Stabilize CString::from_vec_with_nul[_unchecked]
Closes the tracking issue #73179. I am keeping this in _draft_ mode until the FCP has ended.
This is my first time stabilizing a feature, so I would appreciate any guidance on things I should do differently.
Closes#73179
Remove unnecessary condition in Barrier::wait()
This is my first pull request for Rust, so feel free to call me out if anything is amiss.
After some examination, I realized that the second condition of the "spurious-wakeup-handler" loop in ``std::sync::Barrier::wait()`` should always evaluate to ``true``, making it redundant in the ``&&`` expression.
Here is the affected function before the fix:
```rust
#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
pub fn wait(&self) -> BarrierWaitResult {
let mut lock = self.lock.lock().unwrap();
let local_gen = lock.generation_id;
lock.count += 1;
if lock.count < self.num_threads {
// We need a while loop to guard against spurious wakeups.
// https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spurious_wakeup
while local_gen == lock.generation_id && lock.count < self.num_threads { // fixme
lock = self.cvar.wait(lock).unwrap();
}
BarrierWaitResult(false)
} else {
lock.count = 0;
lock.generation_id = lock.generation_id.wrapping_add(1);
self.cvar.notify_all();
BarrierWaitResult(true)
}
}
```
At first glance, it seems that the check that ``lock.count < self.num_threads`` would be necessary in order for a thread A to detect when another thread B has caused the barrier to reach its thread count, making thread B the "leader".
However, the control flow implicitly results in an invariant that makes observing ``!(lock.count < self.num_threads)``, i.e. ``lock.count >= self.num_threads`` impossible from thread A.
When thread B, which will be the leader, calls ``.wait()`` on this shared instance of the ``Barrier``, it locks the mutex in the first line and saves the ``MutexGuard`` in the ``lock`` variable. It then increments the value of ``lock.count``. However, it then proceeds to check if ``lock.count < self.num_threads``. Since it is the leader, it is the case that (after the increment of ``lock.count``), the lock count is *equal* to the number of threads. Thus, the second branch is immediately taken and ``lock.count`` is zeroed. Additionally, the generation ID is incremented (with wrap). Then, the condition variable is signalled. But, the other threads are waiting at the line ``lock = self.cvar.wait(lock).unwrap();``, so they cannot resume until thread B's call to ``Barrier::wait()`` returns, which drops the ``MutexGuard`` acquired in the first ``let`` statement and unlocks the mutex.
The order of events is thus:
1. A thread A calls `.wait()`
2. `.wait()` acquires the mutex, increments `lock.count`, and takes the first branch
3. Thread A enters the ``while`` loop since the generation ID has not changed and the count is less than the number of threads for the ``Barrier``
3. Spurious wakeups occur, but both conditions hold, so the thread A waits on the condition variable
4. This process repeats for N - 2 additional times for non-leader threads A'
5. *Meanwhile*, Thread B calls ``Barrier::wait()`` on the same barrier that threads A, A', A'', etc. are waiting on. The thread count reaches the number of threads for the ``Barrier``, so all threads should now proceed, with B being the leader. B acquires the mutex and increments the value ``lock.count`` only to find that it is not less than ``self.num_threads``. Thus, it immediately clamps ``self.num_threads`` back down to 0 and increments the generation. Then, it signals the condvar to tell the A (prime) threads that they may continue.
6. The A, A', A''... threads wake up and attempt to re-acquire the ``lock`` as per the internal operation of a condition variable. When each A has exclusive access to the mutex, it finds that ``lock.generation_id`` no longer matches ``local_generation`` **and the ``&&`` expression short-circuits -- and even if it were to evaluate it, ``self.count`` is definitely less than ``self.num_threads`` because it has been reset to ``0`` by thread B *before* B dropped its ``MutexGuard``**.
Therefore, it my understanding that it would be impossible for the non-leader threads to ever see the second boolean expression evaluate to anything other than ``true``. This PR simply removes that condition.
Any input would be appreciated. Sorry if this is terribly verbose. I'm new to the Rust community and concurrency can be hard to explain in words. Thanks!
Reject octal zeros in IPv4 addresses
This fixes#86964 by rejecting octal zeros in IP addresses, such that `192.168.00.00000000` is rejected with a parse error, since having leading zeros in front of another zero indicates it is a zero written in octal notation, which is not allowed in the strict mode specified by RFC 6943 3.1.1. Octal rejection was implemented in #83652, but due to the way it was implemented octal zeros were still allowed.
removing TLS support in x86_64-unknown-none-hermitkernel
HermitCore's kernel itself doesn't support TLS. Consequently, the entries in x86_64-unknown-none-hermitkernel should be removed. This commit should help to finalize #89062.
linux/aarch64 Now() should be actually_monotonic()
While issues have been seen on arm64 platforms the Arm architecture requires
that the counter monotonically increases and that it must provide a uniform
view of system time (e.g. it must not be possible for a core to receive a
message from another core with a time stamp and observe time going backwards
(ARM DDI 0487G.b D11.1.2). While there have been a few 64bit SoCs that have
bugs (#49281, #56940) which cause time to not monotonically increase, these have
been fixed in the Linux kernel and we shouldn't penalize all Arm SoCs for those
who refuse to update their kernels:
SUN50I_ERRATUM_UNKNOWN1 - Allwinner A64 / Pine A64 - fixed in 5.1
FSL_ERRATUM_A008585 - Freescale LS2080A/LS1043A - fixed in 4.10
HISILICON_ERRATUM_161010101 - Hisilicon 1610 - fixed in 4.11
ARM64_ERRATUM_858921 - Cortex A73 - fixed in 4.12
255a3f3e18 std: Force `Instant::now()` to be monotonic added a Mutex to work around
this problem and a small test program using glommio shows the majority of time spent
acquiring and releasing this Mutex. 3914a7b0da tries to improve this, but actually
makes it worse on big systems as for 128b atomics a ldxp/stxp pair (and successful loop)
for v8.4 systems that don't support FEAT_LSE2 is required which is expensive as a lock
and because of how the load/store-exclusives scale on large Arm systems is both unfair
to threads and tends to go backwards in performance.
A small sample program using glommio improves by 70x on a 32 core Graviton2
system with this change.
[fuchsia] Update process info struct
The fuchsia platform is in the process of softly transitioning over to
using a new value for ZX_INFO_PROCESS with a new corresponding struct.
This change migrates libstd.
See [fxrev.dev/510478](https://fxrev.dev/510478) and [fxbug.dev/30751](https://fxbug.dev/30751) for more detail.
Add abstract namespace support for Unix domain sockets
Hello! The other day I wanted to mess around with UDS in Rust and found that abstract namespaces ([unix(7)](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/unix.7.html)) on Linux still needed development. I took the approach of adding `_addr` specific public functions to reduce conflicts.
Feature name: `unix_socket_abstract`
Tracking issue: #85410
Further context: #42048
## Non-platform specific additions
`UnixListener::bind_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<UnixListener>`
`UnixStream::connect_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<()>`
`UnixDatagram::bind_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<UnixDatagram>`
`UnixDatagram::connect_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<()>`
`UnixDatagram::send_to_addr(&self, &[u8], &SocketAddr) -> Result<usize>`
## Platform-specific (Linux) additions
`SocketAddr::from_abstract_namespace(&[u8]) -> SocketAddr`
`SockerAddr::as_abstract_namespace() -> Option<&[u8]>`
## Example
```rust
#![feature(unix_socket_abstract)]
use std::os::unix::net::{UnixListener, SocketAddr};
fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
let addr = SocketAddr::from_abstract_namespace(b"namespace")?; // Linux only
let listener = match UnixListener::bind_addr(&addr) {
Ok(sock) => sock,
Err(err) => {
println!("Couldn't bind: {:?}", err);
return Err(err);
}
};
Ok(())
}
```
## Further Details
The main inspiration for the implementation came from the [nix-rust](https://github.com/nix-rust/nix/blob/master/src/sys/socket/addr.rs#L558) crate but there are also other [historical](c4db0685b1) [attempts](https://github.com/tormol/uds/blob/master/src/addr.rs#L324) with similar approaches.
A comment I did have was with this change, we now allow a `SocketAddr` to be constructed explicitly rather than just used almost as a handle for the return of `peer_addr` and `local_addr`. We could consider adding other explicit constructors (e.g. `SocketAddr::from_pathname`, `SockerAddr::from_unnamed`).
Cheers!
Use BCryptGenRandom instead of RtlGenRandom on Windows.
This removes usage of RtlGenRandom on Windows, in favour of BCryptGenRandom.
BCryptGenRandom isn't available on XP, but we dropped XP support a while ago.
The fuchsia platform is in the process of softly transitioning over to
using a new value for ZX_INFO_PROCESS with a new corresponding struct.
This change migrates libstd.
See fxrev.dev/510478 and fxbug.dev/30751 for more detail.
Fix ctrl-c causing reads of stdin to return empty on Windows.
Pressing ctrl+c (or ctrl+break) on Windows caused a blocking read of stdin to unblock and return empty, unlike other platforms which continue to block.
On ctrl-c, `ReadConsoleW` will return success, but also set `LastError` to `ERROR_OPERATION_ABORTED`.
This change detects this case, and re-tries the call to `ReadConsoleW`.
Fixes#89177. See issue for further details.
Tested on Windows 7 and Windows 10 with both MSVC and GNU toolchains
Improve `std:🧵:available_parallelism` docs
_Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74479_
This PR reworks the documentation of `std:🧵:available_parallelism`, as requested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89324#issuecomment-934343254).
## Changes
The following changes are made:
- We've removed prior mentions of "hardware threads" and instead centers the docs around "parallelism" as a resource available to a program.
- We now provide examples of when `available_parallelism` may return numbers that differ from the number of CPU cores in the host machine.
- We now mention that the amount of available parallelism may change over time.
- We make note of which platform components we don't take into account which more advanced users may want to take note of.
- The example has been updated, which should be a bit easier to use.
- We've added a docs alias to `num-cpus` which provides similar functionality to `available_parallelism`, and is one of the most popular crates on crates.io.
---
Thanks!
r? `@BurntSushi`
Add #[must_use] to is_condition tests
I threw in `std::path::Path::has_root` for funsies.
A continuation of #89718.
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
Add #[must_use] to non-mutating verb methods
These are methods that could be misconstrued to mutate their input, similar to #89694. I gave each one a different custom message.
I wrote that `upgrade` and `downgrade` don't modify the input pointers. Logically they don't, but technically they do...
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
Add #[must_use] to from_value conversions
I added two methods to the list myself. Clippy did not flag them because they take `mut` args, but neither modifies their argument.
```rust
core::str const unsafe fn from_utf8_unchecked_mut(v: &mut [u8]) -> &mut str;
std::ffi::CString unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *mut c_char) -> CString;
```
I put a custom note on `from_raw`:
```rust
#[must_use = "call `drop(from_raw(ptr))` if you intend to drop the `CString`"]
pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *mut c_char) -> CString {
```
Parent issue: #89692
r? ``@joshtriplett``
Add new tier-3 target: armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabihf
This change adds a new tier-3 target: armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabihf
This target is primarily used in embedded linux devices where system resources are slim and glibc is deemed too heavyweight. Cross compilation C toolchains are available [here](https://toolchains.bootlin.com/) or via [buildroot](https://buildroot.org).
The change is based largely on a previous PR #79380 with a few minor modifications. The author of that PR was unable to push the PR forward, and graciously allowed me to take it over.
Per the [target tier 3 policy](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2803-target-tier-policy.md), I volunteer to be the "target maintainer".
This is my first PR to Rust itself, so I apologize if I've missed things!
