to read. This commit removes it,
simplifying the control flow in `run_compiler`, and reducing the number
of lines of code.
In particular, `list_metadata` and `process_try_link` (renamed `rlink`)
are now only called if the relevant condition is true, rather than that
condition being checked within the function.
Currently we have an inconsistency between the "input" and "no input"
cases:
- no input: `rustc --print=sysroot -Whelp` prints the lint help.
- input: `rustc --print=sysroot -Whelp a.rs` prints the sysroot.
It makes sense to print the lint help in both cases, because that's what
happens with `--help`/`-Zhelp`/`-Chelp`.
In fact, the `describe_lints` in the "input" case happens amazingly
late, after *parsing*. This is because, with plugins, lints used to be
registered much later, when the global context was created. But #117649
moved lint registration much earlier, during session construction.
So this commit moves the `describe_lints` call to a single spot for both
for both the "input" and "no input" cases, as early as possible. This is
still not as early as `--help`/`-Zhelp`/`-Chelp`, because `-Whelp` must
wait until the session is constructed.
`rustc_driver_impl::run_compiler` currently has two
`interface::run_compiler` calls: one for the "no input" case, and one
for the normal case.
This commit merges the former into the latter, which makes the control
flow easier to read and avoids some duplication.
It also makes it clearer that the "no input" case will describe lints
before printing crate info, while the normal case does it in the reverse
order. Possibly a bug?
Yes, its type is `EarlyErrorHandler`, but there is another value of that
type later on in the function called `handler` that is initialized with
`sopts.error_format`. So `default_handler` is a better name because it
clarifies that it is initialized with `ErrorOutputType::default()`.
feat: implement `DoubleEndedSearcher` for `CharArray[Ref]Searcher`
This PR implements `DoubleEndedSearcher` for both `CharArraySearcher` and `CharArrayRefSearcher`. I'm not sure whether this was just overlooked or if there is a reason for it, but since it behaves exactly like `CharSliceSearcher`, I think the implementations should be appropriate.
ignore implied bounds with placeholders
given the following code:
```rust
trait Trait {
type Ty<'a> where Self: 'a;
}
impl<T> Trait for T {
type Ty<'a> = () where Self: 'a;
}
struct Foo<T: Trait>(T)
where
for<'x> T::Ty<'x>: Sized;
```
when computing the implied bounds from `Foo<X>` we incorrectly get the bound `X: !x` from the normalization of ` for<'x> <X as Trait>::Ty::<'x>: Sized`. This is a a known bug! we shouldn't use the constraints that arise from normalization as implied bounds. See #109628.
Ignore these bounds for now. This should prevent later ICEs.
Fixes#112250Fixes#107409
new solver normalization improvements
cool beans
At the core of this PR is a `try_normalize_ty` which stops for rigid aliases by using `commit_if_ok`.
Reworks alias-relate to fully normalize both the lhs and rhs and then equate the resulting rigid (or inference) types. This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/68 by avoiding the exponential blowup. Also supersedes #116369 by only defining opaque types if the hidden type is rigid.
I removed the stability check in `EvalCtxt::evaluate_goal` due to https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/75. While I personally have opinions on how to fix it, that still requires further t-types/`@nikomatsakis` buy-in, so I removed that for now. Once we've decided on our approach there, we can revert this commit.
r? `@compiler-errors`
On resolve error of `[rest..]`, suggest `[rest @ ..]`
When writing a pattern to collect multiple entries of a slice in a single binding, it is easy to misremember or typo the appropriate syntax to do so, instead writing the experimental `X..` pattern syntax. When we encounter a resolve error because `X` isn't available, we suggest `X @ ..` as an alternative.
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `rest` in this scope
--> $DIR/range-pattern-meant-to-be-slice-rest-pattern.rs:3:13
|
LL | [1, rest..] => println!("{rest:?}"),
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `rest`, use the at operator
|
LL | [1, rest @ ..] => println!("{rest:?}"),
| +
```
Fix#88404.
Misc changes to StableMIR required to Kani use case.
First, I wanted to say that I can split this review into multiple if it makes reviewing easier. I bundled them up, since I've been testing them together (See https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/pull/51 for the set of more thorough checks).
So far, this review includes 3 commits:
1. Add more APIs and fix `Instance::body`
- Add more APIs to retrieve information about types.
- Add a few more instance resolution options. For the drop shim, we return None if the drop body is empty. Not sure it will be enough.
- Make `Instance::body()` return an Option<Body>, since not every instance might have an available body. For example, foreign instances, virtual instances, dependencies.
2. Fix a bug on MIRVisitor
- We were not iterating over all local variables due to a typo.
3. Add more SMIR internal impl and callback return value
- In cases like Kani, we will invoke the rustc_internal run command directly for now. It would be handly to be able to have a callback that can return a value.
- We also need extra methods to convert stable constructs into internal ones, so we can break down the transition into finer grain commits.
- For the internal implementation of Region, we're always returning `ReErased` for now.
document ABI compatibility
I don't think we have any central place where we document our ABI compatibility rules, so let's create one. The `fn()` pointer type seems like a good place since ABI questions can only become relevant when invoking a function through a function pointer.
This will likely need T-lang FCP.
It matches the type, and a noun makes more sense than a verb.
The `output_filenames` function still uses a profiling label named
`prepare_outputs`, but I think that makes sense as a verb and can be
left unchanged.
This commit adds warnings if a user supplies several diagnostic options
where we can only apply one of them. We explicitly warn about ignored
options here. In addition a small test for these warnings is added.
avoid exhaustive i16 test in Miri
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116301 added a test that is way too slow to be running in Miri. So let's only test a few hopefully representative cases.
bootstrap: simplify setting unstable-options for tools
Previously, we unconditionally(instead of `if path == "src/tools/clippy" || ..`) set this (to prevent recompiling tools between `x check $tool` and '` check $another_tool` executions) specifically for tools in the `x check` step. This PR relocates that logic to `fn prepare_tool_cargo`, making it step-agnostic.
Fixes#116538Fixes#117983
Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift
The main highlights this time are support for AES and SHA256 crypto intrinsics on x86_64 by lowering to inline asm.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
When writing a pattern to collect multiple entries of a slice in a
single binding, it is easy to misremember or typo the appropriate syntax
to do so, instead writing the experimental `X..` pattern syntax. When we
encounter a resolve error because `X` isn't available, we suggest
`X @ ..` as an alternative.
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `rest` in this scope
--> $DIR/range-pattern-meant-to-be-slice-rest-pattern.rs:3:13
|
LL | [1, rest..] => println!("{rest:?}"),
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `rest`, use the at operator
|
LL | [1, rest @ ..] => println!("{rest:?}"),
| +
```
Fix#88404.
