This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].
There are also some other typos in the function names, variable names, and file
names, which I leave as they are. I'm more certain that typos in comments
should be fixed.
[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
fix: Fix incorrect type mismatch with `cfg_if!` and other macros in expression position
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12940
This is a bit of a hack, ideally `MacroStmts` would not exist at all after HIR lowering, but that requires changing how the lowering code works.
fix: make `concat!` work with char
Fixes#12921
- I avoided making `unquote_str()` take char literals as well because it's depended on by another function `parse_string()` that's only supposed to take strings.
- Even with this patch, we don't output `\0` as `\u{0}` which #12921 pointed out ~~, but we're not actually responsible for serializing it but rowan is~~. They are functionally equivalent and I don't think it'd cause any confusion, but we *could* try escaping them before serialization (for reference, `rustc -Zunpretty=expanded`, which `cargo expand` uses under the hood, [makes use of `str::escape_default()`](3830ecaa8d/compiler/rustc_ast/src/util/literal.rs (L161)).
internal: Use ItemTree for variant, field and module attribute collection in attrs_query
Less parsing = very good, should speed up lang item collection as that basically probes attributes of all enum variants which currently triggers parsing
Not fond of how this is searching for the correct index, ideally we'd map between HIR and item tree Id here but I am not sure how, storing the item tree ids in the HIR version doesn't work due to the usage of `Trace`...
internal: Record all macro definitions in ItemScope
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12100
Doesn't resolve the shadowing issues though, fixing those is gonna be really tricky I believe unless we can come up with a nice scheme to "order" item tree items (using syntax ranges and file ids would be a pain and also a bad idea since that'll require us to potentially reparse files in collection).
fix: Simplify macro statement expansion handling
I only meant to fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12644 but that somehow turned into a rewrite of the statement handling ... at least this fixes a few more issues in the IDE layer now
feat: implement destructuring assignment
This is an attempt to implement destructuring assignments, or more specifically, type inference for [assignee expressions](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions.html#place-expressions-and-value-expressions).
I'm not sure if this is the right approach, so I don't even expect this to be merged (hence the branch name 😉) but rather want to propose one direction we could choose. I don't mind getting merged if this is good enough though!
Some notes on the implementation choices:
- Assignee expressions are **not** desugared on HIR level unlike rustc, but are inferred directly along with other expressions. This matches the processing of other syntaxes that are desugared in rustc but not in r-a. I find this reasonable because r-a only needs to infer types and it's easier to relate AST nodes and HIR nodes, so I followed it.
- Assignee expressions obviously resemble patterns, so type inference for each kind of pattern and its corresponding assignee expressions share a significant amount of logic. I tried to reuse the type inference functions for patterns by introducing `PatLike` trait which generalizes assignee expressions and patterns.
- This is not the most elegant solution I suspect (and I really don't like the name of the trait!), but it's cleaner and the change is smaller than other ways I experimented, like making the functions generic without such trait, or making them take `Either<ExprId, PatId>` in place of `PatId`.
in case this is merged:
Closes#11532Closes#11839Closes#12322
Distinguish between
- there is no build data (for some reason?)
- there is build data, but the cargo package didn't build a proc macro dylib
- there is a proc macro dylib, but it didn't contain the proc macro we expected
- the name did not resolve to any macro (this is now an
unresolved_macro_call even for attributes)
I changed the handling of disabled attribute macro expansion to
immediately ignore the macro and report an unresolved_proc_macro,
because otherwise they would now result in loud unresolved_macro_call
errors. I hope this doesn't break anything.
Also try to improve error ranges for unresolved_macro_call / macro_error
by reusing the code for unresolved_proc_macro. It's not perfect but
probably better than before.
fix methods in pub trait generated by macro cannot be completed
Fix#12483
Check if the container is trait and inherit the visibility to associate items during collection.
