Fix link to rustc guide in README.md
This is a follow-up to #48479 and fixes a minor bug with the link to the rustc guide in the README.
r? @nikomatsakis
cc @mark-i-m
Stabilize LocalKey::try_with
The `LocalKey::try_with` method is now stabilized.
`LocalKey::state` and `LocalKeyState` marked as deprecated. Although, is there any reason to keep them - should we perhaps remove them completely?
Closes#27716
r? @alexcrichton
rustc: Tweak funclet cleanups of ffi functions
This commit is targeted at addressing #48251 by specifically fixing a case where
a longjmp over Rust frames on MSVC runs cleanups, accidentally running the
"abort the program" cleanup as well. Added in #46833 `extern` ABI functions in
Rust will abort the process if Rust panics, and currently this is modeled as a
normal cleanup like all other destructors.
Unfortunately it turns out that `longjmp` on MSVC is implemented with SEH, the
same mechanism used to implement panics in Rust. This means that `longjmp` over
Rust frames will run Rust cleanups (even though we don't necessarily want it
to). Notably this means that if you `longjmp` over a Rust stack frame then that
probably means you'll abort the program because one of the cleanups will abort
the process.
After some discussion on IRC it turns out that `longjmp` doesn't run cleanups
for *caught* exceptions, it only runs cleanups for cleanup pads. Using this
information this commit tweaks the codegen for an `extern` function to
a catch-all clause for exceptions instead of a cleanup block. This catch-all is
equivalent to the C++ code:
try {
foo();
} catch (...) {
bar();
}
and in fact our codegen here is designed to match exactly what clang emits for
that C++ code!
With this tweak a longjmp over Rust code will no longer abort the process. A
longjmp will continue to "accidentally" run Rust cleanups (destructors) on MSVC.
Other non-MSVC platforms will not rust destructors with a longjmp, so we'll
probably still recommend "don't have destructors on the stack", but in any case
this is a more surgical fix than #48567 and should help us stick to standard
personality functions a bit longer.
Fix find_width_of_character_at_span bounds check
Commit 0bd96671f0 added bounds checking of our current target byte position to prevent infinite loops. Unfortunately it was comparing the file-relative `target` versus the global `file_start_pos` and `file_end_pos`.
The result is failing to detect multibyte characters unless their file-relative offset fit within their global offset. This causes other parts of the compiler to generate spans pointing to the middle of a
multibyte character which will ultimately panic in `bytepos_to_file_charpos`.
Fix by comparing the `target` to the total file size when moving forward and doing checked subtraction when moving backwards. This should preserve the intent of the bounds check while removing the offset confusion.
cc @davidtwco
Fixes#48508
Support parentheses in patterns under feature gate
This is a prerequisite for any other extensions to pattern syntax - `|` with multiple patterns, type ascription, `..PAT` in slice patterns.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/554
These changes were meant to be in
2b18d8fe9dc05415a8e6b7cadf879c7f7ebe020a (rebased from
12a230562ece9b0d29018a436676141054dc53b7), but I messed up the rebase a
bit as the file had been moved.
This should not be needed: the new variable will be related to the old
ones, so if they are constrained, so is the new variable; if they are
not, and hence default to diverging, so will the new variable.
[Underspecified semantics] Type check defaults at declaration.
Fixes #46669. See the test for code that compiles on stable but will no longer compile. This falls under a "Underspecified language semantics" fix. **Needs crater**.
On type and trait declarations, we currently allow anything that name checks as a type parameter default. That allows the user to write a default that can never be applied, or even a default that may conditionally be applied depending on the type of another parameter. Mostly this just defers the error to use sites, but also allows clever hacks such as `Foo<T, U = <T as Iterator>::Item>` where `U` will be able to apply it's default only when `T: Iterator`. Maybe that means this bug is a feature, but it's a fiddly behaviour that seems undesirable.
This PR validates defaults at declaration sites by ensuring all predicates on the parameter are valid for the default. With the exception of `Self: Sized` which we don't want to check to allow things like `trait Add<RHS = Self>`.
This commit is targeted at addressing #48251 by specifically fixing a case where
a longjmp over Rust frames on MSVC runs cleanups, accidentally running the
"abort the program" cleanup as well. Added in #46833 `extern` ABI functions in
Rust will abort the process if Rust panics, and currently this is modeled as a
normal cleanup like all other destructors.
Unfortunately it turns out that `longjmp` on MSVC is implemented with SEH, the
same mechanism used to implement panics in Rust. This means that `longjmp` over
Rust frames will run Rust cleanups (even though we don't necessarily want it
to). Notably this means that if you `longjmp` over a Rust stack frame then that
probably means you'll abort the program because one of the cleanups will abort
the process.
After some discussion on IRC it turns out that `longjmp` doesn't run cleanups
for *caught* exceptions, it only runs cleanups for cleanup pads. Using this
information this commit tweaks the codegen for an `extern` function to
a catch-all clause for exceptions instead of a cleanup block. This catch-all is
equivalent to the C++ code:
try {
foo();
} catch (...) {
bar();
}
and in fact our codegen here is designed to match exactly what clang emits for
that C++ code!
With this tweak a longjmp over Rust code will no longer abort the process. A
longjmp will continue to "accidentally" run Rust cleanups (destructors) on MSVC.
Other non-MSVC platforms will not rust destructors with a longjmp, so we'll
probably still recommend "don't have destructors on the stack", but in any case
this is a more surgical fix than #48567 and should help us stick to standard
personality functions a bit longer.
