The `class="location"` element is an h2, either in the sidebar or in the
mobile header. Either way, it already has `font-weight: 500`, which the link
inside will inherit.
The original version of this rule was added in
9e82fc7ef9. At that time, the location header
was rendered as a paragraph with the full path:
9e82fc7ef9/src/librustdoc/html/render.rs (L2080)
Nowadays, it's rendered as a true header, with only the name of the item,
and the full path is included in a separate `fqn` header:
98ad6a5519/src/librustdoc/html/render/mod.rs (L1797)
rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.non-exhaustive { margin-bottom }`
This selector was added in 959a13d53e to target a `<div class="non-exhaustive">`. With 4edcf61479, the non-exhaustive indicator was changed to a `<details>`, and a separate selector targetting `details.non-exhaustive` was added for it, but the old selector was never removed.
Revert "Copy stage0 binaries into stage0-sysroot"
This reverts PR #101711.
The PR broke the rustc/bootstrap benchmark on rustc-perf, I believe due to the assumption that the stage0 directory exists. Fixing that by just skipping this logic might be reasonable, but I think there's a larger discussion to be had around the right behavior when we don't have a single bin/ directory (when rustc= and cargo= are specified in config.toml). I think it's potentially reasonable to put those binaries (cargo, rustc, rustfmt?) into the bin directory, but for now just want to get us back to a healthy state.
r? `@jyn514` (but would appreciate review from others as this is just a direct revert).
change AccessLevels representation
Part of RFC (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48054). This patch implements effective visibility table with basic methods and change AccessLevels table representation according to it.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Initial version of 1.64 release notes
Needs further expansion on some points, with text that will likely end up in
the blog post as well.
Also adds the release notes from 1.62.1 and 1.63, which weren't present on the
branch.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101672 (array docs - advertise how to get array from slice)
- #101781 (Extend list of targets that support dyanmic linking for llvm tools)
- #101783 (Improve handing of env vars during bootstrap process)
- #101801 (add note for `layout_of` when query depth overflows)
- #101824 (rustdoc: add test cases for turning ``[Vec<T>]`` into ``[`Vec<T>`]``)
- #101861 (Update stdarch)
- #101873 (Allow building `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` as a standalone tool)
- #101918 (rustdoc: clean up CSS for All Items and All Crates lists)
- #101934 (Continue migration of CSS themes)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Allow building `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` as a standalone tool
This PR allows building `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` as a standalone tool via `x b proc-macro-srv-cli` (I thought that `x b rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` should work, but it doesn't for some reason...). Also this PR adds a copy of `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` binary to `build/{triple}/{stage}/libexec/` when building `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv`, so that r-a can pick it up.
This is useful to make r-a (and I assume Intellij IDEA) to expand macros when using a custom, build from source toolchain.
r? ``@jyn514``
[_zulip thread_](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/How.20to.20fix.20.60UnsupportedABI.60.20for.20custom.20toolchains.3F/near/299040175)
Update stdarch
This pulls in the following changes:
- [Use simd_bitmask intrinsic in a couple of places](9f0928782b)
- [Remove simd_shuffle<n> usage in favor of simd_shuffle](3fd17e4607)
- [Remove late specifiers in __cpuid_count](f1db941633)
- Helps with #101346
- [Use mov and xchg instead of movl(q) and xchgl(q)](3049a31937)
- [Bump cfg-if dependency to 1.0](f305cc83e7)
- [Fix documentation of __m256bh and __m512bh structs](699c093a42)
r? ``@Amanieu``
add note for `layout_of` when query depth overflows
Fixes#101747
Added `try_find_layout_root` function to add a note for `layout_of` when query depth overflows. This would make the error in #101747 look like this:
```
error: queries overflow the depth limit!
|
note: Query depth increased by 66 when computing layout of `core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<alloc::boxed::Box<alloc::string::String>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>`!
--> D:\rust-backup\parallel_rust\query_depth.rs:40:1
|
40 | fn main() {
| ^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
cc ``@semicoleon``
Improve handing of env vars during bootstrap process
This CL modifies the handing of env vars during the bootstrap process in two ways:
1. Replaces '-' characters with '_' characters in target names to increase compatibility with different shells
2. Passes Stage0 snapshot compiler related env vars to early invocations of Cargo
Extend list of targets that support dyanmic linking for llvm tools
This commit adds `linux-musl` to the list of targets that support dynamic linking for the LLVM tools.
array docs - advertise how to get array from slice
On my first Rust project, I spent more time than I care to admit figuring out how to efficiently get an array from a slice. Update the array documentation to explain this a bit more clearly.
(As a side note, it's a bit unfortunate that get-array-from-slice is only available via trait since that means it can't be used from const functions yet.)
This selector was added in 959a13d53e to
target a `<div class="non-exhaustive">`. With
4edcf61479, the non-exhaustive indicator was
changed to a `<details>`, and a separate selector targetting
`details.non-exhaustive` was added for it, but the old selector was never
removed.
Fix add reference action on macros.
Before we were using the range of the corresponding expression node in the macro expanded file, which is obviously incorrect as we are setting the text in the original source.
For some reason, the test I added is failing and I haven't found a way to fix it. Does anyone know why `check_fix` wouldn't work with macros? Getting this error:
```text
thread 'handlers::type_mismatch::tests::test_add_reference_to_macro_call' panicked at 'no diagnostics', crates/ide-diagnostics/src/handlers/type_mismatch.rs:317:9
```
closes#13219
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #93628 (Stabilize `let else`)
- #98441 (Implement simd_as for pointers)
- #101790 (Do not suggest a placeholder to const and static without a type)
- #101807 (Disallow defaults on type GATs)
- #101915 (doc: fix redirected link in `/index.html`)
- #101931 (doc: Fix a typo in `Rc::make_mut` docstring)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Implement simd_as for pointers
Expands `simd_as` (and `simd_cast`) to handle pointer-to-pointer, pointer-to-integer, and integer-to-pointer conversions.
cc ``@programmerjake`` ``@thomcc``
Add `#[allow(unused)]` to test in `cargo dev new_lint`
`rustfix` tests don't automatically apply `-Aunused` which leads to some tests having `_workarounds`, add it to new test files automatically so people don't have to worry about it
changelog: none
Pass --cfg=bootstrap for rustdoc for proc_macro crates
This PR does three things:
* First, it passes --cfg=bootstrap on stage 0 for rustdoc invocations on proc_macro crates. This mirrors what we do already for rustc invocations of those, and is needed because cargo doesn't respect RUSTFLAGS or RUSTDOCFLAGS when confronted with a proc macro.
* Second, it marks the bootstrap config variable as expected. This is needed both on later stages where it's not set, but also on stage 0, where it is set.
* Third, it adjusts the comment in the rustc wrapper to better reflect the reason why we set the bootstrap variable as
expected: due to recent changes, setting it as expected
is also required even if the cfg variable is passed: ebf4cc361e .
