Show `used attribute`'s kind for user when find it isn't applied to a `static` variable.
For example :
```rust
extern "C" {
#[used] //~ ERROR attribute must be applied to a `static` variable
static FOO: i32; // show the kind of this item to help user understand why the error is reported.
}
```
fixes#126789
In the stabilization attempt of `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`, a concern
was raised related to using a language attribute for the feature: Long
term, we want `fn lang_start()` to be definable by any crate, not just
libstd. Having a special language attribute in that case becomes
awkward.
So as a first step towards towards the next stabilization attempt, this
PR changes the `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` attribute to a compiler flag
`-Zon-broken-pipe=...` to remove that concern, since now the language
is not "contaminated" by this feature.
Another point was also raised, namely that the ui should not leak
**how** it does things, but rather what the **end effect** is. The new
flag uses the proposed naming. This is of course something that can be
iterated on further before stabilization.
`-Z debug-macros` is "stabilized" by enabling it by default and removing.
`-Z collapse-macro-debuginfo` is stabilized as `-C collapse-macro-debuginfo`.
It now supports all typical boolean values (`parse_opt_bool`) in addition to just yes/no.
Default value of `collapse_debuginfo` was changed from `false` to `external` (i.e. collapsed if external, not collapsed if local).
`#[collapse_debuginfo]` attribute without a value is no longer supported to avoid guessing the default.
Test `#[unix_sigpipe = "inherit"]` with both `SIG_DFL` and `SIG_IGN`
Extend our `#[unix_sigpipe = "inherit"]` test so that it detects if `SIGPIPE` wrongly ends up being `SIG_DFL` when the parent has `SIG_IGN`. We have no current test for this particular case.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889
Add a test that fails if `#[unix_sigpipe = "inherit"]` wrongly results
in `SIGPIPE` being `SIG_DFL` if the parent has `SIG_IGN`. We have no
current test for this particular case.
The `sig_dfl` variant of the attribute is the most likely variant to be
stabilized first, and thus to become the "most allowed" variant of the
attribute. Because of this, it is the most appropriate variant to use in
syntax tests, because even if the most allowed variant is used, the
compiler shall still emit errors if it e.g. is used in the wrong places.
Remove `Word` from the `unix_sigpipe` attribute template so that plain
`#[unix_sigpipe]` is not included in suggestions of valid forms of the
attribute. Also re-arrange diagnostics code slightly to avoid duplicate
diagnostics.
unix_sigpipe: Simple fixes and improvements in tests
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832 I included 5 preparatory commits.
It will take a while before discussions there and in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62569 is settled, so here is a PR that splits out 4 of the commits that are easy to review, to get them out of the way.
r? ``@davidtwco`` who already approved these commits in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832 (but I have tweaked them a bit and rebased them since then).
For the convenience of my reviewer, here are the full commit messages of the commits:
<details>
<summary>Click to expand</summary>
```
commit 948b1d68ab (HEAD -> unix_sigpipe-tests-fixes, origin/unix_sigpipe-tests-fixes)
Author: Martin Nordholts <martin.nordholts@codetale.se>
Date: Fri Feb 9 07:57:27 2024 +0100
tests: Add unix_sigpipe-different-duplicates.rs test variant
To make sure that
#[unix_sigpipe = "x"]
#[unix_sigpipe = "y"]
behaves like
#[unix_sigpipe = "x"]
#[unix_sigpipe = "x"]
commit d14f15862d
Author: Martin Nordholts <martin.nordholts@codetale.se>
Date: Fri Feb 9 08:47:47 2024 +0100
tests: Combine unix_sigpipe-not-used.rs and unix_sigpipe-only-feature.rs
The only difference between the files is the presence/absence of
#![feature(unix_sigpipe)]
attribute. Avoid duplication by using revisions instead.
commit a1cb3dba84
Author: Martin Nordholts <martin.nordholts@codetale.se>
Date: Fri Feb 9 06:44:56 2024 +0100
tests: Rename unix_sigpipe.rs to unix_sigpipe-bare.rs for clarity
The test is for the "bare" variant of the attribute that looks like this:
#[unix_sigpipe]
which is not allowed, because it must look like this:
#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_ign"]
commit e060274e55
Author: Martin Nordholts <martin.nordholts@codetale.se>
Date: Fri Feb 9 05:48:24 2024 +0100
tests: Fix typo unix_sigpipe-error.rs -> unix_sigpipe-sig_ign.rs
There is no error expected. It's simply the "regular" test for sig_ign.
So rename it.
```
</details>
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889
In `auxiliary/sigpipe-utils.rs`, all we want to know is the current
`SIGPIPE` disposition. We should not change it. So use `libc::sigaction`
instead of `libc::signal`. That way we can also remove the code that
restores it.
The test is for the "bare" variant of the attribute that looks like this:
#[unix_sigpipe]
which is not allowed, because it must look like this:
#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_ign"]
Do not provide a structured suggestion when the arguments don't match.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `test_mut` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/auto-ref-slice-plus-ref.rs:7:7
|
LL | a.test_mut();
| ^^^^^^^^
|
= help: items from traits can only be used if the trait is implemented and in scope
note: `MyIter` defines an item `test_mut`, perhaps you need to implement it
--> $DIR/auto-ref-slice-plus-ref.rs:14:1
|
LL | trait MyIter {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: there is a method `get_mut` with a similar name, but with different arguments
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/slice/mod.rs:LL:COL
```
Consider methods beyond inherent ones when suggesting typos.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `owned` found for reference `&dyn Foo` in the current scope
--> $DIR/object-pointer-types.rs:11:7
|
LL | fn owned(self: Box<Self>);
| --------- the method might not be found because of this arbitrary self type
...
LL | x.owned();
| ^^^^^ help: there is a method with a similar name: `to_owned`
```
Fix#101013.
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:20:14
|
LL | x.append(42);
| ------ ^^ expected `&mut Vec<{integer}>`, found integer
| |
| arguments to this method are incorrect
|
= note: expected mutable reference `&mut Vec<{integer}>`
found type `{integer}`
note: method defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: you might have meant to use `push`
|
LL | x.push(42);
| ~~~~
```
Help with common API confusion, like asking for `push` when the data structure really has `append`.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `size` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:17:7
|
LL | x.size();
| ^^^^
|
help: you might have meant to use `len`
|
LL | x.len();
| ~~~
help: there is a method with a similar name
|
LL | x.resize();
| ~~~~~~
```
#59450
Attribute values must be literals. The error you get when that doesn't
hold is pretty bad, e.g.:
```
unexpected expression: 1 + 1
```
You also get the same error if the attribute value is a literal, but an
invalid literal, e.g.:
```
unexpected expression: "foo"suffix
```
This commit does two things.
- Changes the error message to "attribute value must be a literal",
which gives a better idea of what the problem is and how to fix it. It
also no longer prints the invalid expression, because the carets below
highlight it anyway.
- Separates the "not a literal" case from the "invalid literal" case.
Which means invalid literals now get the specific error at the literal
level, rather than at the attribute level.
