Closes#7575.
I don't think the change from a contains lookup to an iteration of the HashSet in the resolver should be much of a burden as the set of methods with the same name should be relatively small.
This is a first patch towards an opt-in built-in trait world. This patch removes the restriction on built-in traits and allows such traits to be derived.
[RFC#3]
cc #13231
@nikomatsakis r?
Currently, rustc requires that a linkage be a product of 100% rlibs or 100%
dylibs. This is to satisfy the requirement that each object appear at most once
in the final output products. This is a bit limiting, and the upcoming libcore
library cannot exist as a dylib, so these rules must change.
The goal of this commit is to enable *some* use cases for mixing rlibs and
dylibs, primarily libcore's use case. It is not targeted at allowing an
exhaustive number of linkage flavors.
There is a new dependency_format module in rustc which calculates what format
each upstream library should be linked as in each output type of the current
unit of compilation. The module itself contains many gory details about what's
going on here.
cc #10729
Pre-step towards issue #12624 and others: Introduce ExprUseVisitor, remove the
moves computation. ExprUseVisitor is a visitor that walks the AST for a
function and calls a delegate to inform it where borrows, copies, and moves
occur.
In this patch, I rewrite the gather_loans visitor to use ExprUseVisitor, but in
future patches, I think we could rewrite regionck, check_loans, and possibly
other passes to use it as well. This would refactor the repeated code between
those places that tries to determine where copies/moves/etc occur.
r? @alexcrichton
Compile-fail tests for syntax extensions belong in this suite which has correct
dependencies on all artifacts rather than just the target artifacts.
Closes#13818
Similar to my recent changes to ~[T]/&[T], these changes remove the vstore abstraction and represent str types as ~(str) and &(str). The Option<uint> in ty_str is the length of the string, None if the string is dynamically sized.
moves computation. ExprUseVisitor is a visitor that walks the AST for a
function and calls a delegate to inform it where borrows, copies, and moves
occur.
In this patch, I rewrite the gather_loans visitor to use ExprUseVisitor, but in
future patches, I think we could rewrite regionck, check_loans, and possibly
other passes to use it as well. This would refactor the repeated code between
those places that tries to determine where copies/moves/etc occur.
Specifically, the method parameter cardinality mismatch or missing
method error message span now gets method itself exactly. It was the
whole expression.
Closes#9390Closes#13684Closes#13709
This patch removes the special auto-rooting for `@` from the borrow checker. With `@` moving into a library, it doesn't make sense to keep this code around anymore. It also simplifies `trans` by removing root checking from there
@nikomatsakis
Closes: #11586
Specifically, the method parameter cardinality mismatch or missing
method error message span now gets method itself exactly. It was the
whole expression.
Closes#9390Closes#13684Closes#13709
This allows the use of syntax extensions when cross-compiling (fixing #12102). It does this by encoding the target triple in the crate metadata and checking it when searching for files. Currently the crate triple must match the host triple when there is a macro_registrar_fn, it must match the target triple when linking, and can match either when only macro_rules! macros are used.
due to carelessness, this is pretty much a duplicate of https://github.com/mozilla/rust/pull/13450.
This adds the target triple to the crate metadata.
When searching for a crate the phase (link, syntax) is taken into account.
During link phase only crates matching the target triple are considered.
During syntax phase, either the target or host triple will be accepted, unless
the crate defines a macro_registrar, in which case only the host triple will
match.
This alters the borrow checker's requirements on invoking closures from
requiring an immutable borrow to requiring a unique immutable borrow. This means
that it is illegal to invoke a closure through a `&` pointer because there is no
guarantee that is not aliased. This does not mean that a closure is required to
be in a mutable location, but rather a location which can be proven to be
unique (often through a mutable pointer).
For example, the following code is unsound and is no longer allowed:
type Fn<'a> = ||:'a;
fn call(f: |Fn|) {
f(|| {
f(|| {})
});
}
fn main() {
call(|a| {
a();
});
}
There is no replacement for this pattern. For all closures which are stored in
structures, it was previously allowed to invoke the closure through `&self` but
it now requires invocation through `&mut self`.
The standard library has a good number of violations of this new rule, but the
fixes will be separated into multiple breaking change commits.
Closes#12224
This alters the borrow checker's requirements on invoking closures from
requiring an immutable borrow to requiring a unique immutable borrow. This means
that it is illegal to invoke a closure through a `&` pointer because there is no
guarantee that is not aliased. This does not mean that a closure is required to
be in a mutable location, but rather a location which can be proven to be
unique (often through a mutable pointer).
For example, the following code is unsound and is no longer allowed:
type Fn<'a> = ||:'a;
fn call(f: |Fn|) {
f(|| {
f(|| {})
});
}
fn main() {
call(|a| {
a();
});
}
There is no replacement for this pattern. For all closures which are stored in
structures, it was previously allowed to invoke the closure through `&self` but
it now requires invocation through `&mut self`.
The standard library has a good number of violations of this new rule, but the
fixes will be separated into multiple breaking change commits.
Closes#12224
[breaking-change]
When reporting "consider removing this semicolon" hint message, the
offending semicolon may come from macro call site instead of macro
itself. Using the more appropriate span makes the hint more helpful.
Closes#13428.
This gives a better NOTE error message when a privacy error is encountered with
a static method. Previously no note was emitted (due to lack of support), but
now a note is emitted indicating that the struct/enum itself is private.
Closes#13641
This gives a better NOTE error message when a privacy error is encountered with
a static method. Previously no note was emitted (due to lack of support), but
now a note is emitted indicating that the struct/enum itself is private.
Closes#13641
When reporting "consider removing this semicolon" hint message, the
offending semicolon may come from macro call site instead of macro
itself. Using the more appropriate span makes the hint more helpful.
Closes#13428.
This commit changes the way move errors are reported when some value is
captured by a PatIdent. First, we collect all of the "cannot move out
of" errors before reporting them, and those errors with the same "move
source" are reported together. If the move is caused by a PatIdent (that
binds by value), we add a note indicating where it is and suggest the
user to put `ref` if they don't want the value to move. This makes the
"cannot move out of" error in match expression nicer (though the extra
note may not feel that helpful in other places :P). For example, with
the following code snippet,
```rust
enum Foo {
Foo1(~u32, ~u32),
Foo2(~u32),
Foo3,
}
fn main() {
let f = &Foo1(~1u32, ~2u32);
match *f {
Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
Foo2(num) => (),
Foo3 => ()
}
}
```
Errors before the change:
```rust
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:11:9: 11:18 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~~~~~~~
```
After:
```rust
test.rs:9:11: 9:13 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:9 match *f {
^~
test.rs:10:14: 10:18 note: attempting to move value to here (to prevent the move, use `ref num1` or `ref mut num1` to capture value by reference)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:10:20: 10:24 note: and here (use `ref num2` or `ref mut num2`)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:11:14: 11:17 note: and here (use `ref num` or `ref mut num`)
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~
```
Close#8064
This removes the `priv` keyword from the language and removes private enum
variants as a result. The remaining use cases of private enum variants were all
updated to be a struct with one private field that is a private enum.
RFC: 0006-remove-priv
Closes#13535
This includes a change to the way lifetime names are generated. Say we
figure that `[#0, 'a, 'b]` have to be the same lifetimes, then instead
of just generating a new lifetime `'c` like before to replace them, we
would reuse `'a`. This is done so that when the lifetime name comes
from an impl, we don't give something that's completely off, and we
don't have to do much work to figure out where the name came from. For
example, for the following code snippet:
```rust
struct Baz<'x> {
bar: &'x int
}
impl<'x> Baz<'x> {
fn baz1(&self) -> &int {
self.bar
}
}
```
`[#1, 'x]` (where `#1` is BrAnon(1) and refers to lifetime of `&int`)
have to be marked the same lifetime. With the old method, we would
generate a new lifetime `'a` and suggest `fn baz1(&self) -> &'a int`
or `fn baz1<'a>(&self) -> &'a int`, both of which are wrong.
A mismatched type with more type parameters than the expected one causes
`typeck` looking up out of the bound of type parameter vector, which
leads to ICE.
Closes#13466
A mismatched type with more type parameters than the expected one causes
`typeck` looking up out of the bound of type parameter vector, which
leads to ICE.
Closes#13466
Previously, a private use statement would shadow a public use statement, all of
a sudden publicly exporting the privately used item. The correct behavior here
is to only shadow the use for the module in question, but for now it just
reverts the entire name to private so the pub use doesn't have much effect.
The behavior isn't exactly what we want, but this no longer has backwards
compatibility hazards.
Previously resolve was checking the "import resolution" for whether an import
had succeeded or not, but this was the same structure filled in by a previous
import if a name is shadowed. Instead, this alters resolve to consult the local
resolve state (as opposed to the shared one) to test whether an import succeeded
or not.
Closes#13404
Resolve is currently erroneously allowing imports through private `use`
statements in some circumstances, even across module boundaries. For example,
this code compiles successfully today:
use std::c_str;
mod test {
use c_str::CString;
}
This should not be allowed because it was explicitly decided that private `use`
statements are purely bringing local names into scope, they are not
participating further in name resolution.
As a consequence of this patch, this code, while valid today, is now invalid:
mod test {
use std::c_str;
unsafe fn foo() {
::test::c_str::CString::new(0 as *u8, false);
}
}
While plausibly acceptable, I found it to be more consistent if private imports
were only considered candidates to resolve the first component in a path, and no
others.
Closes#12612
I think that the test case from this issue has become out of date with resolve
changes in the past 9 months, and it's not entirely clear to me what the
original bug was.
Regardless, it seems like tricky resolve behavior, so tests were added to make
sure things resolved correctly and warnings were correctly reported.
Closes#7663
This commit changes the way move errors are reported when some value is
captured by a PatIdent. First, we collect all of the "cannot move out
of" errors before reporting them, and those errors with the same "move
source" are reported together. If the move is caused by a PatIdent (that
binds by value), we add a note indicating where it is and suggest the
user to put `ref` if they don't want the value to move. This makes the
"cannot move out of" error in match expression nicer (though the extra
note may not feel that helpful in other places :P). For example, with
the following code snippet,
```rust
enum Foo {
Foo1(~u32, ~u32),
Foo2(~u32),
Foo3,
}
fn main() {
let f = &Foo1(~1u32, ~2u32);
match *f {
Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
Foo2(num) => (),
Foo3 => ()
}
}
```
Errors before the change:
```rust
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:10:9: 10:25 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test.rs:11:9: 11:18 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~~~~~~~
```
After:
```rust
test.rs:9:11: 9:13 error: cannot move out of dereference of `&`-pointer
test.rs:9 match *f {
^~
test.rs:10:14: 10:18 note: attempting to move value to here (to prevent the move, you can use `ref num1` to capture value by reference)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:10:20: 10:24 note: and here (use `ref num2`)
test.rs:10 Foo1(num1, num2) => (),
^~~~
test.rs:11:14: 11:17 note: and here (use `ref num`)
test.rs:11 Foo2(num) => (),
^~~
```
Close#8064
This fixes the categorization of the upvars of procs (represented internally
as once fns) to consider usage to require a loan. In doing so, upvars are no
longer allowed to be moved out of repeatedly in loops and such.
Closes#10398Closes#12041Closes#12127
In the error message for when a private field is used, include the name of the struct, or if it's a struct-like enum variant, the names of the variant and the enum.
This fixes#13341.
In summary these are some example transitions this change makes:
'a || => ||: 'a
proc:Send() => proc():Send
The intended syntax for closures is to put the lifetime bound not at the front
but rather in the list of bounds. Currently there is no official support in the
AST for bounds that are not 'static, so this case is currently specially handled
in the parser to desugar to what the AST is expecting. Additionally, this moves
the bounds on procedures to the correct position, which is after the argument
list.
The current grammar for closures and procedures is:
procedure := 'proc' [ '<' lifetime-list '>' ] '(' arg-list ')'
[ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ]
closure := [ 'unsafe' ] ['<' lifetime-list '>' ] '|' arg-list '|'
[ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ]
lifetime-list := lifetime | lifetime ',' lifetime-list
arg-list := ident ':' type | ident ':' type ',' arg-list
bound-list := bound | bound '+' bound-list
bound := path | lifetime
This does not currently handle the << ambiguity in `Option<<'a>||>`, I am
deferring that to a later patch. Additionally, this removes the support for the
obsolete syntaxes of ~fn and &fn.
Closes#10553Closes#10767Closes#11209Closes#11210Closes#11211
This can be a frustrating error message, ideally we should print the signature mismatch, but hinting that it's a trait incompatibility helps tracking root cause. Also beefed up the testcases for this.
Ideally we would print the signature mismatch in the error helper?
rustc: move the check_loop pass earlier.
This pass is purely AST based, and by running it earlier we emit more
useful error messages, e.g. type inference fails in the case of
`let r = break;` with few constraints on `r`, but it's more useful to be told that
the `break` is outside the loop (rather than a type error) when it is.
Closes#13292.
This pass is purely AST based, and by running it earlier we emit more
useful error messages, e.g. type inference fails in the case of `let r =
break;` with few constraints on `r`, but its more useful to be told that
the `break` is outside a loop (rather than a type error) when it is.
Closes#13292.
rustc: feature-gate `concat_idents!`.
concat_idents! is not as useful as it could be, due to macros only being
allowed in limited places, and hygiene, so lets feature gate it until we
make a decision about it.
cc #13294
concat_idents! is not as useful as it could be, due to macros only being
allowed in limited places, and hygiene, so lets feature gate it until we
make a decision about it.
cc #13294
This commit tightens up the restriction on types used to index slices to require
exactly `uint` indices. Previously any integral type was accepted, but this
leads to a few subtle problems:
* 64-bit indices don't make much sense on 32-bit systems
* Signed indices for slices used as negative indexing isn't implemented
This was discussed at the recent work week, and also has some discussion on
issue #10453.
Closes#10453
This is a continuation of the work done in #13184 to make struct fields private
by default. This commit finishes RFC 4 by making all tuple structs have private
fields by default. Note that enum variants are not affected.
A tuple struct having a private field means that it cannot be matched on in a
pattern match (both refutable and irrefutable), and it also cannot have a value
specified to be constructed. Similarly to private fields, switching the type of
a private field in a tuple struct should be able to be done in a backwards
compatible way.
The one snag that I ran into which wasn't mentioned in the RFC is that this
commit also forbids taking the value of a tuple struct constructor. For example,
this code now fails to compile:
mod a {
pub struct A(int);
}
let a: fn(int) -> a::A = a::A; //~ ERROR: first field is private
Although no fields are bound in this example, it exposes implementation details
through the type itself. For this reason, taking the value of a struct
constructor with private fields is forbidden (outside the containing module).
RFC: 0004-private-fields
This removes the `attr` matcher and adds a `meta` matcher. The previous `attr`
matcher is now ambiguous because it doesn't disambiguate whether it means inner
attribute or outer attribute.
The new behavior can still be achieved by taking an argument of the form
`#[$foo:meta]` (the brackets are part of the macro pattern).
Closes#13067
Summary:
So far, we've used the term POD "Plain Old Data" to refer to types that
can be safely copied. However, this term is not consistent with the
other built-in bounds that use verbs instead. This patch renames the Pod
kind into Copy.
RFC: 0003-opt-in-builtin-traits
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: cmr
Differential Revision: http://phabricator.octayn.net/D3
The previous syntax was `Foo:Bound<trait-parameters>`, but this is a little
ambiguous because it was being parsed as `Foo: (Bound<trait-parameters)` rather
than `Foo: (Bound) <trait-parameters>`
This commit changes the syntax to `Foo<trait-parameters>: Bound` in order to be
clear where the trait parameters are going.
Closes#9265
