4448: Generate configuration for launch.json r=vsrs a=vsrs
This PR adds two new commands: `"rust-analyzer.debug"` and `"rust-analyzer.newDebugConfig"`. The former is a supplement to the existing `"rust-analyzer.run"` command and works the same way: asks for a runnable and starts new debug session. The latter allows adding a new configuration to **launch.json** (or to update an existing one).
If the new option `"rust-analyzer.debug.useLaunchJson"` is set to true then `"rust-analyzer.debug"` and Debug Lens will first look for existing debug configuration in **launch.json**. That is, it has become possible to specify startup arguments, env variables, etc.
`"rust-analyzer.debug.useLaunchJson"` is false by default, but it might be worth making true the default value. Personally I prefer true, but I'm not sure if it is good for all value.
----
I think that this PR also solves https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3441.
Both methods to update launch.json mentioned in the issue do not work:
1. Menu. It is only possible to add a launch.json configuration template via a debug adapter. And anyway it's only a template and it is impossible to specify arguments from an extension.
2. DebugConfigurationProvider. The exact opposite situation: it is possible to specify all debug session settings, but it is impossible to export these settings to launch.json.
Separate `"rust-analyzer.newDebugConfig"` command looks better for me.
----
Fixes#4450Fixes#3441
Co-authored-by: vsrs <vit@conrlab.com>
Co-authored-by: vsrs <62505555+vsrs@users.noreply.github.com>
4273: Trigger add_vis assist on paths/record fields as well r=flodiebold a=TimoFreiberg
Resolves#4037.
- [x] Function defs
- [x] ADT defs
- [x] Enum variants
- [x] Consts
- [x] Statics
- [x] Traits
- [x] Type aliases
- [x] Modules
- [x] Record fields (using different implementation)
- [x] struct fields
- [x] enum variant fields
- ❌ union fields (`Semantics::resolve_record_field` seems to not work for union fields, so I think this can be handled in a future PR)
- [x] More tests?
- [x] Improve test fixture code and documentation a bit (see [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Fwg-rls-2.2E0/topic/resolve_path.20between.20fixture.20files))
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
4445: Correctly fill default type parameters r=flodiebold a=montekki
Fixes#3877
So, basically even if the parameters are omitted from the `impl` block, check the parameters in `trait` if they have a default type, and if they do go from `hir` to `ast::TypeArg`. I've added a helper for that but I am not sure that it's a proper way to go from `hir` to `ast` here.
Co-authored-by: Fedor Sakharov <fedor.sakharov@gmail.com>
4405: Make some stuff public so that they can be reused by other tools r=pksunkara a=pksunkara
So, my little experiment of building a code analysis tool using rust-analyzer is successful. I am going to proceed to build the tool now. This PR makes the needed things public.
I know there were some things about trying to change stuff regarding loading workspaces, which would make it more easier for other tools to reuse. But, until then, it should be okay using this `load_cargo` fn.
Btw, if I were publish my tool, I would need the `ra` crates to be released. Since @matklad told me that he doesn't want to care about breaking stuff, I would propose the following.
Every monday, during the weekly release, we release a new pre v1 minor version of all the crates. That way, we don't need to care about breaking stuff but still have rust-analyzer on crates.io.
I made https://github.com/pksunkara/cargo-workspaces to help release workspace crates easily.
So, coming week, we start with `0.1.0`, then week after that, we release `0.2.0` and then `0.3.0` etc.. until we decide on `1.0.0` which is probably when the compiler team also starts using the crates. There is no limit to the minor versions (we can even have `0.150.0` or `0.1500.0`), so I don't see anything wrong with this strategy.
Co-authored-by: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
4452: Use back ticks instead of single quotes around code r=matklad a=tspiteri
Also, use back ticks instead of single quotes in `rustc_unescape_error_to_string` for `EE:UnclosedUnicodeEscape`.
Co-authored-by: Trevor Spiteri <tspiteri@ieee.org>
4434: add more specific match postfix for Result and Option r=matklad a=bnjjj
In order to have the same behavior than `if let` and `while let`
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
4083: Smol documentation for ast nodes r=matklad a=Veetaha
There is a tremendous amount of TODOs to clarify the topics I am not certain about.
Please @matklad, @edwin0cheng review carefully, I even left some mentions of your names in todos to put your attention where you most probably can give comments.
In order to simplify the review, I separated the codegen (i.e. changes in `ast/generated/nodes.rs`) from `ast_src` changes (they in fact just duplicate one another) into two commits.
Also, I had to hack a little bit to let the docs be generated as doc comments and not as doc attributes because it's easier to read them this way and IIRC we don't support hints for `#[doc = ""]` attributes for now...
Closes#3682
Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
4441: fix typo unimplementated -> unimplemented r=edwin0cheng a=tspiteri
Pretty harmless typo, but it does get exposed in lsp-rust-analyzer-expand-macro.
Co-authored-by: Trevor Spiteri <tspiteri@ieee.org>
