Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113657 (Expand, rename and improve `incorrect_fn_null_checks` lint)
- #114237 (parser: more friendly hints for handling `async move` in the 2015 edition)
- #114300 (Suggests turbofish in patterns)
- #114372 (const validation: point at where we found a pointer but expected an integer)
- #114395 ([rustc_span][perf] Hoist lookup sorted by words out of the loop.)
- #114403 (fix the span in the suggestion of remove question mark)
- #114408 (Temporary remove myself from review rotation)
- #114415 (Skip checking of `rustc_codegen_gcc` with vendoring enabled)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Update cargo (CVE-2023-38497 fix included)
2 commits in 020651c52257052d28f6fd83fbecf5cfa1ed516c..d78bbf4bde3c6b95caca7512f537c6f9721426ff
2023-08-02 16:00:37 +0000 to 2023-08-03 12:58:25 +0000
- Fix CVE-2023-38497 for master (rust-lang/cargo#12443)
- Don't attempt to read a token from stdin if a cmdline token is provided (rust-lang/cargo#12440)
r? `@ghost`
Skip checking of `rustc_codegen_gcc` with vendoring enabled
`rustc_codegen_gcc` currently cannot be vendored, which [breaks](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112393) `x.py check` with vendoring enabled. Until the vendoring issue is resolved, it would be nice if `x.py check` could succeed (and just skip `gcc`) with `vendor = true`. With this PR, it does.
Related issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112393
r? bootstrap
Temporary remove myself from review rotation
I'm going on vacation from 7-th to 15-th and won't be reviewing PRs or writing code.
Feel free to still ping me if you want, I'll read everything when I'm back, but most likely not sooner =)
const validation: point at where we found a pointer but expected an integer
Instead of validation just printing "unable to turn pointer into bytes", make this a regular validation error that says where in the value the bad pointer was found. Also distinguish "expected integer, got pointer" from "expected pointer, got partial pointer or mix of pointers".
To avoid duplicating things too much I refactored the diagnostics for validity a bit, so that "got uninit, expected X" and "got pointer, expected X" can share the "X" part. Also all the errors emitted for validation are now grouped under `const_eval_validation` so that they are in a single group in the ftl file.
r? `@oli-obk`
parser: more friendly hints for handling `async move` in the 2015 edition
Fixes#114219
An error is emitted when encountering an async move block in the 2015 edition.
Another appropriate location to raise an error is after executing [let path = this.parse_path(PathStyle::Expr)?](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/stmt.rs#L152), but it seems somewhat premature to invoke `create_err` at that stage.
Expand, rename and improve `incorrect_fn_null_checks` lint
This PR,
- firstly, expand the lint by now linting on references
- secondly, it renames the lint `incorrect_fn_null_checks` -> `useless_ptr_null_checks`
- and thirdly it improves the lint by catching `ptr::from_mut`, `ptr::from_ref`, as well as `<*mut _>::cast` and `<*const _>::cast_mut`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113601
cc ```@est31```
Infer type in irrefutable slice patterns with fixed length as array
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76342
In irrefutable slice patterns with a fixed length, we can infer the type as an array type. We now choose to prefer some implementations over others, e.g. in:
```
struct Zeroes;
const ARR: [usize; 2] = [0; 2];
const ARR2: [usize; 2] = [2; 2];
impl Into<&'static [usize; 2]> for Zeroes {
fn into(self) -> &'static [usize; 2] {
&ARR
}
}
impl Into<&'static [usize]> for Zeroes {
fn into(self) -> &'static [usize] {
&ARR2
}
}
fn main() {
let &[a, b] = Zeroes.into();
}
```
We now prefer the impl candidate `impl Into<&'static [usize; 2]> for Zeroes`, it's not entirely clear to me that this is correct, but given that the slice impl would require a type annotation anyway, this doesn't seem unreasonable.
r? `@lcnr`
Fix suggestion spans for expr from macro expansions
### Issue #112007: rustc shows expanded `writeln!` macro in code suggestion
#### Before This PR
```
help: consider using a semicolon here
|
6 | };
| +
help: you might have meant to return this value
--> C:\Users\hayle\.rustup\toolchains\nightly-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\lib/rustlib/src/rust\library\core\src\macros\mod.rs:557:9
|
55| return $dst.write_fmt($crate::format_args_nl!($($arg)*));
| ++++++ +
```
#### After This PR
```
help: consider using a semicolon here
|
LL | };
| +
help: you might have meant to return this value
|
LL | return writeln!(w, "but not here");
| ++++++ +
```
### Issue #110017: `format!` `.into()` suggestion deletes the `format` macro
#### Before This PR
```
help: call `Into::into` on this expression to convert `String` into `Box<dyn std::error::Error>`
--> /Users/eric/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-aarch64-apple-darwin/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/alloc/src/macros.rs:121:12
|
12| res.into()
| +++++++
```
#### After This PR
```
help: call `Into::into` on this expression to convert `String` into `Box<dyn std::error::Error>`
|
LL | Err(format!("error: {x}").into())
| +++++++
```
---
Fixes#112007.
Fixes#110017.
Miscellaneous HIR typeck nits
Remove some check functions that only have one usage
Also remove `Expectation::IsLast`, which was both undocumented, and was also made redundant by my cleanup/fix in #103987😸
Temporarily eholk from review rotation
I'm going to be out for the rest of this week and then all of next week, and I generally haven't had the bandwidth to do much in the way of reviewing lately anyway. I'm going to remove myself for the review queue at least until I'm back from vacation and have some time to get a few other things in better shape.
r? `@wesleywiser`
Clarify documentation for `CStr`
* Better differentiate summaries for `from_bytes_until_nul` and `from_bytes_with_nul`
* Add some links where they may be helpful
Suggest `x build library` for a custom toolchain that fails to load `core`
Fixes#113222
The nicer suggestion for dev-channel won't be emitted if `-Z ui-testing` enabled. IMO, this is acceptable for now.
It's the same as `Delimiter`, minus the `Invisible` variant. I'm
generally in favour of using types to make impossible states
unrepresentable, but this one feels very low-value, and the conversions
between the two types are annoying and confusing.
Look at the change in `src/tools/rustfmt/src/expr.rs` for an example:
the old code converted from `MacDelimiter` to `Delimiter` and back
again, for no good reason. This suggests the author was confused about
the types.
Revert #113588 to fix bootstrap timings
This reverts #113588 which seems to have broken perf's bootstrap timings via some git issue
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114318#issuecomment-1660807886 show a newly broken benchmark, the error at the time was
```
fatal: Path 'src/ci/channel' exists on disk, but not in 'e62323df22ecf9c163023132d17b7114f68b72e8'.
thread 'main' panicked at 'command did not execute successfully: cd "/home/collector/rustc-perf/rust" && "git" "show" "e62323df22ecf9c163023132d17b7114f68b72e8:src/ci/channel"
expected success, got: exit status: 128', config.rs:1786:27
```
If this lands, it will reopen#101907 and annoy miri, but it could actually be an issue that would appear during the next bootstrap bump, not just rustc-perf today.
r? `@ghost`
Remove `constness` from `TraitPredicate`
Any ICEs or compiler errors created by this PR are expected and intended to be fixed in the future.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc #110395
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #114079 (Use `upvar_tys` in more places, make it return a list)
- #114166 (Add regression test for resolving `--extern libc=test.rlib`)
- #114321 (get auto traits for parallel rustc)
- #114335 (fix and extend ptr_comparison test)
- #114347 (x.py print more detailed format files and untracked files count)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
