5101: Add expect -- a light-weight alternative to insta r=matklad a=matklad
This PR implements a small snapshot-testing library. Snapshot updating is done by setting an env var, or by using editor feature (which runs a test with env-var set).
Here's workflow for updating a failing test:
Here's workflow for adding a new test:
Note that colorized diffs are not implemented in this PR, but should be easy to add (we already use them in test_utils).
Main differences from insta (which is essential for rust-analyzer development, thanks @mitsuhiko!):
* self-updating tests, no need for a separate tool
* fewer features (only inline snapshots, no redactions)
* fewer deps (no yaml, no persistence)
* tighter integration with editor
* first-class snapshot object, which can be used to write test functions (as opposed to testing macros)
* trivial to tweak for rust-analyzer needs, by virtue of being a workspace member.
I think eventually we should converge to a single snapshot testing library, but I am not sure that `expect` is exactly right, so I suggest rolling with both insta and expect for some time (if folks agree that expect might be better in the first place!).
# Editor Integration Implementation
The thing I am most excited about is the ability to update a specific snapshot from the editor. I want this to be available to other snapshot-testing libraries (cc @mitsuhiko, @aaronabramov), so I want to document how this works.
The ideal UI here would be a code action (💡). Unfortunately, it seems like it is impossible to implement without some kind of persistence (if you save test failures into some kind of a database, like insta does, than you can read the database from the editor plugin). Note that it is possible to highlight error by outputing error message in rustc's format. Unfortunately, one can't use the same trick to implement a quick fix.
For this reason, expect makes use of another rust-analyzer feature -- ability to run a single test at the cursor position. This does need some expect-specific code in rust-analyzer unfortunately. Specifically, if rust-analyzer notices that the cursor is on `expect!` macro, it adds a special flag to runnable's JSON. However, given #5017 it is possible to approximate this well-enough without rust-analyzer integration. Specifically, an extension can register a special runner which checks (using regexes) if rust-anlyzer runnable covers text with specific macro invocation and do special magic in that case.
closes#3835
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
5120: Add a simple SSR subcommand to the rust-analyzer command line binary r=davidlattimore a=davidlattimore
Is adding the dependency on ra_ide_db OK? It's needed for the call to `db.local_roots()`
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
5119: Show notification while SSR is in progress r=matklad a=davidlattimore
Ideally we would (a) show progress and (b) allow cancellation, but at least now there's some indication to the user that something is happening.
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
5096: Fix handling of whitespace when applying SSR within macro expansions. r=matklad a=davidlattimore
I originally did replacement by passing in the full file text. Then as some point I thought I could do without it. Turns out calling .text() on a node coming from a macro expansion isn't a great idea, especially when you then try and use ranges from the original source to cut that text. The test I added here actually panics without the rest of this change (sorry I didn't notice sooner).
5097: Fix SSR prompt following #4919 r=matklad a=davidlattimore
Co-authored-by: David Lattimore <dml@google.com>
5126: Use more of FxHash* r=matklad a=lnicola
```
-rwxr-xr-x 1 me me 37917528 Jun 29 17:26 /home/me/.cargo/bin/rust-analyzer
-rwxr-xr-x 1 me me 37904056 Jun 29 18:14 /home/me/.cargo/bin/rust-analyzer
```
Saved 13.5 KB there :-).
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
5124: (Partially) fix handling of type params depending on type params r=matklad a=flodiebold
If the first type parameter gets inferred, that's still not handled correctly; it'll require some more refactoring: E.g. if we have `Thing<T, F=fn() -> T>` and then instantiate `Thing<_>`, that gets turned into `Thing<_, fn() -> _>` before the `_` is instantiated into a type variable -- so afterwards, we have two type variables without any connection to each other.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
If the first type parameter gets inferred, that's still not handled correctly;
it'll require some more refactoring: E.g. if we have `Thing<T, F=fn() -> T>` and
then instantiate `Thing<_>`, that gets turned into `Thing<_, fn() -> _>` before
the `_` is instantiated into a type variable -- so afterwards, we have two type
variables without any connection to each other.
