[fuchsia] Add implementation for `current_exe`
This implementation returns a best attempt at the current exe path. On
fuchsia, fdio will always use `argv[0]` as the process name and if it is
not set then an error will be returned. Because this is not guaranteed
to be the case, this implementation returns an error if `argv` does not
contain any elements.
remove_dir_all_recursive: treat ELOOP the same as ENOTDIR
On older Linux kernels (I tested on 4.4, corresponding to Ubuntu 16.04), opening a symlink using `O_DIRECTORY | O_NOFOLLOW` returns `ELOOP` instead of `ENOTDIR`. We should handle it the same, since a symlink is still not a directory and needs to be `unlink`ed.
Use sys::unix::locks::futex* on wasm+atomics.
This removes the wasm-specific lock implementations and instead re-uses the implementations from sys::unix.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93740
cc ``@alexcrichton``
Improve AddrParseError description
The existing description was incorrect for socket addresses, and misleading: users would see “invalid IP address syntax” and suppose they were supposed to provide an IP address rather than a socket address.
I contemplated making it two variants (IP, socket), but realised we can do still better for the IPv4 and IPv6 types, so here it is as six.
I contemplated more precise error descriptions (e.g. “invalid IPv6 socket address syntax: expected a decimal scope ID after %”), but that’s a more invasive change, and probably not worthwhile anyway.
This implementation returns a best attempt at the current exe path. On
fuchsia, fdio will always use `argv[0]` as the process name and if it is
not set then an error will be returned. Because this is not guaranteed
to be the case, this implementation returns an error if `argv` does not
contain any elements.
The existing description was incorrect for socket addresses, and
misleading: users would see “invalid IP address syntax” and suppose they
were supposed to provide an IP address rather than a socket address.
I contemplated making it two variants (IP, socket), but realised we can
do still better for the IPv4 and IPv6 types, so here it is as six.
I contemplated more precise error descriptions (e.g. “invalid IPv6
socket address syntax: expected a decimal scope ID after %”), but that’s
a more invasive change, and probably not worthwhile anyway.
Use a single ReentrantMutex implementation on all platforms.
This replaces all platform specific ReentrantMutex implementations by the one I added in #95727 for Linux, since that one does not depend on any platform specific details.
r? `@Amanieu`
fix error handling for pthread_sigmask(3)
Errors from `pthread_sigmask(3)` were handled using `cvt()`, which expects a return value of `-1` on error and uses `errno`.
However, `pthread_sigmask(3)` returns `0` on success and an error number otherwise.
Fix it by replacing `cvt()` with `cvt_nz()`.
Use u32 instead of i32 for futexes.
This changes futexes from i32 to u32. The [Linux man page](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/futex.2.html) uses `uint32_t` for them, so I'm not sure why I used i32 for them. Maybe because I first used them for thread parkers, where I used -1, 0, and 1 as the states.
(Wasm's `memory.atomic.wait32` does use `i32`, because wasm doesn't support `u32`.)
It doesn't matter much, but using the unsigned type probably results in fewer surprises when shifting bits around or using comparison operators.
r? ```@Amanieu```
Create (unstable) 2024 edition
[On Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Deprecating.20macro.20scoping.20shenanigans/near/272860652), there was a small aside regarding creating the 2024 edition now as opposed to later. There was a reasonable amount of support and no stated opposition.
This change creates the 2024 edition in the compiler and creates a prelude for the 2024 edition. There is no current difference between the 2021 and 2024 editions. Cargo and other tools will need to be updated separately, as it's not in the same repository. This change permits the vast majority of work towards the next edition to proceed _now_ instead of waiting until 2024.
For sanity purposes, I've merged the "hello" UI tests into a single file with multiple revisions. Otherwise we'd end up with a file per edition, despite them being essentially identical.
````@rustbot```` label +T-lang +S-waiting-on-review
Not sure on the relevant team, to be honest.
Windows: Use a pipe relay for chaining pipes
Fixes#95759
This fixes the issue by chaining pipes synchronously and manually pumping messages between them. It's not ideal but it has the advantage of not costing anything if pipes are not chained ("don't pay for what you don't use") and it also avoids breaking existing code that rely on our end of the pipe being asynchronous (which includes rustc's own testing framework).
Libraries can avoid needing this by using their own pipes to chain commands.
Document that DirEntry holds the directory open
I had a bug where holding onto DirEntry structs caused file descriptor exhaustion, and thought it would be good to document this.
Replace RwLock by a futex based one on Linux
This replaces the pthread-based RwLock on Linux by a futex based one.
This implementation is similar to [the algorithm](https://gist.github.com/kprotty/3042436aa55620d8ebcddf2bf25668bc) suggested by `@kprotty,` but modified to prefer writers and spin before sleeping. It uses two futexes: One for the readers to wait on, and one for the writers to wait on. The readers futex contains the state of the RwLock: The number of readers, a bit indicating whether writers are waiting, and a bit indicating whether readers are waiting. The writers futex is used as a simple condition variable and its contents are meaningless; it just needs to be changed on every notification.
Using two futexes rather than one has the obvious advantage of allowing a separate queue for readers and writers, but it also means we avoid the problem a single-futex RwLock would have of making it hard for a writer to go to sleep while the number of readers is rapidly changing up and down, as the writers futex is only changed when we actually want to wake up a writer.
It always prefers writers, as we decided [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93740#issuecomment-1070696128).
To be able to prefer writers, it relies on futex_wake to return the number of awoken threads to be able to handle write-unlocking while both the readers-waiting and writers-waiting bits are set. Instead of waking both and letting them race, it first wakes writers and only continues to wake the readers too if futex_wake reported there were no writers to wake up.
r? `@Amanieu`
Remove ptr-int transmute in std::sync::mpsc
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95340 landed, Miri with `-Zmiri-check-number-validity` produces an error on the test suites of some crates which implement concurrency tools<sup>*</sup>, because it seems like such crates tend to use `std::sync::mpsc` in their tests. This fixes the problem by storing pointer bytes in a pointer.
<sup>*</sup> I have so far seen errors in the test suites of `once_cell`, `parking_lot`, and `crossbeam-utils`.
(just updating the list for fun, idk)
Also `threadpool`, `async-lock`, `futures-timer`, `fragile`, `scoped_threadpool`, `procfs`, `slog-async`, `scheduled-thread-pool`, `tokio-threadpool`, `mac`, `futures-cpupool`, `ntest`, `actix`, `zbus`, `jsonrpc-client-transports`, `fail`, `libp2p-gossipsub`, `parity-send-wrapper`, `async-broadcast,` `libp2p-relay`, `http-client`, `mockito`, `simple-mutex`, `surf`, `pollster`, and `pulse`. Then I turned the bot off.
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95340 landed, Miri with
-Zmiri-check-number-validity produces an error on the test suites of
some crates which implement concurrency tools, because it seems like
such crates tend to use std::sync::mpsc in their tests. This fixes the
problem by storing pointer bytes in a pointer.
