14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marijn Haverbeke
fc6b7c8b38 Reformat for new mode syntax, step 1
Long lines were fixed in a very crude way, as I'll be following up
with another reformat in a bit.
2011-09-12 12:04:14 +02:00
Brian Anderson
5c49e4f4e9 Reformat. Issue #855 2011-09-02 22:11:42 -07:00
Tim Chevalier
268533a920 Add a precondition on vec::zip
vec::zip now has the precondition that the two argument vectors
are the same length. Changed uses of it to reflect that.

Also added a few vector-enumerating utilities to vec.rs, which
necessitated in making some functions in u8 declared-pure.
2011-08-30 16:39:22 -07:00
Marijn Haverbeke
c9c5ee252a Implement non-internal ivecs
Vectors are now similar to our old, pre-internal vectors, except that
they are uniquely owned, not refcounted.

Their name should probably change too, then. I've renamed them to vec
in the runtime, will do so throughout the compiler later.
2011-08-29 09:07:53 +02:00
Tim Chevalier
d9bc3cb10c Change "pred" to "pure fn" in all libraries and test cases 2011-08-25 18:24:45 -07:00
Brian Anderson
c274d16b7f Eliminate unused variable warnings in stdtest 2011-08-22 21:33:52 -07:00
Brian Anderson
518dc52f85 Reformat
This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to
[] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-20 11:04:00 -07:00
Erick Tryzelaar
b3eba15271 Port the tests to the expr foo::<T> syntax. 2011-08-16 15:05:57 -07:00
Erick Tryzelaar
21f46a1655 Port the tests to the typaram foo<T> syntax. 2011-08-16 15:05:56 -07:00
Brian Anderson
f05a91a0dc Rename std::ivec to std::vec 2011-08-16 10:36:19 -07:00
Brian Anderson
97dc75da16 Remove stdtest::vec 2011-08-12 12:11:11 -07:00
Michael Sullivan
8a9766000e Change a bunch of places in the stdlib to use blocks. 2011-08-12 11:47:44 -07:00
Marijn Haverbeke
df7f21db09 Reformat for new syntax 2011-07-27 15:54:33 +02:00
Brian Anderson
2573fe7026 The Big Test Suite Overhaul
This replaces the make-based test runner with a set of Rust-based test
runners. I believe that all existing functionality has been
preserved. The primary objective is to dogfood the Rust test
framework.

A few main things happen here:

1) The run-pass/lib-* tests are all moved into src/test/stdtest. This
is a standalone test crate intended for all standard library tests. It
compiles to build/test/stdtest.stageN.

2) rustc now compiles into yet another build artifact, this one a test
runner that runs any tests contained directly in the rustc crate. This
allows much more fine-grained unit testing of the compiler. It
compiles to build/test/rustctest.stageN.

3) There is a new custom test runner crate at src/test/compiletest
that reproduces all the functionality for running the compile-fail,
run-fail, run-pass and bench tests while integrating with Rust's test
framework. It compiles to build/test/compiletest.stageN.

4) The build rules have been completely changed to use the new test
runners, while also being less redundant, following the example of the
recent stageN.mk rewrite.

It adds two new features to the cfail/rfail/rpass/bench tests:

1) Tests can specify multiple 'error-pattern' directives which must be
satisfied in order.

2) Tests can specify a 'compile-flags' directive which will make the
test runner provide additional command line arguments to rustc.

There are some downsides, the primary being that Rust has to be
functioning pretty well just to run _any_ tests, which I imagine will
be the source of some frustration when the entire test suite
breaks. Will also cause some headaches during porting.

Not having individual make rules, each rpass, etc test no longer
remembers between runs whether it completed successfully. As a result,
it's not possible to incrementally fix multiple tests by just running
'make check', fixing a test, and repeating without re-running all the
tests contained in the test runner. Instead you can filter just the
tests you want to run by using the TESTNAME environment variable.

This also dispenses with the ability to run stage0 tests, but they
tended to be broken more often than not anyway.
2011-07-24 15:34:34 -07:00