This fixes#96449, but I haven't yet been able to
make the reproducer work using `#[cfg]` attributes,
so we can't use the 'revision' infra to write a test
The previous implementation relied on sorting by `PlaceRef`.
This requires sorting by a `DefId`, which uses untracked state
(see #93315)
Fortify handing of where bounds on trait & trait alias definitions
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96664
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96665
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93803, when listing all bounds and predicates we now need to account for the possible presence of predicates on any of the generic parameters. Both bugs were hidden by the special handling of bounds at the generic parameter declaration position.
Trait alias expansion used to confuse predicates on `Self` and where predicates.
Exiting too late when listing all the bounds caused a cycle error.
Optimize switch sources representation and usage
* Avoid constructing switch sources unless necessary - switch sources are used by backward analysis with a custom switch int edge effects, but are otherwise unnecessarily computed.
* Use sparse representation of switch sources to avoid quadratic space overhead.
Some subst cleanup
Two separate things here. Both changes are useful for some refactoring I'm doing to add an "EarlyBinder" newtype. (Part of chalkification).
1) Remove `subst_spanned` and just use `subst`. It wasn't used much anyways. In practice, I think we can probably get most of the info just from the actual error message. If not, outputting logs should do the trick. (The specific line probably wouldn't help much anyways).
2) Call `.subst()` before `replace_bound_vars_with_fresh_vars` and `erase_late_bound_regions` in three places that do the opposite. I think there might have been some time in the past that the order here matter for something, but this shouldn't be the case anymore. Conceptually, it makes more sense to the of the *early bound* vars on `fn`s as "outside" the late bound vars.
Actually fix ICE from #96583
PR #96746 fixed a very similar bug, so the same logic is used in a different place.
I originally concluded that the two issues (#96583 and #96738) were identical by comparing the backtrace, but I didn't look close enough.
Warn on unused `#[doc(hidden)]` attributes on trait impl items
[Zulip conversation](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Validy.20checks.20for.20.60.23.5Bdoc.28hidden.29.5D.60).
Whether an associated item in a trait impl is shown or hidden in the documentation entirely depends on the corresponding item in the trait declaration. Rustdoc completely ignores `#[doc(hidden)]` attributes on impl items. No error or warning is emitted:
```rust
pub trait Tr { fn f(); }
pub struct Ty;
impl Tr for Ty { #[doc(hidden)] fn f() {} }
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ignored by rustdoc and currently
// no error or warning issued
```
This may lead users to the wrong belief that the attribute has an effect. In fact, several such cases are found in the standard library (I've removed all of them in this PR).
There does not seem to exist any incentive to allow this in the future either: Impl'ing a trait for a type means the type *fully* conforms to its API. Users can add `#[doc(hidden)]` to the whole impl if they want to hide the implementation or add the attribute to the corresponding associated item in the trait declaration to hide the specific item. Hiding an implementation of an associated item does not make much sense: The associated item can still be found on the trait page.
This PR emits the warn-by-default lint `unused_attribute` for this case with a future-incompat warning.
`@rustbot` label T-compiler T-rustdoc A-lint
optimize `promote_consts` by caching the results of `validate_local`
From the FIXME in the impl of `promote_consts`. Early return the `validate_local` should save some compile time.
`qualif_local` is similar to this, but requires futher changing because there are different types of qualif checks. If this PR is effective, I will do it as well.
Remove `#[rustc_deprecated]`
This removes `#[rustc_deprecated]` and introduces diagnostics to help users to the right direction (that being `#[deprecated]`). All uses of `#[rustc_deprecated]` have been converted. CI is expected to fail initially; this requires #95958, which includes converting `stdarch`.
I plan on following up in a short while (maybe a bootstrap cycle?) removing the diagnostics, as they're only intended to be short-term.
Support tool lints with the `#[expect]` attribute (RFC 2383)
This PR fixes the ICE https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94953 by making the assert for converted expectation IDs conditional.
Additionally, it moves the lint expectation check into a separate query to support rustdoc and other tools. On the way, I've also added some tests to ensure that the attribute works for Clippy and rustdoc lints.
The number of changes comes from the long test file. This may look like a monster PR, this may smell like a monster PR and this may be a monster PR, but it's a harmless monster. 🦕
---
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94953
cc: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc: `@rust-lang/rustdoc`
Switch sources are used by backward analysis with a custom switch int
edge effects, but are otherwise unnecessarily computed.
Delay the computation until we know that switch sources are indeed
required and avoid the computation otherwise.
Track if a where bound comes from a impl Trait desugar
With https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93803 `impl Trait` function arguments get desugared to hidden where bounds. However, Clippy needs to know if a bound was originally a `impl Trait` or an actual bound. This adds a field to the `WhereBoundPredicate` struct to keep track of this information during AST->HIR lowering.
r? `@cjgillot`
cc `@estebank` (as the reviewer of #93803)
With #93803 `impl Trait` function arguments get desugared to hidden
where bounds. However, Clippy needs to know if a bound was originally a
impl Trait or an actual bound. This adds a field to the
`WhereBoundPredicate` struct to keep track of this information during
HIR lowering.
Improve validator around field projections and checked bin ops
The two commits are unrelated. In both cases, these rules were already documented in MIR docs.
diagnostics: port more diagnostics to derive + add support for `Vec` fields
- Port "unconstrained opaque type" diagnostic to using the derive.
- Allow `Vec` fields in diagnostic derive - enables support for diagnostics that have multiple primary spans, or have subdiagnostics repeated at multiple locations. `Vec<..>` fields in the diagnostic derive become loops in the generated code.
- Add `create_{err,warning}` - there wasn't a way to create a diagnostic from a struct and not emit it straight away.
- Port "explicit generic args w/ impl trait" diagnostic to using the derive.
r? `````@oli-obk`````
cc `````@pvdrz`````
make Size and Align debug-printing a bit more compact
In particular in `{:#?}`-mode, these take up a lot of space, so I think this is the better alternative (even though it is a bit longer in `{:?}` mode, I think it is still more readable).
We could make it even smaller by deviating further from what the actual code looks like, e.g. via something like `Size(4 bytes)`. Not sure what people would think about that?
Cc `````@oli-obk`````
Begin fixing all the broken doctests in `compiler/`
Begins to fix#95994.
All of them pass now but 24 of them I've marked with `ignore HELP (<explanation>)` (asking for help) as I'm unsure how to get them to work / if we should leave them as they are.
There are also a few that I marked `ignore` that could maybe be made to work but seem less important.
Each `ignore` has a rough "reason" for ignoring after it parentheses, with
- `(pseudo-rust)` meaning "mostly rust-like but contains foreign syntax"
- `(illustrative)` a somewhat catchall for either a fragment of rust that doesn't stand on its own (like a lone type), or abbreviated rust with ellipses and undeclared types that would get too cluttered if made compile-worthy.
- `(not-rust)` stuff that isn't rust but benefits from the syntax highlighting, like MIR.
- `(internal)` uses `rustc_*` code which would be difficult to make work with the testing setup.
Those reason notes are a bit inconsistently applied and messy though. If that's important I can go through them again and try a more principled approach. When I run `rg '```ignore \(' .` on the repo, there look to be lots of different conventions other people have used for this sort of thing. I could try unifying them all if that would be helpful.
I'm not sure if there was a better existing way to do this but I wrote my own script to help me run all the doctests and wade through the output. If that would be useful to anyone else, I put it here: https://github.com/Elliot-Roberts/rust_doctest_fixing_tool
