Override `StepBy::{try_fold, try_rfold}`
Previous PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51435
The previous PR was closed in favor of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51601, which was later reverted. I don't think these implementations will make it harder to specialize `StepBy<Range<_>>` later, so we should be able to land this without any consequences.
This should fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57517 – in my benchmarks `iter` and `iter.step_by(1)` now perform equally well, provided internal iteration is used.
Resolve attributes in several places
Resolve attributes for Arm, Field, FieldPat, GenericParam, Param, StructField and Variant.
This PR is based on @petrochenkov work located at 83fdb8d598.
Stabilize `bind_by_move_pattern_guards` in Rust 1.39.0
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15287.
After stabilizing `#![feature(bind_by_move_pattern_guards)]`, you can now use bind-by-move bindings in patterns and take references to those bindings in `if` guards of `match` expressions. For example, the following now becomes legal:
```rust
fn main() {
let array: Box<[u8; 4]> = Box::new([1, 2, 3, 4]);
match array {
nums
// ---- `nums` is bound by move.
if nums.iter().sum::<u8>() == 10
// ^------ `.iter()` implicitly takes a reference to `nums`.
=> {
drop(nums);
// --------- Legal as `nums` was bound by move and so we have ownership.
}
_ => unreachable!(),
}
}
```
r? @matthewjasper
compiletest: disable -Aunused for run-pass tests
Disabled the flag, but that led to quite a bit of fall out -- I think most of it is benign but I've not investigated thoroughly.
r? @petrochenkov
Refactor the `MirPass for QualifyAndPromoteConstants`
This is an accumulation of drive-by commits while working on `Vec::new` as a stable `const fn`.
The PR is probably easiest read commit-by-commit.
r? @oli-obk
cc @eddyb @ecstatic-morse -- your two PRs https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63812 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63860 respectively will conflict with this a tiny bit but it should be trivial to reintegrate your changes atop of this.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #62205 (Add Iterator comparison methods that take a comparison function)
- #64152 (Use backtrace formatting from the backtrace crate)
- #64265 (resolve: Mark more erroneous imports as used)
- #64267 (rustdoc: fix diagnostic with mixed code block styles)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
rustdoc: fix diagnostic with mixed code block styles
This fixes a relatively obscure issue where the diagnostic (emitted [here](ef54f57c5b/src/librustdoc/passes/check_code_block_syntax.rs (L69))) would get confused since the "is_fenced" flag wasn't reset properly.
Add Iterator comparison methods that take a comparison function
This PR adds `Iterator::{cmp_by, partial_cmp_by, eq_by, ne_by, lt_by, le_by, gt_by, ge_by}`. We already have `Iterator::{cmp, partial_cmp, ...}` which are less general (but not any simpler) than the ones I'm proposing here.
I'm submitting this PR now because #61505 has been merged, so this change should not have a noticeable effect on the `Iterator` docs page size.
The diff is quite messy, here's what I changed:
- The logic of `cmp` / `partial_cmp` / `eq` is moved to `cmp_by` / `partial_cmp_by` / `eq_by` respectively, changing `x.cmp(&y)` to `cmp(&x, &y)` in the `cmp` method where `cmp` is the given comparison function (and similar for `partial_cmp_by` and `eq_by`).
- `ne_by` / `lt_by` / `le_by` / `gt_by` / `ge_by` are each implemented in terms of one of the three methods above.
- The existing comparison methods are each forwarded to their `_by` counterpart, passing one of `Ord::cmp` / `PartialOrd::partial_cmp` / `PartialEq::eq` as the comparison function.
The corresponding `_by_key` methods aren't included because they're not as fundamental as the `_by` methods and can easily be implemented in terms of them. Is that reasonable, or would adding the `_by_key` methods be desirable for the sake of completeness?
I didn't add any tests – I couldn't think of any that weren't already covered by our existing tests. Let me know if there's a particular test that would be useful to add.
Fix regex replacement in theme detection
Fixes#64061.
This is sadly a lot of bad luck: after making the changes and re-build the docs, I just forgot to force reload the page. Hence having the old (working) version with two replacements instead of the failing regex. Sorry again about that...
cc @fenhl
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Rustdoc: formatting to buffers
This should be reviewed commit-by-commit.
I've not attempted to fully flesh out what the end state of this PR could look like yet as I wanted to get it up for some early feedback (I already think this has some wins, too, so we could land it as-is).
The primary idea with `Buffer` is that it internally tracks whether we're printing to HTML or text, and the goal is that eventually instead of branch on `fmt.alternate()` anywhere, we'd call a helper like `buf.nbsp()` which would either return ` ` or ` ` depending on the target we're printing to. Obviously, that's not included in this PR, in part because it was already getting quite big.
