Check method input expressions once
If the user mistakenly forgets to wrap their method args in a tuple, then the compiler tries to check that types within the tuple match the expression args. This means we call `check_expr` once within this diagnostic code, so when we check the expr once again in `demand_compatible`, we attempt to apply expr adjustments twice, leading to ICEs.
This PR attempts to fix this by skipping the expression type check in `demand_compatible` if we have detected an method arg mismatch at all.
This does lead to a single UI test regressing slightly, due to a diagnostic disappearing, though I don't know if it is generally meaningful to even raise an type error after noting that the argument count is incorrect in a function call, since the user might be providing (in-context) meaningless expressions to the wrong method.
I can adjust this to be a bit more targeted (to just skip checking exprs in `demand_compatible` in the tuple case) if this UI test regression is a problem.
fixes#94334
cc #94291
Also drive-by fixup of `.node_type(expr.hir_id)` to `.expr_ty(expr)`, since that method exists.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91545 (Generalize "remove `&`" and "add `*`" suggestions to more than one deref)
- #93385 (Rustdoc ty consistency fixes)
- #93926 (Lint against more useless `#[must_use]` attributes)
- #94094 (use BOOL for TCP_NODELAY setsockopt value on Windows)
- #94384 (Add Atomic*::from_mut_slice)
- #94448 (5 - Make more use of `let_chains`)
- #94452 (Sync portable-simd for bitmasks &c.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sync portable-simd for bitmasks &c.
In the ideal case, where everything works easily and nothing has to be rearranged, it is as simple as:
- `git subtree pull -P library/portable-simd https://github.com/rust-lang/portable-simd - ${branch}`
- write the commit message
- `python x.py test --stage 1` to make sure it runs
- `git push` to your PR-to-rustc branch
If anything borks up this flow, you can fix it with sufficient git wizardry but you are usually better off going back to the source, fixing it, and starting over, before you open the PR.
r? `@calebzulawski`
Add Atomic*::from_mut_slice
Tracking issue #76314 for `from_mut` has a question about the possibility of `from_mut_slice`, and I found a real case for it. A user in the forum had a parallelism problem that could be solved by open-indexing updates to a vector of atomics, but they didn't want to affect the other code using that vector. Using `from_mut_slice`, they could borrow that data as atomics just long enough for their parallel loop.
ref: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/sharing-vector-with-rayon-par-iter-correctly/72022
use BOOL for TCP_NODELAY setsockopt value on Windows
This issue was found by the Wine project and mitigated there [^1].
Windows' setsockopt expects a BOOL (a typedef for int) for TCP_NODELAY
[^2]. Windows itself is forgiving and will accept any positive optlen and
interpret the first byte of *optval as the value, so this bug does not
affect Windows itself, but does affect systems implementing Windows'
interface more strictly, such as Wine. Wine was previously passing this
through to the host's setsockopt, where, e.g., Linux requires that
optlen be correct for the chosen option, and TCP_NODELAY expects an int.
[^1]: d6ea38f32d
[^2]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winsock/nf-winsock-setsockopt
Lint against more useless `#[must_use]` attributes
This expands the existing `#[must_use]` check in `unused_attributes` to lint against pretty much everything `#[must_use]` doesn't support.
Fixes#93906.
Generalize "remove `&`" and "add `*`" suggestions to more than one deref
Suggest removing more than one `&` and `&mut`, along with suggesting adding more than one `*` (or a combination of the two).
r? `@estebank`
(since you're experienced with these types of suggestions, feel free to reassign)
If they are trying to use features rustc doesn't yet know about,
request a feature request.
Additionally, also warn against using feature names without leading `+`
or `-` signs.
Caching the stable hash of Ty within itself
Instead of computing stable hashes on types as needed, we compute it during interning.
This way we can, when a hash is requested, just hash that hash, which is significantly faster than traversing the type itself.
We only do this for incremental for now, as incremental is the only frequent user of stable hashing.
As a next step we can try out
* moving the hash and TypeFlags to Interner, so projections and regions get the same benefit (tho regions are not nested, so maybe that's not a good idea? Would be nice for dedup tho)
* start comparing types via their stable hash instead of their address?
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #92399 (fix typo in btree/vec doc: Self -> self)
- #92823 (Tweak diagnostics)
- #94248 (Fix ICE when passing block to while-loop condition)
- #94414 (Fix ICE when using Box<T, A> with large A)
- #94445 (4 - Make more use of `let_chains`)
- #94449 (Add long explanation for E0726)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The `PrettyPrinter` changes formatting of array size and integer
constants based on `-Zverbose`, so its implementation cannot be used in
legacy symbol mangling.
Fix ICE when passing block to while-loop condition
We were incorrectly delaying a bug when we passed _any_ block (that evaluated to `()`) to a while loop. This PR makes the check a bit more sophisticated.
We should only suppress the error here in cases that are equivalent to those we find in #93574 (i.e. only while loop conditions that have destructuring assignment expressions in them).
Fixes#93997
cc `@estebank` who added this code
I would not be opposed to removing the delay-bug altogether, and just emitting this error always. I much prefer duplicate errors over no errors.
Tweak diagnostics
* Recover from invalid `'label: ` before block.
* Make suggestion to enclose statements in a block multipart.
* Point at `match`, `while`, `loop` and `unsafe` keywords when failing
to parse their expression. (Fix #92705.)
* Do not suggest `{ ; }`.
* Do not suggest `|` when very unlikely to be what was wanted (in `let`
statements).
fix typo in btree/vec doc: Self -> self
this pr fixes#92345
the documentation refers to the object the method is called for, not the type, so it should be using the lower case self.
* Recover from invalid `'label: ` before block.
* Make suggestion to enclose statements in a block multipart.
* Point at `match`, `while`, `loop` and `unsafe` keywords when failing
to parse their expression.
* Do not suggest `{ ; }`.
* Do not suggest `|` when very unlikely to be what was wanted (in `let`
statements).
Only create a single expansion for each inline integration.
The inlining integrator used to create one expansion for each span from the callee body.
This PR reverses the logic to create a single expansion for the whole call,
which is more consistent with how macro expansions work for macros.
This should remove the large memory regression in #91743.
Apply noundef metadata to loads of types that do not permit raw init
This matches the noundef attributes we apply on arguments/return types.
Fixes (partially) #74378.
This was necessary before, because `declare_raw_fn` would always apply
the default optimization attributes to every declared function,
and then `attributes::from_fn_attrs` would have to remove the default
attributes in the case of, e.g. `#[optimize(speed)]` in a `-Os` build.
However, every relevant callsite of `declare_raw_fn` (i.e. where we
actually generate code for the function, and not e.g. a call to an
intrinsic, where optimization attributes don't [?] matter)
calls `from_fn_attrs`, so we can simply remove the attribute setting
from `declare_raw_fn`, and rely on `from_fn_attrs` to apply the correct
attributes all at once.
