**Description**
Add the `addr`, `with_addr, `map_addr` methods to the `NonNull` type,
and map the address type to `NonZeroUsize`.
**Motiviation**
The `NonNull` type is useful for implementing pointer types which have
the 0-niche. It is currently possible to implement these provenance
preserving functions by calling `NonNull::as_ptr` and `new_unchecked`.
The addition of these methods simply make it more ergonomic to use.
**Testing**
Added a unit test of a nonnull tagged pointer type. This is based on
some real code I have elsewhere, that currently routes the pointer
through a `NonZeroUsize` and back out to produce a usable pointer.
interpret: make isize::MAX the limit for dynamic value sizes
We are currently enforcing `data_layout.obj_size_bound()` as the maximal dynamic size of a Rust value (including for `size_of_val_raw`), but that does not match the docs.
In particular, Miri currently falsely says that this code has UB:
```rust
#![feature(layout_for_ptr)]
fn main() {
let size = isize::MAX as usize;
// Creating a raw slice of size isize::MAX and asking for its size is okay.
let s = std::ptr::slice_from_raw_parts(1usize as *const u8, size);
assert_eq!(size, unsafe { std::mem::size_of_val_raw(s) });
}
```
Better suggestions for `Fn`-family trait selection errors
1. Suppress suggestions to add `std::ops::Fn{,Mut,Once}` bounds when a type already implements `Fn{,Mut,Once}`
2. Add a note that points out that a type does in fact implement `Fn{,Mut,Once}`, but the arguments vary (either by number or by actual arguments)
3. Add a note that points out that a type does in fact implement `Fn{,Mut,Once}`, but not the right one (e.g. implements `FnMut`, but `Fn` is required).
Fixes#95147
Update target_has_atomic documentation for stabilization
`cfg(target_has_atomic)` was stabilized in #93824, but this small note in the docs was not updated at the time.
Specialize infinite-type "insert some indirection" suggestion for Option
Suggest `Option<Box<_>>` instead of `Box<Option<_>>` for infinitely-recursive members of a struct.
Not sure if I can get the span of the generic subty of the Option so I can make this a `+++`-style suggestion. The current output is a tiny bit less fancy looking than the original suggestion.
Should I limit the specialization to just `Option<Box<TheOuterStruct>>`? Because right now it applies to all `Option` members in the struct that are returned by `Representability::SelfRecursive`.
Fixes#91402
r? `@estebank`
(since you wrote the original suggestion and are definitely most familiar with it!)
Make lowering pull-based
~Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90451~
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88186
The current lowering code visits all the item-likes in the AST in order, and lowers them one by one.
This PR changes it to index the AST and then proceed to lowering on-demand. This is closer to the logic of query-based lowering.
