Correct documentation for `Rvalue::ShallowInitBox`
As a part of the big MIR docs PR, I had added a comment indicating that `Rvalue::ShallowInitBox` is disallowed after drop elaboration, but this is not true (no idea why I thought it was). Codegen has support for it, and trying to enforce this rule in the validator causes compiling core to ICE on the very first `box` statement.
That being said, this `Rvalue` probably *should* be banned after drop elaboration - it doesn't seem like it's still useful for much. However, I do not have time right now to actually go investigate how difficult a change that is to make, so in the meantime fixing the docs to reflect the current situation seems like the right step.
r? rust-lang/mir-opt
simplify `describe_field` func in borrowck's diagnostics part
This PR simplify the `describe_field` func in borrowck's diagnostics part, besides fix the FIXME in it.
Suggest calling method on nested field when struct is missing method
Similar to the suggestion to change `x.field` to `x.nested.field`, implement a similar suggestion for when `x.method()` should be replaced with `x.nested.method()`.
Fix codegen bug in "ptx-kernel" abi related to arg passing
I found a codegen bug in the nvptx abi related to that args are passed as ptrs ([see comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38788#issuecomment-1048999928)), this is not as specified in the [ptx-interoperability doc](https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/ptx-writers-guide-to-interoperability/) or how C/C++ does it. It will also almost always fail in practice since device/host uses different memory spaces for most hardware.
This PR fixes the bug and add tests for passing structs to ptx kernels.
I observed that all nvptx assembly tests had been marked as [ignore a long time ago](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59752#issuecomment-501713428). I'm not sure if the new one should be marked as ignore, it passed on my computer but it might fail if ptx-linker is missing on the server? I guess this is outside scope for this PR and should be looked at in a different issue/PR.
I only fixed the nvptx64-nvidia-cuda target and not the potential code paths for the non-existing 32bit target. Even though 32bit nvptx is not a supported target there are still some code under the hood supporting codegen for 32 bit ptx. I was advised to create an MCP to find out if this code should be removed or updated.
Perhaps ``@RDambrosio016`` would have interest in taking a quick look at this.
Clarify that `Cow::into_owned` returns owned data
Two sections of the `Cow::into_owned` docs imply that `into_owned` returns a `Cow`. Clarify that it returns the underlying owned object, either cloned or extracted from the `Cow`.
Fix incorrect suggestion for trait bounds involving binary operators
This PR fixes#93927, #92347, #93744 by replacing the bespoke trait-suggestion logic in `op.rs` with a more common code path.
The downside is that this fix causes some suggestions to not include an `Output=` type, reducing their usefulness.
Note that this causes one case in the `missing-bounds.rs` test to fail rustfix. So I would need to move that code into a separate non-fix test if this PR is otherwise acceptable.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #90312 (Fix some confusing wording and improve slice-search-related docs)
- #96149 (Remove unused macro rules)
- #96279 (rustdoc: Remove .woff font files)
- #96355 (Better handle too many `#` recovery in raw str)
- #96379 (delay bug when adjusting `NeverToAny` twice during diagnostic code)
- #96384 (do not consider two extern types to be similar)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
delay bug when adjusting `NeverToAny` twice during diagnostic code
Addresses Issue 96335 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96335) by using `delay_span_bug` instead of an assert and returning an error type from `check_expr_meets_expectation_or_error`.
Fixes#96335
Better handle too many `#` recovery in raw str
Point at all the unnecessary trailing `#`.
Better handle interaction with outer attributes when `;` is missing.
Fix#95030.
rustdoc: Remove .woff font files
Copying `@jsha's` great comment:
> Right now we ship 1.5MB of woff files in the rustdoc binary, and 1MB of woff2 files, for a total of 2.5MB.
>
> Per:
>
> https://caniuse.com/woff
> https://caniuse.com/woff2
>
> The only listed browser that supports woff and not woff2 is IE, which is not supported per https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1985-tiered-browser-support.md.
>
> I propose we stop shipping woff files and save 1.5MB from the rustdoc binary (and from each doc build).
r? `@jsha`
Fix some confusing wording and improve slice-search-related docs
This adds more links between `contains` and `binary_search` because I do think they have some relevant connections. If your (big) slice happens to be sorted and you know it, surely you should be using `[3; 100].binary_search(&5).is_ok()` over `[3; 100].contains(&5)`?
This also fixes the confusing "searches this sorted X" wording which just sounds really weird because it doesn't know whether it's actually sorted. It should be but it may not be. The new wording should make it clearer that you will probably want to sort it and in the same sentence it also mentions the related function `contains`.
Similarly, this mentions `binary_search` on `contains`' docs.
This also fixes some other minor stuff and inconsistencies.
Display function path in unsafety violations - E0133
adds `DefId` to `UnsafetyViolationDetails`
this enables consumers to access the function definition that was reported to be unsafe and also changes the output for some E0133 diagnostics
Generate synthetic object file to ensure all exported and used symbols participate in the linking
Fix#50007 and #47384
This is the synthetic object file approach that I described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95363#issuecomment-1079932354, allowing all exported and used symbols to be linked while still allowing them to be GCed.
Related #93791, #95363
r? `@petrochenkov`
cc `@carbotaniuman`
