Fixes#77215
As mentioned in #77215, the current CONTRIBUTING.md links to the rustc-dev-guide.
Even though the rustc-dev-guide has lots of useful information for contributors,
one is already confused by reading the first line of the current CONTRIBUTING.md.
> To get started, read the [Getting Started] guide in the [rustc-dev-guide].
This line tells the contributor to go and read the rustc-dev-guide. What is
the rustc-dev-guide? What does rustc even mean? These are some of the
questions that went into my head when reading this line as a first time
contributor. By explaining what the rustc-dev-guide is and some platforms
to get help, a new contributor understands what the first step is and the process
is much clearer. The `About the [rustc-dev-guide]` section explains what
the rustc-dev-guide is, what rustc is, and the purpose out of reading the
guide. The `Getting help` section points the user to some places where
they can get help, find a mentor, and introduce themsevles.
Change to link to "Contributing to Rust" chapter of `rustc` Dev Guide, primarily on the basis that the GitHub "first contribution" Issue "pop-up" says "Be sure to review the [contributing guidelines] and [code of conduct]" and links to this file.
When/if the guide/"Getting Started" section gets revised to not be `rustc`-specific the linked section can be changed.
In the meantime this prevents leading first time contributors into a confusing cul de sac.
Rename rustc guide
This is in preparation for https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-guide/issues/470
Needs to be merged after we actually rename the guide.
Have used this to rename:
`git grep -l 'rustc_guide' | xargs sed -i 's/rustc_guide/rustc_dev_guide/g'`
`git grep -l 'rustc-guide' | xargs sed -i 's/rustc-guide/rustc-dev-guide/g'`
`git grep -l 'rustc guide' | xargs sed -i 's/rustc guide/rustc dev guide/g'`
Mention keyword closing policy
closes#59233 / https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59233#issuecomment-478362693
rewording suggestions welcome
> Also in the referenced issue, the commit number of the new commit
> that could close that issue is not really informative. The PR number itself appeared in the issue
> is more informative and concise.
@lzutao what do you mean with that? Is this fixed by the new "May be fixed by #XXXXX"?
