Previously, submatches were handled simply by searching in placeholders
for more matches. That only works if we search all nodes in the tree
recursively. In a subsequent commit, I intend to make search not always
be recursive recursive. This commit prepares for that by finding all
matches, even if they overlap, then nesting them and removing
overlapping matches.
In a later commit, paths in templates will be resolved. This allows us
to render the path with appropriate qualifiers for its context. Here we
prepare for that change by updating existing tests where I'd previously
not bothered to define the items that the template referred to.
The methods `edits_for_file` and `find_matches_in_file` are replaced with just `edits` and `matches`. This simplifies the API a bit, but more importantly it makes it possible in a subsequent commit for SSR to decide to not search all files.
Also renamed find_matches to slow_scan_node to reflect that it's a slow
way to do things. Actually the name came from a later commit and
probably makes more sense once there's an alternative.
This is in preparation for a subsequent commit where we add special
handling for paths in the template, allowing them to be qualified
differently in different contexts.
Previously we had:
- Multiple rules
- Each rule had its pattern parsed as an expression, path etc
This meant that there were two levels at which there could be multiple
rules.
Now we just have multiple rules. If a pattern can parse as more than one
kind of thing, then they get stored as multiple separate rules.
We also now don't have separate fields for the different kinds of things
that a pattern can parse as. This makes adding new kinds of things
simpler.
Previously, add_search_pattern would construct a rule with a dummy
replacement. Now the replacement is an Option. This is slightly cleaner
and also opens the way for parsing the replacement template as the same
kind of thing as the search pattern.
5507: Require quotes around key-value cfg flags in rust-project.json r=matklad a=matklad
This matches rustc command-line flags, as well as the build.rs format.
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
5498: assists: change_return_type_to_result: clarify assist description r=matklad a=matthiaskrgr
I had a -> Option<PathBuf> fn, which I wanted to change to Result<PathBuf, _>, but despite advertising to do so, the assist did not change the result type to Result<PathBuf, _> but instead just wrapped it in a Result: <Result<Option<PathBuf>, _>.
I changed the assist description to "Wrap return type in Result" to clarify that the assist only wraps the preexisting type and does not do any actual Option-to-Result refactoring.
Co-authored-by: Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de>
5480: Fix snippetTextEdits applying to other files r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg
Fixes#4551
`vscode.window.visibleTextEditors` only contains editors whose contents are being displayed at the moment, so the previous logic only worked if the other file for which a snippetTextEdit is being received was visible in a separate split.
I feel that this is a hacky approach, so feel free to reject it for something nicer :)
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
5497: Store macro invocation parameters as text instead of tt r=jonas-schievink a=lnicola
We don't want to expand macros on every source change because it can be arbitrarily slow, but the token trees can be rather large. So instead we can cache the invocation parameters (as text).
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
I had a -> Option<PathBuf> fn, which I wanted to change to Result<PathBuf, _>, but despite advertising to do so, the assist did not
change the result type to Result<PathBuf, _> but instead just wrapped it in a Result: <Result<Option<PathBuf>, _>.
I changed the assist description to "Wrap return type in Result" to clarify that the assist only wraps the preexisting type and does
not do any deep Option-to-Result refactoring.
vscode.window.visibleTextEditors only contains editors whose contents
are being displayed at the moment, so the previous logic only worked if
the other file for which a snippetTextEdit is being received was visible
in a separate split.
