Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91668 (Remove the match on `ErrorKind::Other`)
- #91678 (Add tests fixed by #90023)
- #91679 (Move core/stream/stream/mod.rs to core/stream/stream.rs)
- #91681 (fix typo in `intrinsics::raw_eq` docs)
- #91686 (Fix `Vec::reserve_exact` documentation)
- #91697 (Delete Utf8Lossy::from_str)
- #91706 (Add unstable book entries for parts of asm that are not being stabilized)
- #91709 (Replace iterator-based set construction by *Set::From<[T; N]>)
- #91716 (Improve x.py logging and defaults a bit more)
- #91747 (Add pierwill to .mailmap)
- #91755 (Fix since attribute for const_linked_list_new feature)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Replace iterator-based set construction by *Set::From<[T; N]>
This uses the array-based construction for `BtreeSet`s and `HashSet`s instead of first creating an iterator. I could also replace the `let mut a = Set::new(); a.insert(...);` fragments if desired.
Fix `Vec::reserve_exact` documentation
The documentation previously said the new capacity cannot overflow `usize`, but in fact it cannot exceed `isize::MAX`.
Update documentation to use `from()` to initialize `HashMap`s and `BTreeMap`s
As of Rust 1.56, `HashMap` and `BTreeMap` both have associated `from()` functions. I think using these in the documentation cleans things up a bit. It allows us to remove some of the `mut`s and avoids the Initialize-Then-Modify anti-pattern.
replace vec::Drain drop loops with drop_in_place
The `Drain::drop` implementation came up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82185#issuecomment-789584796 as potentially interfering with other optimization work due its widespread use somewhere in `println!`
`@rustbot` label T-libs-impl
Suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact
During developing #91529 , I found that `try_reserve_exact` suggests `reserve` for further insertions. I think it's a mistake by copy&paste, `try_reserve` is better here.
Implement VecDeque::retain_mut
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90829.
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90772, someone suggested that `retain_mut` should also be implemented on `VecDeque`. I think that it follows the same logic (coherency). So first: is it ok? Second: should I create a new feature for it or can we put it into the same one?
r? `@joshtriplett`
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #88906 (Implement write() method for Box<MaybeUninit<T>>)
- #90269 (Make `Option::expect` unstably const)
- #90854 (Type can be unsized and uninhabited)
- #91170 (rustdoc: preload fonts)
- #91273 (Fix ICE #91268 by checking that the snippet ends with a `)`)
- #91381 (Android: -ldl must appear after -lgcc when linking)
- #91453 (Document Windows TLS drop behaviour)
- #91462 (Use try_normalize_erasing_regions in needs_drop)
- #91474 (suppress warning about set_errno being unused on DragonFly)
- #91483 (Sync rustfmt subtree)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Implement write() method for Box<MaybeUninit<T>>
This adds method similar to `MaybeUninit::write` main difference being
it returns owned `Box`. This can be used to elide copy from stack
safely, however it's not currently tested that the optimization actually
occurs.
Analogous methods are not provided for `Rc` and `Arc` as those need to
handle the possibility of sharing. Some version of them may be added in
the future.
This was discussed in #63291 which this change extends.
Remove unnecessary check in VecDeque::grow
All callers already check that the buffer is full before calling
`grow()`. This is where it makes the most sense, since `grow()` is
`inline(never)` and we don't want to pay for a function call just for
that check.
It could also be argued that it would be correct to call `grow()` even
if the buffer wasn't full yet.
This change breaks no code since `grow()` is not `pub`.
This adds method similar to `MaybeUninit::write` main difference being
it returns owned `Box`. This can be used to elide copy from stack
safely, however it's not currently tested that the optimization actually
occurs.
Analogous methods are not provided for `Rc` and `Arc` as those need to
handle the possibility of sharing. Some version of them may be added in
the future.
This was discussed in #63291 which this change extends.
Introduce `RawVec::reserve_for_push`.
If `Vec::push`'s capacity check fails it calls `RawVec::reserve`, which
then also does a capacity check.
This commit introduces `reserve_for_push` which skips the redundant
capacity check, for some slight compile time speed-ups.
I tried lots of minor variations on this, e.g. different inlining
attributes. This was the best one I could find.
r? `@ghost`
All callers already check that the buffer is full before calling
`grow()`. This is where it makes the most sense, since `grow()` is
`inline(never)` and we don't want to pay for a function call just for
that check.
It could also be argued that it would be correct to call `grow()` even
if the buffer wasn't full yet.
This change breaks no code since `grow()` is not `pub`.
If `Vec::push`'s capacity check fails it calls `RawVec::reserve`, which
then also does a capacity check.
This commit introduces `reserve_for_push` which skips the redundant
capacity check, for some slight compile time speed-ups.
I tried lots of minor variations on this, e.g. different inlining
attributes. This was the best one I could find.
Eliminate an unreachable codepath from String::from_utf8_lossy
`Utf8Lossy`'s `Iterator` implementation ensures that only the **final** chunk has an empty slice for `broken`:
dd549dcab4/library/core/src/str/lossy.rs (L46-L47)
Thus the only way the **first** chunk could have an empty `broken` is if it is the **final** chunk, i.e. there is only one chunk total. And the only way that there could be one chunk total with an empty `broken` is if the whole input is valid utf8 and non-empty.
That condition has already been handled by an early return, so at the point that the first `REPLACEMENT` is being pushed, it's impossible for `first_broken` to be empty.
Utf8Lossy's Iterator implementation ensures that only the final chunk
has an empty slice for broken. Thus the only way the first chunk could
have an empty broken is if it is the final chunk, i.e. there is only one
chunk total. And the only way that there could be one chunk total is if
the whole input is valid utf8 and non-empty. That condition has already
been handled by an early return, so at the point that the first
REPLACEMENT is being pushed, it's impossible for first_broken to be
empty.
Mark `Arc::from_inner` / `Rc::from_inner` as unsafe
While it's an internal function, it is easy to create invalid Arc/Rcs to
a dangling pointer with it.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89740
Add Vec::retain_mut
This is to continue the discussion started in #83218.
Original comment was:
> Take 2 of #34265, since I needed this today.
The reason I think why we should add `retain_mut` is for coherency and for discoverability. For example we have `chunks` and `chunks_mut` or `get` and `get_mut` or `iter` and `iter_mut`, etc. When looking for mutable `retain`, I would expect `retain_mut` to exist. It took me a while to find out about `drain_filter`. So even if it provides an API close to `drain_filter`, just for the discoverability, I think it's worth it.
cc ``````@m-ou-se`````` ``````@jonas-schievink`````` ``````@Mark-Simulacrum``````
Optimize BinaryHeap::extend from Vec
This improves the performance of extending `BinaryHeap`s from vectors directly. Future work may involve extending this optimization to other, similar, cases where the length of the added elements is well-known, but this is not yet done in this PR.
Make RawVec private to alloc
RawVec was previously exposed for compiler-internal use (libarena specifically) in 1acbb0a935
Since it is unstable, doc-hidden and has no associated tracking issue it was never meant for public use. And since
it is no longer used outside alloc itself it can be made private again.
Also remove some functions that are dead due to lack of internal users.
Better document `Box` and `alloc::alloc::box_free` connection
The internal `alloc::alloc::box_free` function requires that its signature matches the `owned_box` struct's declaration, but previously that connection was only documented on the `box_free` function.
This PR makes the documentation two-way to help anyone making theoretical changes to `Box` to see the connection, since changes are more likely to originate from `Box`.
