[`single_match`, `single_match_else`] fix suggestion when match irrefutable
fixes#13012
changelog:[`single_match`, `single_match_else`]: fix suggestion when `match` irrefutable
Add new lint `manual_is_power_of_two`
Suggest using `is_power_of_two()` instead of the manual implementations for some basic cases
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12894
----
changelog: new [`manual_is_power_of_two`] lint
Correct version of `too_long_first_doc_paragraph`
`too_long_first_doc_paragraph` is, empirically, not in the Rust 1.81.0 release.
changelog: [`too_long_first_doc_paragraph`]: correct Rust version number in documentation.
Changelog for Clippy 1.81 🔰
Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Expectations are stable,
And reasons are set
---
### The cat of this release is *Keepy* submitted by `@blyxyas:`
<img height=500 src="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/assets/73757586/902dd802-5ac8-471e-bb93-e195526ba580" alt="The cats of this Clippy release" />
Cats for the next release can be nominated in the comments :D
---
changelog: none
move `manual_c_str_literals` to complexity
IMO the suggestion to use `c""` literals over a hardcoded `\0` byte string literal has some fairly strong upsides (no need to manually null-terminate it and the compiler checks for intermediary null bytes) that this should just be enabled by default.
It's also written slightly conservatively to only emit a warning when we can be reasonably confident that the lint is *actually* applicable (that is, lint on e.g. `b"foo\0".as_ptr()` but not `b"foo\0"`. The latter looks like a c-string but its type is `&[u8; _]`, and if it's used in a context where a byte slice is needed then you have no nice way to convert to it from a `c"foo"` literal of type `&CStr`).
changelog: move [`manual_c_str_literals`] to complexity (now warn-by-default)
Extend `implicit_saturating_sub` lint
Fixes#10070.
It can serve as base if we want to add equivalent checks for other arithmetic operations.
Also one important note: when writing this lint, I realized that I could check for wrong conditions performed beforehand on subtraction and added another part in the lint. Considering they both rely on the same checks, I kept both in the same place. Not sure if it makes sense though...
changelog: Extend `implicit_saturating_sub` lint
Use `is_diagnostic_item` for checking a def_id in `unnecessary_min_or_max`.
close#13191
This PR fixes the false positives in `unnecessary_min_or_max `.
We should use `is_diagnostic_item` for checking def_ids in this lint.
----
changelog: fix false positive in `unnecessary_min_or_max `.
Add new lint: `used_underscore_items`
Closes#13260
---
changelog: new [`used_underscore_items`] lint against using items with a single leading underscore
Fix manual_range_patterns case with one element at OR
Close#11825
As mentioned #11825 `OR` can be used for stylistic purposes with one element, we can filter this case from triggering lint
changelog: [`manual_range_patterns`]: not trigger when `OR` has only one element
check std::panic::panic_any in panic lint
close#13292
This PR detects `std::panic::panic_any` in panic lint.
changelog: check std::panic::panic_any in panic lint
Rewrite `empty_line_after_doc_comments` and `empty_line_after_outer_attr`, move them from `nursery` to `suspicious`
changelog: [`empty_line_after_doc_comments`], [`empty_line_after_outer_attr`]: rewrite and move them from `nursery` to `suspicious`
They now lint when there's a comment between the last attr/doc comment and the empty line, to cover the case:
```rust
/// Docs for `old_code
// fn old_code() {}
fn new_code() {}
```
When these lints or `suspicious_doc_comments` trigger we no longer trigger any other doc lint as a broad fix for #12917, reverts some of #13002 as the empty line lints cover it
I ended up not doing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12917#issuecomment-2161828859 as I don't think it's needed
Ignore underscore-prefixed args for needless_pass_by_value lint
When a user explicitly tags a param as unused (yet?), there is no need to raise another lint on it.
fixes#7295
Note that I had to rename all `_*` params in the tests, but kept the variable name length to avoid extra changes in the expected output.
changelog: [`needless_pass_by_value`]: do not warn if the argument name starts with an `_`
Diverging subexpression lint should not fire on todo!()
As per #10243 it is not that helpful to point out that a subexpression diverges, so do not fire on todo
changelog: [`diverging_sub_expression`]: do not trigger on todo
Fix confusing message in double_must_use lint
Close#13003
As mentioned at #13003 it isn't quite clear what it means "an empty `#[must_use]` attribute" so clarify it
changelog: [none]
Trigger [`string_slice`] if expression is reference to `&str`
Close#12708
changelog: [`string_slice`]: trigger lint if expression is reference to `&str`
fix false positive in explicit_iter_loop with msrv
close#13184
This PR fix false positive in explicit_iter_loop when msrv < 1.80
changelog: fix false positive in explicit_iter_loop when msrv < 1.80
Remove `find_format_arg_expr` AST fallback
If the function fails where it shouldn't we can fix that directly, but the fallback path is untested as I'm not aware of a case where it would fail
changelog: none
Disable assigning_clones for tests
Close: #12752
As mentioned at #12752 when a test struct is initialized with some default string, this inverts the order of assignee/assignment and makes a bit harder to read/write code
changelog: [`assigning_clones.rs`]: disable assigning_clones for tests
Clarify suggestion message for unwrap lint
Close#10217
As mentioned at #10217 message for `unwrap` uses `..` like `Some(..)` which can confuse with slice and other places mostly use `<item>` like `for (i, <item>) in target_groups_json.iter().enumerate().skip(1) {` So replace `..` to `<item>`
changelog: [`unnecessary_unwrap`] clarify suggestion message
fix code blocks in doc comments inconsistently using 3 or 4 spaces of indentation
The metadata collector script was treating the space lines all start with as indentation. This caused code block's triple backticks to get a space in front of it, like this:
```
```rust
^ this space
```
Code after that that is indented with 4 spaces will only have 3 of those rendered.
Example (taken from [here](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/missing_panics_doc)):
```rust
...
pub fn divide_by(x: i32, y: i32) -> i32 {
if y == 0 { // 3 spaces
panic!("Cannot divide by 0") // 7 spaces
...
```
Also added 'compile_fail' alongside the other rustdoc directives (second code block [here](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/macro_metavars_in_unsafe) had no highlighting), fixed a doc comment using 'rs' instead of 'rust' and removed some spaces causing an extra missing space of indentation (see second code block [here](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/map_err_ignore)).
changelog: none
Replace `rustc_semver` with `rustc_session::RustcVersion`
Allows dropping a dependency but there is a behaviour change here, the following versions are no longer accepted:
* `1` (would need to be `1.0` or `1.0.0`)
* `1.0.0-alpha`
* `1.0.0-alpha.2`
* `1.0.0-beta`
But this seems unlikely to effect anybody, I did some GitHub searching and found no occurrences outside our UI tests
r? `@flip1995`
changelog: none
Fix case where doc_markdown is triggered on words ending with "ified"
Fixes#13097.
r? `@Alexendoo`
changelog: Fix case where doc_markdown is triggered on words ending with "ified"
[`macro_metavars_in_unsafe`]: recognize metavariables in tail expressions
Fixes#13219
`macro_metavars_in_unsafe` keeps track of the current "expansion depth" (incremented/decremented when entering/leaving a macro span) to tell if an expression from the root context is contained within a macro (see the doc comment I added for a hopefully better explanation)
Before this PR, we didn't increment said `expn_depth` for `unsafe` blocks within macros, because we already do that in `visit_stmt` anyway, so it would work fine for statements, but that's not enough for tail expressions of an unsafe block.
So we now also increment it for macro unsafe blocks.
Also updated the comment for `expn_depth` while I'm at it because "This is not necessary for correctness" isn't correct now that I think about it
------
changelog: none
